RadioRob

Published by BANG Showbiz English Katy Perry is to launch a podcast based on the life of Elizabeth Taylor. The 37-year-old pop star has “always felt a kinship” towards the iconic actress – who died in 2011 at the age of 79 – and will narrate the ten-part audio series ‘Elizabeth the First’. In a statement, Katy said: “Like most people, I was attracted to her glamour, and in my own life, I continue to find myself referencing her through some of my visuals. I’ve always felt a kinship towards her — I’ve even literally bathed in the same bathtub where she made that bar-setting ‘Cleopatra’ deal!” Elizabeth is remembered for starring as the title role in 1963 epic ‘Cleopatra’ – based on the life of the Ancient Egyptian Queen – but was also amongst the first celebrities to participate in HIV/AIDS activism, a move which the ‘I Kissed a Girl’ hitmaker finds “inspiring.” She added: “I’’m inspired by her bold activism, her constant boss moves in business, and through it all, an unapologetic way of loving — all things I try to live in my own life. It’s an honor to be able to share her story in this way.” The series will feature stories from people closest to Elizabeth and premiere exclusive audio interviews from her estate at the House of Taylor and will touch on her then- groundbreaking public announcement that she was seeking help for her alcoholism and drug addiction. House of Taylor said in a statement: “We are proud to announce this truly innovative and unique podcast about Elizabeth. During her lifetime, Elizabeth Taylor was arguably the most famous woman in the world. As such, she was talked about, written about, photographed, referenced and celebrated ad infinitum. She was also judged, analyzed and lived her life under the constant scrutiny of the press and public. What makes ‘Elizabeth the First’ extraordinarily special is that this will be the first narrative that explores Elizabeth as the original multihyphenate.” ‘Elizabeth the First’ will debut later this spring on all major podcast platforms including Apple and Spotify. View the full article

Published by BANG Showbiz English JoJo Siwa is “not single”. The former ‘Dance Moms’ star – who split from Kylie Prew last November – teased she is “a loyal lady” and in in a new relationship, though she didn’t say who she is romancing now. While appearing on the ‘Rachel Uncensored’ podcast on Wednesday (30.03.22), the 18-year-old dancer told host Rachel Ballinger: “We’re not single. I say ‘we’re’ because it’s me and my multiple personalities within myself… I am not single and I don’t want to mingle. No, I’m a loyal lady.” She also said: “I was gonna erase my whole bio but just put the lock [emoji],” to which Rachel replied: “She’s exclusive, ladies and gentleman.” The former ‘Dancing With the Stars’ contestant joked about going “around the block” while dating. JoJo didn’t give any details about the identity of her new paramour but did confess that she was “happy”. In November 2021, the YouTube star shared how she “needed sympathy” when her relationship ended. JoJo said: “I don’t know why I needed this, but I needed sympathy when I was going through my breakup and through heartbreak. I just needed validation that what I was feeling was real and validation that missing was real and validation that feeling empty inside and feeling like I lost something was real.” In the same interview, she revealed how she broke down in tears when Jenna Johnson, her professional dance partner on the ABC latin and ballroom competition played an Adele song that described how her “relationship ended”. JoJo said: “One day, Jenna played ‘All I Ask’ on the car ride home from getting a spray tan, and I was sobbing because it was practically how my relationship ended.” View the full article

Published by BANG Showbiz English Ariana DeBose almost didn’t audition for ‘West Side Story’. The 31-year-old actress – who picked up the Best Supporting Actress gong for playing Anita in the Steven Spielberg remake of the 1961 movie musical – felt she wasn’t “going to be a candidate” for the role because she wasn’t famous enough and didn’t look like Rita Moreno, who played the role in the original movie. Ariana – while in conversation with Nicola Coughlan for Interview magazine – was asked by the ‘Bridgerton star said: “I read that you didn’t want to audition for West Side Story?” In response, Ariana told her: “Well, yes and no. I didn’t feel like I was going to be a candidate, because I didn’t have 500,000 followers. I wasn’t ‘a name.’ I was from Broadway, and typically when they make movie musicals in the States, they aren’t using theater talent, they’re using pop stars. The other thing was that the character, Anita, didn’t look like me—she’s not a Black woman.” Ariana – who was involved with the debut of ‘Hamilton’ on Broadway- shared that she was in New York experiencing “chaotic peace” when she found out she was nominated for the Oscar. She said: “I was walking by the East River in New York City. You’re on this walkway with the highway on one side and the tranquil water on the other. It was absolute chaotic peace, which is exactly how I felt about the news.” After the ‘Derry Girls’ star asked her: “Who was the first person that you told?,” after hearing the great news, Ariana revealed that it was her high school pal Jonathan. She said: “My best friend Jonathan was with me, so I guess him. He was my prom date in school, and he will actually be at the Oscars with me! I got him a ticket.” View the full article

