DallasFootFtshAthlete

Man, if I were in NYC I'd take you up on that right now.

This ad is new on RM, but this guy seems to be pretty experienced reading his profile info. Just wondering if anyone has met him before and/or if he might have been around before under a different name. Thanks! https://rentmen.eu/Trent_Daniels

I've thought about booking him but it's hard to tell what he really looks like. His pics mostly look good but don't show his face, and there is one pic of him with a ski hat on that shows a little bit of his face that looks like a completely different person. Makes me a little hesitant.

Was his name actually Travis in his ads? I'm trying to figure out if I know who this guy is.

JackBeamXXX is greatness in my recent experience, several times If anyone has questions shoot me a PM and I'll answer what I can. Sexy as hell but a very nice guy who remembers requests and does all he can to make them come true. Highly recommended.

I read that review and based on the 100s of others I've seen that were positive I'd bet that one wasn't entirely accurate.

Anyone familiar with this guy? https://rentmen.eu/Royal_Touch

He had a guy up there. Later when I got home after he had sent me a note full of bullshit I chatted him up under my other email address just to see what he'd say. When I asked him if he was free he said yes but he needed to take a shower because he was "rank". I played dumb and asked him if he had been running and he said no he had "animalistic" sex. Not something I would normally do but I was pissed off about driving that far and wanted to know if he was actually sincere or if he was a schmuck. As I suspected he was a schmuck. I texted him right before I drove out and he told me to come on out, but I imagine he just got a better offer. I don't do the escort thing often, but when I do it's not for animalistic sex and I'm sure it's boring to some guys. He apparently found a less boring opportunity come up, or maybe a better paying one. For the record, I have no problem if someone thinks my 'likes' are borning; I'm sure they are to the majority of gay guys. I just have a problem when someone doesn't have the balls to tell me that and has me waste my time and gasoline driving 25 miles for no reason.

He made an appointment with me, had me drive out to his hotel, and after I arrived I got a text saying he "had a call he had to take and it would be 20 minutes." I drove 20 miles to get there so I just turned around and went home. He texted me after I got home to tell me he was sorry but he'd have to cancel. Waste of time. The problem with that is the next time he comes to town I have no problem making sure he gets a night in the downtown free hotel aka the city jail. I'm the most understanding guy in the world but screw me around and I can be pretty damn vindictive.

This is what I'd think/hope would be the reaction. As I said I haven't reached out to many but among the responses I've gotten was a guy who said "It sounds like a kink, and I don't do peoples' kinks". I never thought of it that way, but I guess anything involving dominate/submissive roleplay could be considered a kink.

Completely agree. Mine is probably very unusual -- I'm straight for the most part, was married to a woman most of my adult life (we divorced because we argued, not because of anything wrong in the romance department) but have had a fantasy with guys since I was a kid. I suppressed it as a I grew up and for most of adulthood, but it's a pretty intense fantasy and it's stayed with me all this time. I finally decided to explore it several years ago and it's been among the most intense and satisfying things I've done. But it's not meat and potatoes for sure as I don't have any interest in having sex with a guy, but I guess it's more of a submissive kink kind of thing. With that said, I think the majority of escorts I've seen want meat and potatoes and are not interested in any sort of role play either because it's not gratifying to them or because they think it sounds like a lot of work. I can totally understand either of those things. And I've met a couple that would do it but weren't really into it so it wasn't real satisfying. But when someone is into it, it's freaking mindblowing for me. The funniest thing I've run into is a guy who assumed since I enjoyed women and men that I'd enjoy a threesome with both at the same time. But to me having them both at the same time is like mixing chocolate ice cream and bleu cheese -- it's just oil and water, apples and elephants. Just doesn't work.

So I'm probably different than a lot of clients in that I've got some roleplay fantasies that get me supercharged turned on and am not looking for meat and potatoes if I reach out to an escort (not roleplay that requires a lot of work or effort for the record). Is that something most providers are cool with? I'm more of a novice because I don't reach out frequently, but just from the profiles I've read it seems most are looking for meat and potatoes. Every once in awhile there is a profile that talks about fantasy and roleplay, but they are few and far between.

Just wondering if anyone out there is familiar with this fetish. Anyone who as a kid saw old reruns of an Irwin Allen show called "Land of the Giants" might understand it. The fetish is basically being shrunk down to six inches tall and being kept by a man or a woman, usually in a cage, where you are in their total control. There is a site dedicated to it called "coiledfist.org". A lot of people with foot fetishes have some degree of this fetish and get completely turned on by being in the total control of someone else who is stronger than them in every way. It's definitely a submissive type of fetish obviously. I have a bit of that fetish and it definitely came from watching that show when I was a kid in the 80s (it's a show from the 60s, but still lives on in reruns on the Sci-Fi channel). I know there are a number of people out there, but it still seems like one of the least known about fetishes -- probably because of the fear that people would think you're nuts being turned on by it.

It's based on communicating with him. He was quick to tell me his demands, what he does and doesn't do, etc. When I told him I just wanted a massage he just started ignoring me. The image it portrayed to me is that he thinks he's so hot that anyone contacting him should want to have mad passionate sex, which he starts out telling you (scolding you) on what he won't do, and and as you don't seem interested in doing those things to his incredibly hot body he's not interested in booking. It was bizarre.

I was just wondering if there is a defined difference between these two types of sessions or if it's something where your mileage may vary. Both sound tantalizing and like you would leave with your stress released.

Seems very narcissistic. He is non-responsive until he needs to make some cash then he won't leave you alone. I'd steer clear. I've found the best experiences are the ones with guys who are interested in their clients' satisfaction. And the worst experiences are with the narcissists.

Wasn't real responsive.

Could be, haha. Some of these guys hear "mostly straight" and make a lot of assumptions. But I was very clear what I wanted, and I don't think I could have been any clearer about wanting him to be in control. It seemed like he had the exact same likes as I do which could be great except in a situation where we both like the other guy to take control.

Killian Knox is a really good looking man. My only coaching for anyone hiring him is to know this: In my experience he was much more interested in what he wanted to do to me than he was in what I wanted to do. That was a turn off to me. It's disappointing because he would make the perfect Daddy type of companion, but it seems like he wanted to make me the Daddy which isn't at all what I was looking for. When you tell him what you want it automatically turns into what he wants. I'm guessing he's a great hire if what you want and what he wants are the same thing. If not it might feel like he should be paying you instead of the other way around. I don't hire many guys, and when I have a couple of times it's seemed like when they've heard me say "mostly straight guy wanting to explore" they get an idea that I'm there for their benefit instead of mine, and when you meet them they go apeshit wanting to do things that I don't want them to do. Maybe I should leave the 'mostly straight' part out, but it's my way of telling them I'm not a top or bottom and I have something specific I'm looking for.

Well, I'm guessing he has no reviews because he's a jerk. Not very friendly at all, seems to be pretty impressed with himself.

He's back up again. For someone that good looking it's odd he has no reviews.

So is the GT in your name for Mustang GT, or Giant?

This is a really old post but I know you're still active. I'm one of those foot guys so if you have any remaining questions all these years later please let me know. And no, I'd say skip the pedicure, that would be my preference.

Exactly. If people don't want to see him that's their decision -- it doesn't affect me one way or the other. A couple of folks seem irritated at me for saying the pics are accurate as though I have some sort of an agenda when I don't give a crap whether people see him or not.

They are accurate as of about two months ago -- he looks just like them. I have no idea how old the pics on his profile are, all I know is they are very accurate of what he looks like now.