RussJohnson

It wasn't meant to be rude or mean spirited.

 

PJ=Prince John

 

Don't know how to edit the video to just to the part I wanted to show. Guess it probably lost some of the humor.

 

But you should still put RJ on all your luggage.

I got it:) my response was supposed to be humorous...I guess I'll stick to my day job.

Now everyone thinks I am offended by everything!!!!

 

The quote is at 27 seconds

 

RJ..... put that on your luggage;)

Could be rudely mistaken for BJ (the accuracy of which will neither be confirmed nor denied (offers wont be denied either)

RJ. That's what Natalie Wood called her husband Robert Wagner.

 

~ Boomer ~

Is that the one she married twice?

I meant that I liked what I saw on your ad. If I lived closer to Hartford...

I figured... or anyway I preferred that over "You're cheap for good reason!" haha. Don't worry I'm not here much, I get aro...I travel a lot

RJ,Despardo is a gentleman, so I bet you he meant it as a compliment! I know I would.

No one has ever called me RJ before...I kind of like it.

Any you look worth every penny.

Can't tell if compliment...or insult . I tend to look on the bright side!

I think that is a "big" market rate, I don't really know, I'm under $200

Whispering "You can cum in my ass" during the session is not clear enough. It sounds a little like hot talk to me. It sounds like an endearment you say while making love.

 

Saying "If you are going to cum during the session and if you can cum while fucking me with a condom, that would be my absolute preference. That turns me on immensely." before the session is a much more efficient way of making it more likely.

 

In the end, of course, escorts are people. Sometimes they might be able to cum like this, sometimes they won't. It has absolutely nothing to do with your worth as a bottom.

 

Also, if it is not talked beforehand, the escort might just be protecting you, thinking about your safety or thinking you might thoroughly enjoy seeing him cum the way people cum in porn, you pull out and shoot where it can be seen. However, wondering why past escorts haven't done it is not useful. The only useful thing would be starting to communicate clearly and effectively before the session.

 

 

It may be a little unrelated, but it cracks me up sometimes how some clients are a little distanced from the physical reality of sex. Maybe out of a lack of experience, they regard the escort's body as a machine that can perform things on demand. This is always very evident when it comes to the escort orgasming. To give a few examples:

 

Client receives a massage for an hour, then turns over, touches the escort's leg and then says: "Cum on my chest now".

 

Client takes 25 minutes to open up, and when finally the cock goes in, after two really slow pumps says: "Cum now, I won't be able to take it longer".

 

Client tries to suck cock but deems it too big to go into his mouth, instead says: "Cum now, but come inside my throat".

 

In my case in order for me to cum while fucking someone it only happens after a LOOOONG time fucking in a very barbaric way. Very, very few bottoms can take it and if a bottom is not relaxed and experienced trying to cum inside him would only be incredibly hurtful.

 

It's not for everyone.

 

However if someone tells me during the hiring process that I must cum in his ass or else, I am very likely to pass on the session. I don't negotiate or promise sex acts or fluids. Not only that is illegal in my country, it is also de-humanizing and I find that it destroys the natural flow of intimacy and fun.

 

As with every other lover with whom I might have sex, I will pay great attention to your limits, suggestions and fantasies but will abandon myself to the natural flow of the passion. So far I have found it works really well for me and people that are compatible with me.

"some clients are a little distanced from the physical reality of sex"...if I had a dollar,oh wait! (I'm still new to the forum forgive me for recycling this joke)

I don't fit comfortably in the front or back seats of the Honda Civic (the first driver) and whatever little Lexus the second driver was driving.

I'm 6'4", I own a VW Beetle and a Honda CR-Z, maybe Uber is just not your thing...

I wanted to make sure about this (tipping). I used Uber for the first time last weekend and it was great. I was under the assumption that the tip was automatically added in at 20% as I had directed when I signed up. I read back over everything today it says something like that only applies to "taxis" not UberX, or Black, or whatever their third option is. Can any of you who have used Uber a lot confirm that the tip is added in? Thanks.

You don't have to tip, whether it is "added in" or just part of what is given to the driver is sort of irrelevant from your perspective.

He was traveling with HungRob, so that could be a hot combination! I'd do it!

I agree with you. Until they start doing that, we can't blame the driver for thinking he would make $50K per year as did a previous poster.

 

A side note: I noticed Lyft is no longer running ads with the smiling software engineer from San Francisco standing next to his Prius. Software engineers in Silicon Valley are NOT driving for Lyft and Uber.

 

 

 

That is not true. In 2013 Uber lost about as much as it generated in revenue. Its revenue is the cut they take from each fare. Here's an article about their financials:

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/ubers-revenue-profit-and-loss-2015-8

 

In fairness, most start-ups lose money in their first few years of operation. The article mentions that Uber might be profitable in some cities, such as Chicago, LA, or NYC. However, their losses are increasing and are unsustainable.

