TruthBTold

Oh yeah. And versatile if his profile is accurate.

Oh yeah. I would have pushed him out of bed and had him sleep on the couch if he was going to treat me that way. How about waking me and suggesting that he sleep on the couch. Being the gentleman I would have suggested I be the one. I'm sorry the way he handled it (if I got the gist right) was hardly gentlemanly.

This one looks like TJ Cummings. Just ready to eat.

Plus he looks fairly thick so that helps. I personally have not bottomed that often so am not looking for huge. A 6 inch guy can do what I want done, particularly if he is thick.

I think that the when stealthing is involved you are getting closer to rape because the consent itself was conditioned on wearing a condom. If you take off the condom without notifying the partner prior to doing so you have removed the consent. The person that removes the condom commits a voluntary act (I presume that accidental removal is not stealthing). Promising not to ejaculate on the other hand would be infinitely harder to classify because ejaculation is often involuntary and uncontrollable. The bottom has allowed penetration (I am assuming without the top using a condom) and therefore I can't imagine that both parties do not assume the risks of ejaculation. However, if the top agrees to wear a condom then it definitely wanders into the stealthing category. This was on Wikipedia: In UK law, consent to a specific sex act, but not to any sex act without exceptions, is known as conditional consent. In 2017, a Swiss court convicted a French man for rape for removing a condom during sex against the expectations of the woman he was having sex with. A 2014 a Supreme Court of Canada ruling upheld a sexual assault conviction of a man who poked holes in his condom. It also noted that in 2017 an Australian court is now underway considering stealthing.

Jean-Paul Miro

Does he think you would have to be told?

I would like to say mine. However, Francois, Francois, Francois.

Is that a badge the clothed guy is wearing? Nothing like a man doing his job. Or at least the first part of his job.

Now that you have said it so well, when I think that these things were happening to so many other people certainly makes me feel less special.

I agree with you that the rape would come once consent to penetration is withdrawn. From then on you are raping the person. However it is not the ejaculation that makes it the rape but rather that you are penetrating without consent. If you say you allow me to penetrate you but do not want me to ejaculate in you and I penetrate but ejaculate I have not raped you. Unless you insist I end penetration and I do not. Then it is rape. I suppose it might be like if you tell me that I can penetrate you but only if I kiss you while I am fucking you. Then I penetrate you but just don't kiss you I am not raping you unless you specifically state something akin to "Stop, get off me" or such. The fact that I failed to kiss you after I had penetrated you does not make it rape.

I do not believe this would be rape. The actual sexual assault is the forced act of penetration. If someone does not object to the penetration but only whether you ejaculate or not I do not believe it would be rape.

It could be if the fact finder finds that you were too drunk to actually consent to anything.

There is a recent Closet Works commercial which consists of a little girl complaining about how her life is so disorganized (particularly her shoe collection) that she is going crazy and that her parents need to buy her a closet system. Her voice pushes me to the brink. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_6bSVr8bP0

For some reason, I just get uncomfortable watching lesbian love scenes, even in mainstream movies, e.g., Bound. I have also wondered why straight men are turned on by watching two women having sex while they cannot feel the same way about seeing two men do the same thing. I think that in the case of the women they always think that the women aren't really lesbian or that even if they are the men are such studs that they would be able to turn the women straight.

Two things I had to break out loud and laugh about in the clip. First, where she describes being stuck in a trailer in the snow waiting to be called with Miriam Margolyes. I would have paid anything to be there. Second, where she is talking about the fact that there are so few good parts written for older actresses and when there are Judi [Dench] has always got there first . . . Jude always has her "paws" on them first.

I absolutely agree with you that broaching the BB topic has to be done early because if it is a "must have" element on the client's part then why go further. However, what do you find to be a way to finesse the topic into the conversation? Do you just say that you noticed the the escort had put down "Ask Me" when discussing "Safe/BB" however you were not sure what that meant as far as their profile went. I am not sure if that means only with a guy who is neg and on PrEP.

I snore loudly (or so I am told) so I do not hire for overnights. It's a bummer but I want to avoid the embarrassment.

Just imagine ripping it off and you'll be fine.

All I can think of is the two of us in the gay remake of From Here To Eternity.

No, it is not rape. Of course, you would have to check the definition of sexual assault (or rape) under the state but consenting to the penetration with or without ejaculation is not sexual assault. For instance, in Illinois "A person commits criminal sexual assault if that person commits an act of sexual penetration and: uses force or threat of force; knows the victim lacks capacity to give consent; is a family member of the victim and the victim is under 18 years old; is at least 17 years old, holds a position of authority or trust over the victim, and the victim is between 13 and 18 years old. It does not matter if the violator ejaculates or not. There is no defense to the rape statute that the person did not ejaculate. I think that because sexual penetration is an element of the statute only a man can be charged with sexual assault. It seems that a woman would be charged with sexual abuse.

That's why you should keep up those ballet lessons.

Yup, he is not going to know what hit him. I would rip those jeans off.

Is the first (purplekow being innocent) almost as impossible to comprehend or exist as the second (Ace not knowing some nasty things to do)?