Jump to content

Fin Fang Foom Is Appalled At Alexis Arquette


FinFangFoom
This topic is 7050 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted

I caught about three minutes of The Surreal Life the other night (more than three minutes and my head would have exploded like someone in "Scanners") and was appalled to learn that Alexis Arquette (brother to Patricia and David) is going to have a sex change and become a butt ugly woman.

 

In the process, he's going to cut off his youknowhat.

 

And there's alot to cut off. (see below)

 

Obviously, he's insane.

 

http://blackdogue.porkyhost.com/AsISeeItFamecaps/AsISeeIt_A/AlexisArquette001.jpg

 

Appallingly yours,

 

FFF

Posted

I couldn't imagine spending one-minute watching such gutter trash just as I couldn't imagine spending $1 on Tom Isern. But who can resist the temptation to see Arquette naked, pre-cut?

 

Thanks for the link to the pic, Fin. What is it about short, skinny queens with flopping cock that make you want to fuck 'em with wild abondon? Aren't they just girls with meat?

 

I've known several hot boys with kielbasa between their legs who opted for vaginas to complete the unfulfilled aspect in their lives. For those of us who think a man's cock doesn't reign as the most important organ a man can offer, I guess Alexis' loss is no big deal after all. But for size queens, make sure you reserve your seat to this memorial. :-)

Posted

There is a joke which is told by a very close friend of Alexis's and a more than nodding aquaintence of mine tells

"Whats the difference between a Rolls Royce and a Lexus?-while not everyone has driven a Rolls,most have ridden Alexis!"

Tis a shame to chop of such a pretty wiener though!

What would good ol'Charlie Weaver think of this?!?(am I dating myself here?)

Posted

The image didn't work when I first looked at this thread. Then, immediately after I posted, the image appeared. Now it's gone.

 

What is up with this picture stuff? Isn't M4M playing this bullshit conservatism too safe? Could we please see a membership fee soon, make this site private, and let its members truly enjoy the potential benefits a site like this can offer? I can't be the only one here who would gladly pay to see pics of naked, erect men. I find the members here to be an amazing resource for images. Bring on the eroticism, please!

 

Fin posted an image by Greg Gorman, with Alexis flacid, and no one can convince me it wasn't an art image.

 

Of course, I could understand any copyright issues. Mr. Gorman considers himself a fine artist and he can get pretty nasty if you try to take advantage of him.

 

ps My sincere apologies to Tom Isern for the above cheap-shot. Sometimes I just can't resist. As kind and fun-loving as I can be, I can't deny there's a devil in Miss Jones. }(

Posted

>The image didn't work when I first looked at this thread.

>Then, immediately after I posted, the image appeared. Now it's

>gone.

>

>What is up with this picture stuff? Isn't M4M playing

>this bullshit conservatism too safe?

 

Well no one here has edited the original post. I have no problem seeing the pic.

 

Barry

Posted

I suspect the original site F3 linked to has a bandwidth throttle. When Steven Draker put the image on his own geocities site it showed up just fine. Of course if it's one of those free geocities sites it has a bandwidth throttle too. We just haven't hit it yet.

Posted

Thank you...

 

Thank you, but I've already seen it. I'm sure others who visit this thread will appreciate not only the image but deej's tech reply. Nice work. :-)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...