GTMike

Based on comments it seems that you are in Canada and I therefore assume Canadian (Smiley face), but please know most American's aren't aware of how things work here. Just FYI the "FDIC" which does stand for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation actually is an independent agency of the US Federal Government. It was created in the early 1930's when thousands of banks failed after our stock market crash and US Depression. In the ordinary course the Company doesn't receive money from the US Congress budget appropriations and is not money from taxpayers. It generates income from premiums and fees that banks and savings associations pay into the system for deposit insurance converage for the banking system. So outside commentary now saying that fees, premiums etc. are going to be levied is sorta trying to create a false impression that it's out of the ordinary in order to satsify depositor liabilities. Now the US Treasury Department and The Federal Reserve can step in but i believe what they announced yesterday was that the Treasury department would backstop/guarantee the Depositors account values at these banks and the Federal Reserve would relax some lending requirements and provide favorable loans to banks to ensure liquidity throughout the system. This is all intended to help restore/maintain calm to the overal banking system. And these are backstops to allow time for the FDIC insurance corporation to do it's thing but not a full step of actually using taxpayer dollars to fund the banks liabilities and be a "bail-out". (Some will argue that even by the government using it's power to back-stop or guarantee risk that it still creates a moral hazard for banks to be less risk adverse. Reasonable people can disagree when something does or doesn't cross a line.) So you might ask why is it set up this way? The FDIC is one example whereby "the free market" versus centralized goverment does a regulation dance and ebbs and flows over the years between more or less government regulation and intervention. Our system is set up as the free market banking industry trades off government regulation with a negotiated self-regulation. So as a compromise it's a quasi-free market concept and the banks collectively pay fees and premiums to provide insurance to depositors as a trade off for other regulations and controls etc.. they'd prefer not to abide by. The Banking system wants to generate profits by making investments and increase it's shareholder value while the government has a responsibility to help protect consumers in a fundamental way by insuring theres a safe reliable place to store cash for the overall benefit of a healthy functioning capital market system.

If Biden's most recent comments today were that all the uninsured depsitors would be able to get their funds back in full that's because once the regulators took over and was able to assess the situation there were/would be enough assets in a disposition in order to satisfy the full amounts of Deposits. If there wasn't then the uninsured may not have been able to recover the full amounts. My point was that after a seizure there is a process and in this case that is a different process from the comment I was responding to which stated he did not like "bail-outs". (The inference being that the Company was being rescued at taxpayer expense and would continue operating further with additional goverment supplied taxpayer funds). Which in this case is a different process.

I don't think that SVB and Signature Bank are getting bailouts as you may be thinking. Depositors are getting their Federally Insured amounts up to the max of $250k. These banks are being seized and then having their assets and accounts frozen and evaluated. If they can't be sold during an organized regulated process then remaining assets eventually are distributed to uninsured account holders at a pro-rata discounted amount. Executives at these banks typically get fired and recent large compensation to employees can in some cases be recovered. Signature apparently was heavily into Crypto based depositor exposure among other risky and real estate related type businesses. Regarding your comment about highly educated and compensated people not being aware of insurance limits you are correct. Moderator's note: politics redacted.

Does anyone know if he has a R_Masseur profile?

Welcome to the zaniness of this profile hahaha!

I do use it quite a bit and would agree with that and is consistent with the directions and recommended usage.

I have personal experience with that product and if you'd like lemme know and I can PM you.

And different number.

After being booted from the Royal Family gotta get creative supplementing income!! Hahaha

He could be your neighbor if you lived in Santa Barbara. That's Prince Harry (well no longer officially "Prince") and he's married with 2 kids. Hahaha

Bumping this https://rentmasseur.com/Scottchas/

Doesn't list travel schedule on profile but no longer in LA from yesterday and lists as being in San Diego now. Only takes same day appointments.

I should have been clearer. Taken as a whole with a profile that seems "TGTBT" like that and based on looking at those profiles plus getting an auto-generated reply to go to text immediately and stating only taking same day appointments that is why I made the comment. Also should be clearer about the aspect of what the TGTBT comment meant. I get being concerned about having discussions over RM vis a vis problems potentially with LE, but same could be true in order to have no record of conversation over site when making arrangements to meet. Then later if reports are made that the Pic's aren't of the person there's nothing to substantiate and the Pic's can be used longer and more effectively.

I suspect if you reach out to message either of them over RM you'll get an auto-generated to text them for same day appointment's only. I haven't yet but just my 2 cents of spidey-senses.

Also interested to learn more.

Quibble away!! No problem with me being corrected with facts! All good. And my bad as I must have conflated being intro'd to Facebook Messenger communication and then also Facetiming video around the same time and blended them!

FaceTiming is really nothing more than just a video call that's apart of Facebook's tech platform. So if both parties are fine giving respective Facebook profiles than it's just making a phone call through Facebook's environment that's a live video.

Yes the rent masseur profile doesn't exist under that name but a few months ago when the rent men profile was mentioned I'm pretty sure it was same but interest is in current profile https://rent.men/TurkishHairyDude. Perhaps I should start new thread or potentially change title if I can?

I live in LA (Hollywood area) and saw this view yesterday! Especially after heavy rains (even hail over past week) and snow in elevated mountains the views are spectacular!

Yes probably should as he could speak with this gentlemen who also seems to be oddly as young and hot and tri-lingual in an odd way - https://rent.men/pierresosas

Bumping myself and also noting tweak on Profile name - https://rent.men/TurkishHairyDude I guess decided "Hairy" might work better than "Dude", maybe? Haha Oooops!! Moderators this entry should be moved from Spa to Deli! (Apologies, my bad!)

I had almost similar experience with a potential 1st time meet. Text’d/Messages on RM site a couple times before and arranged meeting. We mutually confirmed early afternoon and early evening for the time later in night (at my place). Then about 30 - 45 minutes before scheduled time asked for deposit. I politely declined and he got fairly upset saying he couldn’t understand why i’d have a problem when so many other businesses/and other professions require similar procedures and proceeded to give me examples. Had to tell him that may/may not be analogous but my issue mostly had to do with that a deposit wasn’t ever mentioned on his long-standing profile. We had communicated many times prior over past weeks/months trying to match schedules and we had comprehensively discussed likes, boundaries etc..that could happen during our time together with no objections. And as mentioned confirmed twice earlier that day. A deposit was never discussed or hinted at prior to right before the session. To this day i’m conflicted whether it was always an intentional scam, or was a sincere deposit request prior to having to travel and hedging risk and session would be fine, or the person could just had been drinking/high and whether originally intended or not it’d be easier for excuses changing the time/details etc.. to start flowing. once that deposit was made 🥴

Curious if anyone may have insights? - https://rent.men/DomLawXL Pic's associated with different profile potentially? Thx in advance.

Wow congrats! There's no way I personally could've believed the guy was real the entire time until a day after it happened and I woke up and was clear it wasn't a dream. Hahaha

I don't know if it's clear in your gents conversation but just in case and FYI that particular gent has had an SA profile for a good while and then more recently I noticed that he added an RM profile. Let me be clearer. I don't know if it's the same person behind the profiles. But the pictures are the same.