 

 

 

Their major problem is they do not know how to run a business. They did not think through the potential liability in case of an accident or driver bad behavior (the stories about their dodgy liability insurance practices are well-documented), nor did they contemplate that their drivers would rely on their income claims to make a living. The Uber app is great. It is the transportation execution side that has issues.

 

Regarding the cramped, out-dated vehicles in use by taxi companies, I, too, am 6'4" tall. Only one of the four Uber cars I have used was big enough to comfortably accommodate me. It was an old, not-well-maintained Dodge Journey (I happen to drive a Journey, albeit a newer and well-maintained model). It was a hot August day in Chicago and the driver was not running the AC. My previous Uber vehicles were a Honda Civic, a small Lexus, and a Jeep that was big on the outside and not big on the inside.

You can sit in the front you know...

Clearly I need to meet some more forum guys.

No one has anything to share?...shame.

Some men who are older may agree to this song by Divine relating to younger men......LOL......

 

Some may agree with Divine's theory - some may not. .

 

At least the dancers in this video clip are younger and hot. Quite appetizing don't you think? .

 

Enjoy!!!

 

There's an older gentleman I know and love who is frequently singing this song around me, I hope it's not targeted and just an earworm.

Uber is about to start operating in Canberra at the end of October, and unlike NSW where Uber drivers are having their vehicle registrations cancelled, the Australian Capital Territory government has announced regulations under which Uber will be allowed to operate. Uber drivers will have to undertake police and health checks and vehicles will have to be inspected. At the same time the ACT Government has announced reductions in the annual fees for taxi plates (from $20k to $5k over the next two years).

 

One critical restriction will be that Uber is banned from using surge pricing during emergencies. During the terrorist siege in Sydney in December last year Uber's automatic surge pricing kicked in when, in fear that there were bombs elsewhere in the CBD, people were trying to get the hell out of there. Uber had significant damage control to do that day, and as I recall they made the rides free.

 

Uber trips will have to be booked via the app (taxis can park in taxi ranks and can be hailed on the street) and cannot be paid in cash. Regular taxis will also be allowed to use the Uber app to book rides. Suddenly, now that Uber will be legal in the ACT, the insurance industry has come out and said they will launch insurance products for Uber drivers!

Sounds like they are figuring out ways to make it work and as people realize how important it is they will come around to it, like most things in life.

Got into Fort Lauderdale yesterday, would normally take the bus but it was too late and after the last bus. Had to get a cab, shoved into an old crown vic which for such a big car has no passenger room in the back for a 6'4" guy. He never said a word, I wasn't even sure if the trunk was going to stay closed. Got to my destination, sat in the car waiting for him to run it on the machine, he didn't, had to get out

Me: "Can I use my card?"

Him: "You don't have cash?"

Me:"No"

What Me wanted to say: "That's not what I asked you?, and don't try to that 'it does't work BS'!"

Him: HUGE SIGH

And of course you still have to give them a tip.

BRING BACK UBER!

Sync, that doesn't mean it can't be an enjoyable movie if you suspend belief and just watch it for what it is. I really didn't read the reviews with that in mind, everyone seems to have focussed on historical accuracy rather than whether it was a good story.

I read a review (and I will try to find it) that said it was also just a bad movie...

From some of the recent comments it appears to me that one of the factors in whether Uber will succeed is the state of the existing taxi industry. If there is an undersupply or if the industry is dysfunctional, Uber will do well. If the existing industry is efficient, Uber's success will not be assured.

 

Cafés in Australia offer a parallel. Starbucks swept the world opening coffee shops everywhere, and in most places they succeeded. In Australia we had cafés everywhere—I heard it said that every corner shop had an espresso machine and knew how to use it—and we still have them. Starbucks came in and tried to take up its market niche but failed dismally, we liked our cafés and continued to use them, and Starbucks' hundred some stores became fewer than 10. Incidentally, McDoanlds managed to build on our café culture and developed their McCafé concept here. The lesson for Uber is clear: unless they meet a demand that isn't already being met they will not do well.

I don't think there is a country, city, place in the world where I have been impressed by the cab company(s). The problem is monopoly. They have had no reason to be better or change. Uber is doing well financially there is no question about that. Their major problems are regulations and "employee" relationships. I think first the cab companies are just going to try to make them go away using those all important political connections if that fails they will try to copy, but for the most part that never works cause you are always one step behind.

Agreed...in FTL the prices are far less than half of what a cab would cost. Once banned in Broward, it looks like the county, under threat of lawsuits from the cities, are allowing Uber back in again.

If any place in the world needs Uber to get the cab companies in shape. It is Broward!