Published by Reuters LONDON (Reuters) – On the day Russian troops poured into Ukraine, Russia’s state communications regulator Roskomnadzor put out a statement, demanding that media outlets only use official Russian sources to cover the “special operation” in Ukraine. Otherwise they could be blocked and face a fine of up to 5 million roubles. Russian authorities, which did not comment for this article, have since doubled down on censorship in Russia. On March 4, lawmakers passed amendments that criminalised “discrediting” Russian armed forces or calling for sanctions against Russia. Lawmakers made the spread of “fake” information an offence punishable with fines or a jail term of up to 15 years, a move that led some international news outlets to halt reporting in Russia. Authorities also restricted access to Facebook and Twitter and blocked several independent media and Ukrainian websites. In response, Twitter said people should have free and open access to the internet, particularly during times of crisis. Nick Clegg, president of global affairs for Facebook’s parent company Meta, said millions of ordinary Russians would be cut off from reliable information. Several Russian media outlets suspended their work. Ekho Moskvy, a liberal radio station, was dissolved by its board after the prosecutor general’s office blocked its website over its coverage of the war. Television channel Rain suspended its work after its website was blocked. The Novaya Gazeta newspaper, whose editor Dmitry Muratov was a co-winner of last year’s Nobel Peace Prize, said it would pause its work until the end of Russia’s “special operation” in Ukraine. Online censorship was already rising before the invasion. Ahead of the September elections last year, major internet outages were caused by a crackdown on websites linked to jailed opposition leader Alexei Navalny and on technology used to circumvent online bans. Around 200,000 websites were blocked in 2021, according to data from Roskomsvoboda, a group that monitors internet freedom in Russia. They included the website of OVD-Info, which has documented anti-Kremlin protests for years. This year, as of March 10, more than 46,000 sites have been blocked, according to Roskomsvoboda. (reporting by Lena Masri; editing by Janet McBride) View the full article

Published by AFP Former White House advisor Jared Kushner was not in the country during the insurrection Washington (AFP) – Former US president Donald Trump’s son-in-law and top White House aide Jared Kushner is due to answer questions Thursday from the House panel investigating last year’s assault on the Capitol. Kushner, the highest-ranking Trump advisor and the first family member to testify so far, is appearing by video link voluntarily and has not been subpoenaed. He was returning from Saudi Arabia on the day of the January 6 insurrection, and did not spend the night at the White House upon his return to the United States. Kushner’s appearance caps an intense period of almost daily revelations from the investigation. It was revealed last week that Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, sent more than two dozen texts pushing wild conspiracy theories and urging then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to help overturn the 2020 election. Kushner’s name appeared in a message from Thomas dated November 13, 2020, when she told Meadows: “Just forwarded to yr gmail an email I sent Jared this am… improved coordination now will help the cavalry come and Fraud exposed and America saved.” It also emerged that White House logs given to investigators for the day of the insurrection show a gap of nearly eight hours in Trump’s calls, including the period covering the violence. The committee is investigating whether it has the full record and if Trump communicated that day through phones of aides or personal disposable “burner” phones. The select committee has also asked for testimony from Kushner’s wife, former first daughter Ivanka Trump, who was in the White House on January 6 and pleaded with her father to speak out against the violence, according to reports. The White House said on Tuesday it would reject any assertion of “executive privilege” — which allows presidents to keep certain work-related conversations with aides private — from Kushner or Ivanka Trump. The committee is approaching the end of its investigative phase and is planning public hearings this spring. The Department of Justice’s investigation of the attack, which left at least five people dead, “has expanded to examine the preparations for the rally that preceded the riot,” including those who “assisted in planning, funding and executing” the event, The Washington Post reported. View the full article

