Jump to content

oscarkin

Members
  • Posts

    63
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by oscarkin

  1. Hired him in Minneapolis a couple months ago. Not in great shape, heavier in real life than his pics. Kind of giggly. Boring massage. Sorry I contacted him.

    Very similar experience in another city. He was also fairly disengaged and seemed eager to get things overwith.

  2. Nice find but Teddy Bear? I would call him Teddy otter.

     

    Yes -- even his own description of "boy (man) next door" suggests some uncertainty about which is more appropriate. Whichever it is, he's cute. I think I would go with "cuddly like a teddy bear" over "wild like a bear."

  3. https://www.massagem4m.com/masseur/14838/

    It's a bit of a dance. .especially at legit places.. he's kinda cautious about crossing a line, and I'm making sure I'm not being a hands perv of a client. But it's a dance I love and I admit, even someitmes contacting a guy on massagem4m or masseurfinder, I WONT have an explicit converstaion because I want to enjoy the testing of boundaries.

     

    It IS a dance, and the possibilities change from moment to moment. That's part of the fun. Youngboldone, get right on I-71 North and head up to see Brian Kevin.

  4. I've interacted with him via text several times, but I did not dig the vibe. He seemed like that type that would reply in the affirmative to any question you asked him, just to secure your business, even if for one session. He has good reviews on Rentmen but I don't trust Rentmen reviews.

    Thanks

  5. Thanks, Mike. That's a really interesting perspective. I think that much of what I'm reacting to is fifty different versions of "come hither, fetch me," with only the scenery and the lighting and the costumes changing. In those cases, the excess photos feel more like overplaying the fantasy than trying to illustrate different aspects of a real person.

  6. I've been noticing lately that some escort ads (I'm thinking of Rentmen in particular but I don't think it's limited to that) contain an extraordinarily large number of photos of the escort in question. I'm not talking about ten or fifteen photos. I'm talking about forty or fifty. I'm not exactly sure what I'm reacting to here but I find this plenitude vaguely disquieting. For one thing, it seems that too many photos actually make the escort seem less attractive. If so, this is literally a case of overexposure. Why so many photos? Whatever happened to the idea -- common in the history of art -- that less is more? That concept has always been true of erotic art. But apparently not of escort ads.

×
×
  • Create New...