snogaholic

It looks like he needs a bedmate! ;-)))

Rupert Penry Jones
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cD-ipjEgJmA/TwTcUS2VVMI/AAAAAAAAZB0/Tt-ii_z7NQ8/s1600/Rupert+Penry-Jones+22.jpg

I love how his ad says "safe only" and his vids are the exact opposite :-)

I love how his ad says "safe only" and his vids are the exact opposite :-)

I love how his ad says "safe only" and his vids are the exact opposite :-)

He was rude and unhelpful on the phone so that was that. Caveat emptor.

Yes saw him twice at Warren Street, he has the most beautiful body and smile.
Smells amazing and will tailor what you want for an agreed meet.

Yes, he is running a business - quite poorly in my opinion. When your business is providing customer service and you're providing none, that's a problem. He lost my business for sure. On to the next...

"Please limit messaging me until you are 100% sure you can meet. Otherwise we'll end up chatting a lot and never meeting. I hope you understand ;-)"
 
The client received the above communication from the escort while attempting to determine if they were compatible to meet.
 
Can you tell me how a client can be "100% sure" (as requested by the escort) that he will meet while an escort sends a message (as above) and limits communication?
 
It isn't a case of not liking how an escort replied to the client. It is what the escort said that shut down rapport.

Anyone know anything about this fella?
 
https://rentmen.eu/BigBritishLad

How can a person mention that they are passionate and offer BF experience and not kiss. I find that odd and miss leading. I am taking him off my to do list.

My viewpoint is that it's less intrusive and less offensive to the escort to establish compatibility before making an appointment that I'm then 100% certain to keep rather than commit to someone I know nothing about, then engage in a back and forth, and then cancel an already established appointment. How does that approach make any more sense than just figuring out if a meeting should happen before you commit? I still say my way is better. Plus, the whole notion of hiring someone makes me anxious from the get go. I'm not someone who lets his guard down easily when it comes to sex anyway, let alone having sex with someone who is, for all intents and purposes, a stranger. So, the initial back and forth, question and answer, getting to know you phase is very important for me. If someone isn't willing to even invest a few minutes in you upfront, how generous a lover are they going to be when you finally meet? The session will be all about them. They've already demonstrated that they aren't client focused.

"I really don't see how this message is offending a lot of you guys." I would not say offending. I'd just say that to expect me to be "100% sure" that I want to meet and fork over several hundred dollars after 4 texts that may have taken a total of 60-120 seconds to write is a bit much.

He sounds like a nightmare, based on the collective evidence above.

He sounds like a nightmare, based on the collective evidence above.

he's very handsome ---- and piggy but in a nice way ..... and kind and friendly as well

RM phone is a landline in the Bronx

bump

Adam's great, has an interesting job and life, and is worth every penny x

Manmed, how did the meeting with James turn out? I wager he looked like his hot pix, but I wonder whether he was as interactive and sensual as advertised?
 
Your experience on a scale of 1-10? Thanks in advance.