Published by AFP Campaigners say half of US diabetics have been rationing their insulin during the pandemic Washington (AFP) – US lawmakers were set to vote Thursday on a bill that would limit the cost of insulin to $35 a month, a transformative curb for millions of diabetics who pay hundreds of dollars for the life-sustaining hormone. Drug pricing has vexed politicians for years in the United States, which has the highest annual health expenditure of any industrialized country, at around $11,000 per capita. Insulin costs the 7.4 million American adults who use it to manage their diabetes eight times as much as in other wealthy nations, according to a 2020 study commissioned by the Health and Human Services Department. “A drug that has been off protections by copyright for a long period of time, it still sees prices four, five, six, seven, 10 times the price of production. So we need to deal with that,” House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer told reporters on Wednesday. The bill would require private health insurance companies to set prices for a month’s supply of insulin at no more than $35, or 25 percent of a plan’s negotiated price, whichever is lower, starting in 2023 for some patients and 2024 for all. The cap was a provision in President Joe Biden’s “Build Back Better” social welfare bill that was torpedoed by Democratic infighting in Congress late last year. Biden brought the issue back into the spotlight during his State of the Union address on March 1, reinvigorating calls for action on pricing from diabetes advocates. The effort is being seen as the only way for Democrats to show they’re capable of acting on sky-high prescription drug prices before November’s midterm elections. ‘Costing a lot’ The upper chamber of Congress, the US Senate, is holding its own cross-party negotiations on driving down insulin costs by targeting the middlemen between health insurance companies and pharmacies. And a separate Democrat-only bill from Georgia’s Senator Raphael Warnock that would also cap the price at $35 is likely to be combined with the effort. “I’m a pastor — I’m on the ground — and so I know that everybody knows somebody with diabetes,” Warnock said in a video promoting his initiative. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters last week he believed a bipartisan bill had a good chance of passing when lawmakers return from a break at the end of April. Research suggests that more than a quarter of Americans with type 1 diabetes have had to ration insulin they could not afford. Campaigners say the proportion went up to 50 percent during the pandemic. It remains unclear if any legislation can gain the 10 Republican votes needed to advance in the Senate, but some opposition lawmakers have shown interest in an issue that affects voters across the board. “I’d be for some kind of regulation where we can help. Too many people (are) paying thousands of dollars a month. I’m not big on regulating process, but that one’s costing a lot of people a lot of money,” Alabama Senator Tommy Tuberville told Axios. A three-year congressional probe released in December by the House Oversight Committee’s majority Democrats offered an insight into the tactics of the world’s most profitable drugmakers. For 12 medications the committee examined, the manufacturers raised prices more than 250 times in the five years from 2016, it said — as their chief executives pocketed paychecks totaling almost $800 million. View the full article

Published by Radar Online Mega Will Smith never “refused” to leave the Oscars because he wasn’t asked to go. According to a new report, producers told the King Richard actor he could stay after he slapped Chris Rock on the live broadcast in front of millions. The details conflict with what the Academy of Motion Pictures said in their letter in which it claimed Will “refused” to leave the Dolby Theater when officials attempted to remove him. However, this report backs up what LAPD sources claim. According to insiders, the police officers at the event on standby were never informed anyone wanted Will removed from the building, something they most certainly would have been told. Mega Well-placed sources allege that forcefully removing Will was never an option since the officers on duty were not told any of the Academy Award bosses wanted him to go. The latest report insists that Will never knew there was a conversation about making him leave the event; however, here’s where it gets messy. There are usually two sides to every story, and, in this case, there are three. While sources claim Will was unaware, other insiders insist there was chatter backstage about asking the actor to leave, but the people who make the big bucks couldn’t decide on what to do. Some allegedly wanted him booted, while others wanted him to stay. ABC The third side is this — according to the report, Oscars producer Will Packer and an Academy official approached Will and said, “We do not want you to leave.” Packer allegedly changed his tune, walking up to Will around 8 PM, which was 35 minutes after he assaulted Chris, to tell him he could stay. Five minutes later, Will collected his first Best Actor win. This could get messy for the Academy as all eyes are on the organization that is meeting to decide Will’s punishment for putting his hands on Chris during Sunday’s broadcast. “Things unfolded in a way we could not have anticipated,” the Academy claimed in their letter, released on Wednesday. “While we would like to clarify that Mr. Smith was asked to leave the ceremony and refused, we also recognize we could have handled the situation differently.” Mega As for Chris, he opted not to file a police report against Will. He also is not planning to take legal action against the star. While Will offered the comedian an apology, Chris has yet to speak about the matter. During his first stand-up show on Wednesday evening, he refused to crack jokes about the slap. View the full article

