Jump to content

Oakman

Members
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Oakman reacted to builder boy in Mike Masters   
    I think his Body looks amazing for his age or anyones for that matter.   He definitely has stood the rest of time.    We have had some great exchanges……
  2. Like
    Oakman got a reaction from tennisjock in Joe DiCarlo in LA   
    I had a great time with Joe in SF recently. I did some digging on this site and came across some clues to find face pics, and there are plenty if you can find em. Finding those pics is what made me want to book him - he’s a hunk. He was very enthusiastic about meeting and delivered in every way. Great attitude, great energy, great equipment, excellent performance. 
  3. Agree
    Oakman got a reaction from Simon Suraci in What are your red flags?   
    How much initial texting conversation between a client and provider is appropriate to seal the deal? It can be quick and easy to communicate time and rate, but really understanding the service the client desires or the service the provider is interested in providing may involve an actual conversation (so many minutes!).
     
    As a client, I always reach out with a stack of photos, self-description, and the scenario I’m interested in, as well as my preferred time-frame. The provider’s initial response had better be engaging and show an understanding of and genuine interest in the scenario. I’ve had great, brief, sexy conversations with some first rate providers. If the provider can’t show (or won’t fake) a little sexy interest in the meet-up, I know it’s not for me.
    In my line of work, the cost of “business development” is recovered by having a consistent, satisfied, repeated customer base. 
  4. Like
    Oakman reacted to DBWEHO in Joe DiCarlo in LA   
    Fantastic top, great personality, very hansome. "We have a little time left, wanna cuddle?" Whens the last time you heard that? 
  5. Like
    Oakman reacted to Simon Suraci in What are your red flags?   
    I don’t see the point in posting statements like these to ads. The time wasters are going to do what they do regardless. If anything, they are the least likely of anyone to read and understand -much less respect- the statement, or anything else in the ad. If someone can’t afford to hire and they know full well they can’t, they still reach out and waste time asking a bunch of questions.
    Hiring is a fantasy. Engaging a provider makes that fantasy feel more real, even if you don’t meet the guy. I get it, and I can’t stop people from doing this. It’s just part of the business I have to deal with on a daily basis by filtering out the bad apples when they start showing red flags. As soon as they do, I make my best effort to decline them politely end the conversation. When necessary, I go the extra step and block them.
    Meanwhile, by including statements like the above on the ad, you put off some of the would be serious clients by making them feel like they’re bothering you. Not everyone who contacts you is going to book you. That’s normal. No amount of complaining or disclaimers is going to change that behavior. 
  6. Agree
    Oakman reacted to SouthOfTheBorder in What are your red flags?   
    dealbreakers from client perspective,
    any reference to PNP in the ad
    any visual clues re: PNP - there’s a look 
    any visual clues to a disorganized environment 
    any mention of “anything goes” or similar risky behavior
    no reviews or unacceptable ratio of neg reviews (more than 10% NO)
    more than 4-6 hours time to respond to inquiry 
    pressure to book immediately 
    deposits 
    younger than 26
    hubris 
    providers soliciting on hookup apps - not professional 
     
×
×
  • Create New...