He really is some talent, for sure. I, personally, am not at all attracted to countertenor voices, they have that same strained quality to my ear that I hear in children's voices. On another "note," he has one fine set of calves.
I think you're right. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiIlNqgyL7jAhWomOAKHSQCDaUQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pornotycoon.com%2F2017%2F02%2F23%2Ftex-davidson-rawfucks-champ-robinson%2F&psig=AOvVaw1M8Yp5IeHnzZe9QRjVB84T&ust=1563542453643550
I think you're right. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiIlNqgyL7jAhWomOAKHSQCDaUQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pornotycoon.com%2F2017%2F02%2F23%2Ftex-davidson-rawfucks-champ-robinson%2F&psig=AOvVaw1M8Yp5IeHnzZe9QRjVB84T&ust=1563542453643550
I was able to find a few references. His name is spelled Aiden rather than "an" (Aiden Gleeson). I didn't find any movie leads, but the following offer some insights for video clips:
http://www.smutjunkies.com/updates/aiden-gleeson-handsome-hung-czech-belami-gay-porn-guy/ ("www.smutjunkies," how undignified)
http://male-erotika.com/main/aiden-gleeson-in-the-flesh/
Perhaps some of the more talented internet data miners can pick up from here.
What works for me is to right click on the image I want, then select "copy image location" from the dropdown menu. Then I go to the post a pic icon and paste the copied image location and left click "insert."
I recall reading about 2 or 3 years ago of a straight male escort who boasted an endowment of 13" long by 8" in girth who charged women $1,000/hr. There were numerous reviews by women who gushed their pleasure with his services, and some engagements were for weekends and longer. I didn't know where to place my envy.
Your above comments are inclusively broad and negative generalizations of providers and clients. To me they suggest that you may have experienced some hurt as both a provider and a client. Be it naiveté or just optimism, I believe the majority of providers to be truthful in their advertising. I would just like them to extend their truthfulness to designating their sexual orientation. With that, I respectfully depart with my conclusions, and leave you with yours.
Yes, I hear you and share your conclusion that we shall not agree. Despite that, I do not partake of the "mute feature" because I am interested in varying opinions. I reject your judgement that expecting providers to be truthful in their advertising is to be aloof or naive about the realities that steer the client/provider dynamic. If the product advertised is not the product delivered, client dissatisfaction is justified. I'm curious how you arrived at the judgement of me being "likely an advocate for 'the client is always right' mentality" from my expecting providers to be clear about their sexual orientations in their advertising.