Published by Reuters By Christopher Bing (Reuters) – The U.S. government began privately warning some American companies the day after Russia invaded Ukraine that Moscow could manipulate software designed by Russian cybersecurity company Kaspersky to cause harm, according to a senior U.S. official and two people familiar with the matter. The classified briefings are part of Washington’s broader strategy to prepare providers of critical infrastructure such as water, telecoms and energy for potential Russian intrusions. President Joe Biden said last week that sanctions imposed on Russia for its Feb. 24 attack on Ukraine could result in a backlash, including cyber disruptions, but the White House did not offer specifics. “The risk calculation has changed with the Ukraine conflict,” said the senior U.S. official about Kaspersky’s software. “It has increased.” Kaspersky, one of the cybersecurity industry’s most popular anti-virus software makers, is headquartered in Moscow and was founded by a former Russian intelligence officer, Eugene Kaspersky. A Kaspersky spokeswoman said in a statement that the briefings about purported risks of Kaspersky software would be “further damaging” to Kaspersky’s reputation “without giving the company the opportunity to respond directly to such concerns” and that it “is not appropriate or just.” The senior U.S. official said Kaspersky’s Russia-based staff could be coerced into providing or helping establish remote access into their customers’ computers by Russian law enforcement or intelligence agencies. Kaspersky, which has an office in the United States, lists partnerships with Microsoft, Intel and IBM on its website. Microsoft declined to comment. Intel and IBM did not respond to requests for comment. On March 25, the Federal Communications Commission added Kaspersky to its list of communications equipment and service providers deemed threats to U.S. national security. It is not the first time Washington has said Kaspersky could be influenced by the Kremlin. The Trump administration spent months banning Kaspersky from government systems and warning numerous companies to not use the software in 2017 and 2018. U.S. security agencies conducted a series of similar cybersecurity briefings surrounding the Trump ban. The content of those meetings four years ago was comparable to the new briefings, said one of the people familiar with the matter. Over the years, Kaspersky has consistently denied wrongdoing or any secret partnership with Russian intelligence. It is unclear whether a specific incident or piece of new intelligence led to the security briefings. The senior official declined to comment on classified information. Until now no U.S. or allied intelligence agency has ever offered direct, public proof of a backdoor in Kaspersky software. Following the Trump decision, Kaspersky opened a series of transparency centers, where it says partners can review its code to check for malicious activity. A company blog post at the time explained the goal was to build trust with customers after the U.S. accusations. But the U.S. official said the transparency centers are not “even a fig leaf” because they do not address the U.S. government’s concern. “Moscow software engineers handle the [software] updates, that’s where the risk comes,” they said. “They can send malicious commands through the updaters and that comes from Russia.” Cybersecurity experts say that because of how anti-virus software normally functions on computers where it is installed, it requires a deep level of control to discovery malware. This makes anti-virus software an inherently advantageous channel to conduct espionage. In addition, Kaspersky’s products are also sometimes sold under white label sales agreements. This means the software can be packaged and renamed in commercial deals by information technology contractors, making their origin difficult to immediately determine. While not referring to Kaspersky by name, Britain’s cybersecurity centre on Tuesday said organizations providing services related to Ukraine or critical infrastructure should reconsider the risk associated with using Russian computer technology in their supply chains. “We have no evidence that the Russian state intends to suborn Russian commercial products and services to cause damage to UK interests, but the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence,” the National Cyber Security Centre said in a blog post. (Reporting by Christopher Bing; editing by Chris Sanders and Grant McCool) View the full article

