Scott Virginian

His twitter feed is definitely entertaining. (I don't mean that sarcastically.) His vibe strikes me as the sex you hope you get to regret. LOL https://app.rent.men/DomnTwink

Just wondering if anyone has ever met this fellow. https://app.rent.men/CesarHungXXL

Looks like no one has headed out to Long Island ... or given him an LIRR ticket. lol

If you ask him for a golden shower, does it contain actual gold?

Those eyes... whew.

More sadly, it seems it's gone completely to 404 - File Not Found. I'm bummed. Given the warm compliments here, I was hoping to reach out to him.

Most unfortunate. Apparently she was held on life support to determine whether her organs could be given to others, as she requested. If her death gives new life to others, that's something positive arising from tragedy. Her life was often troubled by mental health problems and leaves two sons, 20 and 13, surely grieving the loss of their mother. I also regret that she harmed others on the way out of this world. I hope her heirs and estate executors will try to set that right.

Definitely hot. Not 9" but certainly enough to work with.

From the website www.responsibility.org: Every state has an implied consent law that stipulates that drivers consent to be tested if they are suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs. Test refusal (breath, blood, urine, etc.) is often the first step a drunk driver takes to avoid prosecution. Test refusals are most common among high-risk/repeat impaired drivers, primarily because these individuals know that their test results are likely to have a high-BAC and they are familiar with the system. In most states, the penalties for refusal involve administrative license suspensions ranging from 90 to 180 days. This is typically less punitive than the criminal sanctions for per se DUI. On 6/23/2016 the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled in Birchfield v. North Dakota that motorists may not be criminally punished for refusing to submit to a blood test based on legally implied consent. Since that time, a number of states that had criminal sanctions outlined in statute have begun the processing of amending legislation and now only permit civil sanctions. For example, both Kansas and Minnesota had criminal penalties for test refusal but the Supreme Court in each state ruled that the existing refusal laws violate the federal constitutional rights of drivers. States that still have criminal provisions in statute include AK, AR, FL, KY, ME, NE, ND, RI, VT, and VA. Also, in these states some caveats apply to when/how the law can be applied: Arkansas – law only applies to drivers under 21 Florida – refusal becomes a misdemeanor if the driver’s license has previously been suspended for refusal Kentucky – refusal only carries criminal penalties if the individual is convicted of the DUI Louisiana – law only applies if the individual has refused to submit to a chemical test on two previous occasions Maine – refusal can be considered an aggravating factor at the time of sentencing Vermont – refusal only carries criminal penalties if the person has previously been convicted of DUI or is involved in a collision causing serious bodily injury/death

I think you’re right.

Seems his RM ads have disappeared (or he's changed name and I can't find his ad).

I also could not find any sort of obvious "request" link. Can't speak to whether providers have some sort of ability to unlock if you message them, but maybe one of the providers also among our membership will see this and let us know. You have to be a premium member to review? Hmm. I wonder if that will change the weak reliability of reviews. My cynical guess is no, but I'm no expert at their business model.

One thing that appears to be disappearing -- or rather getting monetized: previously, you could ask providers to share their private galleries. Unless they adjust the site, private galleries can only be seen by paying premium membership. I noticed that a couple of galleries that I can currently see on v 6.0 are no longer visible on v 7.0, and there's no way to ask a provider to share.

RTLuiss seems to be back... (or maybe he just popped up in my feed). https://rentmen.eu/RTluiss/

Paths aren't crossing anytime soon (not his fault).

If after the first kiss I no longer care, I’m good to go.

Prior thread, different name: https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/125231-411-on-“fun-and-interesting”/#comment-1944343

I believe several people have been with him, but they got hit in the head by his dong and haven’t regained consciousness yet.

Lordy, I hope there’s **something** between his legs….

Markxabier's ad popped up on my screen. I don't know if it's new/renewed or I just haven't seen it before. Very attractive. There are some prior threads (now closed) with generally good reactions and opinions. https://rentmen.eu/Markxabier/ https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/104698-markxabier-in-nyc/#comment-132273 https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/75726-411-on-markxabier-gushung-or-nandos/#comment-786581 https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/79701-markxabier-visiting-hartford/#comment-856483

He responded pleasantly and promptly to an IM. It's not everything, but it's a good start.

Purely a guess: shift his branding away from 'college kid' to something more mature and upscale?

If they got him on soliciting or drugs, those are pretty much lifetime exclusions for a visa.

That is always a severe blow and deeply sad, for both. Miscarriage so early is sometimes a sign that the fetus was not genetically viable and there was something wrong in the DNA that stopped further growth. It doesn't mean it hurts any less. I'm terribly sorry for their loss.

There's a prior thread on Fostr -- I read it as "meh".