carolus

Maybe right-wingers don't understand the meaning of given terms. being anti-bigotry isn't being woke. i guess your conservative media aren't that intelligent or are overly agenda-driven. it further seems that you oppose condemning slurs used in bad ways. OK. I don't. I won't call a Jew the k-word, or a southeast Asian the g-word. I don't need to. i gain nothing from not doing it. I'm not a racist person, so i don't need to. if you do, or it violates your freedom, ok. freedom isn't limitless though. maybe gain the freedom not to conflate terms, or form coherent strands of thought and arguments. You're implicitly stating that you like to, or advocate, using slurs in anger. OK, if Indian Hindu accidently walks on your foot in public, and s/he evens apologises sincerely, then diminish their religion by saying they worship cows or something. i guess it's your right, since you have no self-control and it's all freedom BRUH.

Any crosdresser escorts inthe USA? Not transgender but actual identifying males who dress up?

All people are free. does that bother you? if so, i pity you. And yes, people don't regulate others. is that another things most adide by well enough that offends you or hurts you? if somebody random told me i couldn't wear a red baseball cap, I'll tell them to fuck off right in their face, and unless the state or something said i couldn't via a valid law thee would be NOTHING they could do about it!!

The implication is that there will be a blind eye to it. This is patently false. Yes, in all countries people do things that are illegal out of plain sight. What's new? but to say it doesn't get punished or "everybody does it, it's cool!" is clearly false. I personally wouldn't want to go to a city in a professed Islamic state, which they only allow for global clout, tax monies and soft power, so no. We all have our own tastes. One doesn't have to have visited a place to cite an opinion on it. Don't regulate what people do. Only do so if you have any actual authority to do so.....

National History Museum and British Museum are boring and cringe. V&A is the best, imho.

For escorts who top, how do you handle clients who aren't clean down there? We all know shit happens, both literally and metaphorically, and even when a person usually tries to clean themselves. Isn't off-putting? How can it not kill your boners?

They have open executions for gay people. Do people still do it in private? why shouldn't they? but it doesn't mean they don't actively condemnand punish it. Assuming it's fine to go about there and do it is foolish.

Doesn't matter. For every action, there is a consequence. Yes, misunderstandings happen. but then misunderstandings aren't all of equal severity, cause or nature. I'd suggest he does air it. What then? People will know he likes to hook up? Just like millions around the world, nay billions. Humans are sexual. reality isn't an obstacle. it will fuck up his career? And? How far does this go? If a waiter in a cafe gets his order wrong, and he sees he's wearing a Star of David pendant, does this mean he can call him the k-word in anger? Why not? apparently, using slurs is acceptable when one is angry, and self-responsibility is dead in today's world. Would it be wrong in this case for the waiter to call him out? Moreover, a lot of porn stars often cite they have an official profile, in part to stop cases like this. It's part of due diligence. Even low-grade onlyfans stars who have never done pro porn do this. So I doubt he'd have much defence. Moreover, if we deem bigotry wrong, then it's not a case of being selective of stuff. I don't see it as such. Don't use bigoted language. Simple. I know some will say that's a violation of their freedom. oh fuck loool. stop being little babies. I can't walk around squeezing women's boobs. big deal. in any event, there are some shit one shouldn't do. end of story. So yeah, i think he should do it, and I've advised him to. he doesn't know the person, nor owe him anything. And if he were in that position, he'd not do that. Such is life.

I had a friend who saw a lower-level porn star on a hook-up app "looking for friends". He hit him up, and due to some bs misunderstanding they had a quarrel and he left a final message saying "ps..black c**t" he is thinking about exposing this on X and other social media, and the hit would definitely mess up his business. Should he? The person in question often does interracial shoots, so it's pretty dark overall.

Rourke's Diamonds is a good one - he's a British twink and has lots of vids with fucking, wanking, etc. Stephen Brenland is a rip-off. He's good-looking and has a big dick, possibly 8" at least. But his vids are very short and you hardly see his cock that much even though one can tell he's hung.

In Saudi, they are pretty strict. Even secular Islamic states like Turkey are pretty hardcore on it.

UAE allows a haram city. I guess the tax money is worth it! Not sure what the appeal of Dubai is. Seems superficial and something only online influencers push to look cool or seem they have clout.

is that like saying you want a fuck a black guy on Juneteenth and then proclaiming you're not racist?

Not you can, unfortunately. Not totally at least. Een if a person looks happy, or has no obvious physical signs of abuse, there is no guarantee that one isn't being trafficked. Not all traffickers or pimps necessarily abuse their escorts. Making prostitution legal alleviates this. Even in countries like the UK where it's semi-legal, this provides some legal cover.

Writing reviews: 1 - Most often, yes. To recall a good time, or warn others of a bad time 2 - I hope to gauge whether it's worth seeing an escort. 3 - If I've had a very good or very bad time. If it's "meh" i won't submit one. 4 - Never, I've never had this. 5 - No, it's too forward IMHO. 6 - No, I haven't. 7 - I've had a few been rebutted by an escort, given a point I've raised in good faith. But I've never had one removed. 8 - No, i haven't. I don't usually tell them I've written a review, if I enjoy a given session. 9 - Once, if the review whilst submitted in good faith has damaged them somehow. 10 - Yes. All reviews, whether good or bad, should be permitted on sites. But only those posted in good faith. If an experience is genuinely bad, then it should be allowed. the provider can either aim to provide a better service, or suck up the potential loss of income. if it were done out of spite or for malicious reasons, then the website owner should work with the escort to have it taken down.

About once or twice a month.

there are so many other paces to get escorts from, without risk of banning. what's more people would whine if they got banned, even if it's started clearly in their TOS. Do people whine if they go to McDonald's and they found out their coupon is invalid, since the promotion has ended or that given branch doesn't do it? If so, Lord help them.

So OP is racist, and thinks fucking a black guy on the holiday to celebrate the abolition of slavery is "a good deed".

just an oddly-stated question.

With respect, i don't get the question. Providers offer services like a restaurant or cafe does. It's entirely within the vision and appeal of the owner of said establishments. Escorts typically have. set of acts they are willing to offer, based on what they like, or what is popular in wider society. They might not do "common" stuff if for whatever reason. Maybe they don't like it, or they reserve it for loved ones. It's like some providers do everything with condoms. Others do intercourse with condoms but do OWO. Others yet do everything bareback. The latter might not be advisable but it's their choice and consequence. Maybe said escorts who don't do rimming don't like it. I dont' see the connection between that and being a top. Everybody of all descriptions is different.

i never have. sure, a really good fuck would make one tingle a bit for a few days afterwards, but never love. escorts are in it for money, so they're not for dating.

providers have any combination they wish, based on personal preferences or what have you. not everybody likes eating ass. it is what it is.

You have a flair for making illogical leaps. You do realise that many men who pay for sex are married or otherwise have no issues in getting dates/sex? why then does that lend to "not testing boundaries"? curiosity, desire, and just really being horny in the moment are not limited to one's non-paid for status! look even at Kevin Spacey for a really alleged extreme case of pushing boundaries! if an A-list actor can do it, a random Joe can. Your incessant moral lectures and bad rational associations are not why I come here!

said man isn't straight if he's willing to give anal play to another man.

lol. yes, the moral indignation. go and label any inquiry as "sexual assault" and not even get hiring dynamics which all parties accept. If you have issues in enforcing boundaries, don't project that onto others.