Published by New York Daily News American citizens who do not fit into traditional male or female gender roles will be permitted to choose a third option on their U.S. passports. Starting April 11, applicants who consider themselves transgender, non-binary or others who do not conform to traditional gender definitions can select “X” as an option on their passports. “The Department of State has reached another milestone in our work to better serve all U.S. citizens, regardless of their gender identity,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said. The official designation on passport forms will read: “Unspecified or another gender … Read More View the full article

Published by DPA Makita Samba (r) as Camille and Noemie Merlant as Nora in “Paris, 13th District,” a black-and-white film that puts the focus on sexuality and female desire with a humorous and light-hearted touch. Neue Visionen Filmverleih/dpa Camille has a lot of intense sex to make up for his frustration with his job as a high school teacher. Emilie, who dropped out from studying political science, works at a call centre and tends to have brief one-night stands. Nora ditched her job as a real estate agent in the countryside and wants to study law in Paris. And Amber Sweet offers erotic services online. Jacques Audiard tells the story of the thirty-somethings whose paths cross in Paris’ 13th arrondissement. In “Paris, 13th District,” (“Les Olympiades, Paris 13e”) they become friends or lovers and sometimes both. Audiard is known for embracing daring new things. After his western “The Sisters Brothers” and the refugee drama “Demons and Miracles,” this film tells the story of young adults who are seeking, grappling with their sexual orientation in the age of dating apps, searching for love – and above all for identity. Emilie is Chinese and has limited contact with her family. After she loses her job at the call centre, she needs to find someone to share her apartment. Camille answers her ad. He’s a frustrated high school teacher who wants uncomplicated sex and is not interested in a committed relationship. Barely has he introduced himself, he becomes her lover and moves in. He moves out again just as fast as Emilie becomes jealous of his new partners, including Nora. In her early 30s, Nora has come to Paris from the provinces to resume her law studies after years of working as a real estate agent for her uncle. She soon abandons her dreams of law. She goes to a party in a blonde wig and is mistaken for camgirl Amber Sweet. She agrees to a selfie that is then widely shared online. At the university, people bully her, calling her a whore. Nora contacts Amber and they start a dialogue online – and a lesbian love affair. Job changes, bullying and loneliness: Audiard portrays a generation that has discarded traditional codes in the age of Tinder and is looking for love and relationships. His film is based on three comics by the well-known New York author Adrian Tomines. Audiard has tended to give us male film heroes in the past but this time he co-wrote the script with Léa Mysius (“Ava”) and Céline Sciamma, who won several awards with “Portrait of a Lady on Fire,” about an affair between two women in the 18th century. Their influence is clear to see. The film is a far cry from Audiard’s past works which were usually packed with violence. “Paris, 13th District” is startling for its humour and the lightness with which the film shows sexuality and female desire. Lucie Zhang (l) as Emilie, Noemie Merlant as Nora and Makita Samba as Camille in “Paris, 13th District,” a black-and-white film that puts the focus on sexuality and female desire with a humorous and light-hearted touch. Neue Visionen Filmverleih/dpa Noemie Merlant as Nora in “Paris, 13th District,” a black-and-white film that puts the focus on sexuality and female desire with a humorous and light-hearted touch. Neue Visionen Filmverleih/dpa View the full article

Published by Reuters UK By Ossian Shine and Simon Evans DOHA (Reuters) – Simmering tensions boiled to the surface at the FIFA congress on Thursday when Norway’s soccer chief Lise Klaveness hit out at the 2022 World Cup’s Qatari hosts over the country’s human rights record. The Norwegian Football Federation president, who became the body’s first female leader in its 120-year history when elected this month, said the World Cup had been awarded by FIFA “in unacceptable ways with unacceptable consequences”. “Human rights, equality, democracy, the core interests of football, were not in the starting 11 until many years la… Read More View the full article

Published by The Seattle Times SEATTLE — Brandi Carlile and the Grammys have a good thing going. The Maple Valley roots rocker has established herself as a perennial contender, earning nominations in at least one of the marquee categories three of the last four years, and perhaps more importantly, getting a coveted performance slot on the star-studded telecast that comes with it. In Carlile, the Recording Academy has a partner in a generation-bridging songwriter and performer who embodies the institution’s musical values, and is helping lead its MusiCares tribute to Joni Mitchell days before Sunday’s 64th Grammy Awards show… Read More View the full article

Published by Reuters UK (Reuters) – Qatar World Cup chief executive Nasser Al-Khater has called for a meeting with Gareth Southgate after the England manager said he is unhappy some fans will not feel safe travelling to the event due to concerns over human rights issues in the country. Homosexuality is illegal in the Gulf state and there is also unease over women’s rights, while a report by Amnesty International found that thousands of migrant workers in the country were being exploited, which Qatar has denied. Southgate said this month it was a “great shame” there were issues stopping fans going to the World Cup, hi… Read More View the full article

Published by Reuters WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Senator Susan Collins on Wednesday became the first Republican to declare support for President Joe Biden’s Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson, further boosting her prospects of becoming the first Black woman to serve on the top U.S. judicial body. Collins, considered a moderate Republican, disclosed her intention to vote in the Senate to confirm the federal appellate judge in a statement released by her office. The senator said she reviewed Jackson’s record, watched her testify during her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing last week and met her twice in person, and concluded the judge possesses the “experience, qualifications and integrity” to serve in the lifetime post. Collins lamented what she called a disturbing trend of politicizing the judicial nomination process. “No matter where you fall on the ideological spectrum, anyone who has watched several of the last Supreme Court confirmation hearings would reach the conclusion that the process is broken,” she said. “In my view, the role the Constitution clearly assigns to the Senate is to examine the experience, qualifications, and integrity of the nominee. It is not to assess whether a nominee reflects the ideology of an individual Senator or would rule exactly as an individual Senator would want,” Collins added. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a Democrat, said last week the chamber was “on track” to confirm Jackson to the lifetime job before its expected break for Easter on April 8. Senator Joe Manchin, the most conservative Democrat in the Senate, announced last Friday that he would vote to confirm her, signaling that she will have the votes to overcome widespread Republican opposition. With a simple majority needed for confirmation and the Senate divided 50-50 between the parties, Jackson will get the job if Democrats remain united regardless of how the Republicans vote. Her confirmation would not alter the court’s ideological balance – it has a 6-3 conservative majority – but would let Biden freshen its liberal bloc with a 51-year-old jurist young enough to serve for decades. The Democratic president nominated Jackson last month to the lifetime post to succeed retiring liberal Justice Stephen Breyer. During her confirmation hearing, several Republican senators accused Jackson of being lenient when she served as a trial court judge on sentencing child pornography offenders. Jackson defended her sentencing record, and American Bar Association witnesses rejected the allegations that she was “soft on crime.” (Reporting by Will Dunham; editing by Jonathan Oatis) View the full article

Published by Reuters By Barbara Goldberg (Reuters) -A Connecticut judge on Wednesday held conspiracy theorist Alex Jones in contempt and fined him $25,000 a day until he sits for a deposition in a defamation lawsuit filed by relatives of the victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting. Jones, founder of the right-wing Infowars website who claimed the shooting was a hoax, failed to comply with court orders to appear at a deposition on March 23 and 24, Connecticut Superior Court Judge Barbara Bellis said during an online hearing. His lawyers had sought to explain his absence by claiming that “Jones was remaining at home under his doctor’s supervision when, in fact, he was working at his studios and broadcasting his show,” Bellis said, referring to a podcast produced by Jones. She set an April 15 deadline for Jones to complete a two-day deposition, a goal that would “purge” the contempt ruling. Starting April 1, the court would assess a fine of $25,000 each weekday until he sits for the deposition, the judge ruled. “Alex Jones willfully and in bad faith violated without justification several clear court orders requiring his attendance at his depositions,” the judge said. The defamation suit has already been decided in favor of the families of the shooting victims, with the judge saying in November that Jones defaulted by failing to provide documents and is responsible for damages to the plaintiffs. The online hearing on Wednesday took place a day after Sandy Hook families rejected an offer by Jones to pay $120,000 to each of the 13 plaintiffs to settle the lawsuit. The plaintiffs are suing Jones in response to his claims that the shooting, which left 20 children and six school employees dead, never happened. He had claimed the incident at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, was fabricated by gun-control advocates and mainstream media. In response, several parents sued Jones and Infowars, as well as its parent company, for defamation in both Austin, Texas and in Waterbury, Connecticut. Infowars is based in Texas. According to court records, his rejected offer to the plaintiffs included a statement that read in part: “Mr. Jones extends his heartfelt apology for any distress his remarks caused.” Each of the plaintiffs immediately turned down the offer, saying it was “a transparent and desperate attempt by Alex Jones to escape a public reckoning under oath with his deceitful, profit-driven campaign against the plaintiffs and the memory of their loved ones lost at Sandy Hook.” (Reporting by Barbara Goldberg in New YorkEditing by Marguerita Choy) View the full article

Published by Reuters By Maria Caspani (Reuters) – Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt on Wednesday signed a Republican-backed bill banning transgender athletes from girls’ school sports, adding to a list of states that have passed or enacted similar laws. “We are protecting women’s sports, we’re ensuring a level playing field for female athletes,” Stitt, a Republican, said at a signing ceremony, surrounded by young female athletes. The so-called Save Women’s Sports Act applies to public schools in the state through college. Oklahoma joined 12 other states that have enacted legislation prohibiting transgender girls from participating and competing in girls’ sports in school. Similar bills that were passed in Arizona and Kentucky last week are awaiting action from the governors of those states. Opponents of these laws have characterized them as backed by conservative special interests to drum up support ahead of the midterm elections, when Republicans seek to win back a majority in the Senate and the House of Representatives. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated in 2019 that just 1.8% of high school students in the country are transgender, and the advocacy group Human Rights Campaign has said that according to surveys, only about 12% of them play on girls’ sports teams. Transgender rights have been pushed to the forefront of the culture wars playing out across the United States in recent years, together with issues such as reproductive rights. The Human Rights Campaign said it is tracking over 300 bills targeting the LGBTQ+ community that are currently moving across state legislatures, many specifically aimed at transgender youth. (Reporting by Maria Caspani in New York; Editing by Donna Bryson and Matthew Lewis) View the full article

Published by BANG Showbiz English Elliot Page’s character on ‘The Umbrella Academy’ will come out as a transgender. The 35-year-old actor says his character will transition – along with a new name – in the third season of the Netflix show based on the popular comic book series that follows seven siblings with supernatural powers. On Twitter, Elliot posted a still from the new season, writing: “Meet Viktor Hargreeves [umbrella emoji] @UmbrellaAcad”. Netflix added: “Welcome to the family Viktor – we’re so happy you’re here.” The streamer’s LGBTQ+ content page added: “FEELS SO GOOD TO SAY THIS: Elliot Page stars as Viktor Hargreeves in Umbrella Academy S3!!!” This direction for the ‘Juno’ star’’s character in season three – which will drop in the summer – matches his real life trajectory as he publicly came out as transgender back in 2020, admitting that he felt “lucky” to be able to do so. Elliot wrote on Instagram: “I feel lucky to be writing this. To be here. To have arrived at this place in my life.” He also shared how his mind “flourished” as he accepted his true gender identity. Elliot said: “I couldn’t believe the amount of energy I had, ideas, how my imagination flourished, because the constant discomfort and pain around that aspect of my body was gone.” In 2021, Elliot became the first transgender man to appear on the cover of Time magazine, where he shared what he was “anticipating” following his news. He told the magazine: “What I was anticipating was a lot of support and love and a massive amount of hatred and transphobia. That’s essentially what happened.” View the full article

Published by NJ.com Passaic students hit the streets Monday to protest a new Board of Education policy that prohibits them from raising the LGBTQ+ Pride banner like they did last year. About 40 students, some draped in the rainbow flag and others wrapped in blankets, marched in the bitter cold to demand the board rescind its policy that allows only the American flag, the state flag and the school flag to be flown. Students stood in front of the city’s three public high schools urging their classmates to join them on the sidewalk – then continued the protest at the board meeting on Monday night. “It should not hav… Read More View the full article

“Don’t Say Gay” Bill Becomes Law The widely criticized “Don’t Say Gay” bill is now law after Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the bill into law on Monday amongst a gathering of conservative lawmakers, students and parents. The measure will go into effect on July 1. DeSantis’ signature comes after months of national outcry over the chilling effect the bill poses for LGBTQ students in Florida, educators and classroom instruction and discussion of LGBTQ topics. The Parental Rights in Education bill explicitly prohibits the teaching of sexual orientation and gender identity in grades K-3 and bans similar discussions at all grade levels if done “in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.” DeSantis signed the bill during a ceremony held at Classical Preparatory School, a K-12 charter school in Spring Hill, FL that wouldn’t be subject to measure. The bill allows parents to file civil suits against school districts and school employees if they deem a topic of discussion about LGBTQ individuals or topics isn’t appropriate for their child regardless of the student’s age. “This kind of ever-present possibility of having to defend oneself, of a school district having to spend resources, will have its own chilling effects,” Copeland said. “If a student raises a question that is not part of the lesson plan or the instructional plan of a teacher, but that question ties to sexual orientation or gender identity, then what may the teacher say at that point?” added Clay Calvert, University of Florida Levin College of Law professor. Smith, like others, signaled that the fight to repeal the bill will continue. “The battle against #DontSayGay is far from over,” he said in a statement. “To those LGBTQ youth in Florida and around the world struggling to find support, just know that you are loved exactly the way you are and we’ll continue to fight for you every single day because your lives are worth fighting for.” Don’t Say Gay: Previously on Towleroad Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Signs Controversial ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Bill Into Law; LGBTQ Advocates Denounce ‘Cowardly’ Decision, Plan To Continue Fight Brian Bell March 29, 2022 Read More Disney employees stage walkouts to protest company response to Florida bill Towleroad March 23, 2022 Read More Disney Walkout: Employees, Allies Protest CEO’s Response To Florida’s ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Bill; “Had They Said Something It Wouldn’t Have Passed.” Brian Bell March 22, 2022 Read More Sponsor of ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Bill Says Quiet Part Out Loud — Too Many [Damn] Gay Kids Nowadays; Herald Editorial Nails “reminiscing of a Grandpa” Towleroad March 9, 2022 Read More Disney Employees Furious CEO Bob Chapek Touts Disney Pride, Recent Characters of Color, Won’t Condemn ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Bill, And Can’t See That Makes It Worse Towleroad March 7, 2022 Read More ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Passes Florida House, 69-47; Law Would Limit School Discussions; Reps Voting in Favor Told: ‘You Are Voting To Be An Opponent’ Of LGBTQ Community Towleroad February 24, 2022 Read More Screenshot via YouTube View the full article

Published by Radar Online Mega Roman Abramovich, the Russian oligarch who was forced to give up ownership of Chelsea Football Club due to sanctions placed on him in connection to his close ties to Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin, has reportedly suffered symptoms of poisoning after taking part in peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. According to Daily Star, the 55-year-old billionaire and Ukrainian peace negotiators are victims of suspected poisoning shortly after their talks to deescalate the increasingly violent invasion of Ukraine by Russian forces. Mega In early March, Abramovich reportedly traveled between Russia’s capital of Moscow, the Ukraine city of Lviv, and Ukraine’s capital of Kyiv, along with other peace negotiators, in an attempt to end the Russia/Ukraine conflict. Soon after appearing in Moscow, both Abramovich and two senior members of the Ukrainian delegation allegedly began experiencing symptoms that would suggest they were poisoned. Mega While some of the symptoms were minor — such as red eyes and constant tearing — other signs they experienced were much more severe, including painful burning and substantial skin peeling from their faces and hands. Abramovich and the two Ukrainian delegates are reportedly doing better as their symptoms improve every day; however, there are also reports that the suspected poisoning attack was carried out by a radical group of Russians while the peace negotiators were in Moscow. At this time, poison experts are reportedly investigating the potential poisonings to determine if the symptoms were caused by a chemical agent, a biological agent, or even possibly an electromagnetic-radiation attack. As Radar reported, Abramovich was just one of the many Russian oligarchs to be sanctioned by Western nations shortly after Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine on February 24. Mega “These oligarchs, businesses and hired thugs are complicit in the murder of innocent civilians and it is right that they pay the price,” British Secretary of State Liz Truss said at the time while announcing the sanctions being put in place against specific Russian individuals. “Putin should be under no illusions – we are united with our allies and will keep tightening the screw on the Russian economy to help ensure he fails in Ukraine. There will be no let-up.” Following Abramovich’s assets being frozen due to the recently placed sanctions, Chelsea Football Club is technically owned by the British government until the Russian billionaire finds a new buyer for the team. View the full article