rvwnsd

It was very clever and distinctive when Rod Hagen and Alec Andrews referred to themselves as "courtesans." However, now that seemingly everyone refers to themselves as such the term has lost some of its cache. Fortunately, Rod's and Alec's cache (among other things) remain intact.

Last year I cancelled cable and switched entirely to Apple TV. Absolutely love it. You can get Netflix, Hulu, and other streaming services in addition to the shows available for purchase from iTunes. Regarding CNN, MSNBC, et al - you might be able to watch them using their websites. I'm an NPR guy, so the lack of the cable "news" stations doesn't bother me in the least.

Andrew Cunanan certainly possessed a special kind of evil, but his case was a little different than the others mentioned in this thread. Aside from his first victim- a friend in Minneapolis- Cunanan didn't know any of the people he killed.

Oh, facts! Pe-shaw!!

Some folks like breadcrumbs, others like cole slaw.

I don't understand why you would jump to that conclusion. azdr said that he (azdr) is not into kissing and anal. He didn't say that the escort wasn't. In fact, the "stats" section indicates the escort is into kissing. Nowhere in that review does it say TH is not an enthusiastic kisser. It says azdr is not into kissing. Would anyone find it acceptable if azdr wrote that he does not like kissing but despite knowing that the escort enthusiastically kissed him anyway? This is why I ask the escort for his thoughts on what I like to do and why I do not rely heavily on reviews when determining whether an escort is a match. If I love to get off by licking KFC cole slaw out of an escort's buttcrack, he agrees to do it, and I write a review about it does that help anyone who prefers their cole slaw served in a bowl?

Yes, you have. But that is different than a client having a so-so time with an escort because there isn't chemistry or communication going awry because a prospective client's communications are off-putting for some reason. I believe we have read where stellar escorts have discussed client communications they have not been happy with. It happens and there's nothing wrong with it in my opinion.

Thank you. See - it was useful. Helped you avoid a hiring mistake. I don't see why the mention of "chemistry" is troublesome to you. The entire hiring experience relies on chemistry. I would guess that forum posters would not make anything but glowing comments about the various "star escorts" due to the expected backlash that would occur if they did. That is not to say the guys you listed are anything but stellar, but it is to say that forum favorites are looked upon differently than other guys. PS: I put "star escorts" in quotes because I don't think the listed escorts would consider themselves to be stars.

Let's take a look at this review through the lens of issues and concerns that are posted to these forums every day: Experience: Recommended by another escort I already knew, Trophyhusband (TH) much prefers direct phone contact to communicate. The majority of threads on the topic of "communication" express a strong preference to telephone contact. This statement indicates the escort prefers phone contact. Good thing to know if a prospective client likes to make phone contact rather than text or eail contact, especially those who will not book an appointment without a phone conversation. Texting the number is an acceptable second place and email comes in a distant third! See above As always, please be patient for a reply if he doesn't answer. I have lost count of the number of times posters have complained about slow responses. This is very good information for those who want an immediate response (maybe find someone else) and those who obsess over a delayed response. TH is a Texas native and is very much a 100% masculine good ol' boy. Very casual, friendly, chatty, and very eager to have fun and hang out. One of the topics that comes up over and over again is escort's masculinity and ability to converse. Both questions answered in the review. The ad pictures match, but he does look better and younger in person. Having participated in this forum for 10 years and lurked for years before that, I've found the question of an escort looking like his pictures is probably the number one question on this forum. Now we know he looks like his pics. Most of these ad pictures are unposed, quicky selfies. Another frequent topic is that of over-posed, photoshopped pics. Apparently, not a problem here. TH is definitely not a highly-groomed, tweezed, GQ-model type. Very real and very unpretentious. He's not a muscle freak, but has the look of a regular in-shape dude in his early 30s. Many guys are looking for a model type while others want a "regular guy." This helps both groups of potential clients determine whether TH is the right guy for them. Interaction with TH will very much depend on the ol' "chemistry" thing. If you're a cool guy and having fun, are respectful and nice, you'll probably have a great time with TH. Sounds like TH might not be a match for every potential client. Good for them to know. Helps to avoid making a hiring mistake. He's definitely more than "stand and pose". As usual, be discreet about discussing expectations before and during the meet. Another frequently asked question is what to say to an escort when contacting him. This reviewer has answered that question. Be discrete. I'm not much into kissing or anal with anybody and I had a fantastic time with TH. I got all I wanted out of the meeting. We both had a couple cheap beers down in the lobby and talked a lot about the business and stuff. Like every review, this review captures the reviewer's experience. This reviewer wanted to hang out and have a beer. Another reviewer might want to be forced into get throat-f*&^ed. It sounds like it accurately described the experience this reviewer was looking for. He's busy with other projects in LA, so be patient contacting TH. If you like a very casual, friendly, good-looking, guy-next-door dude, TH is your man. Sounds like a good summary to me.

I wish I had some information to share, but I don't. However, I'm interested in what others have to say, as I think he is sexy and could be a potential hire.

yeah yeah, but, but, but, but...

Very nice.

I'm glad to hear this positive feedback, as I have considered hiring him but was always a bit hesitant. Thanks guys!

On behalf of the San Diego Convention and Visitor's Bureau, I invite them to visit and find out for themselves. Or watch Oprah.

Nate in LA. He is out of town until Thanksgiving, but if you can wait he is definitely worth it. http://www.men4rentnow.com/gay/escort/male/massage/los_angeles/YourHunk/166079 Matt Stevens is also a lot of fun http://www.men4rentnow.com/gay/escort/male/massage/miami_beach/MATTStevens/134362

Yeah, but, but, but... Actually, he has a nice hairy butt.

I'm going to get all woo-woo Coastal Southern California here, so feel free to skip this statement if that sort of thing is an irritant. I find it interesting that you use the word "disclose" in relation to yourself. To me, it speaks of shame and guilt. How about tweaking the sentence and use the word "share" instead?

Unless the statute has changed, Chicago's municipal code prohibits nudity in a venue where alcohol is served.

I have recently started sharing my stats with escorts because I am very tall. Although I don't consider 6'4" to be freakishly unusual, many guys have had a surprised look and comment on my height when they open the door. I usually tell them that I will be shorter when I am on my back and we both laugh, but for some guys the height difference is a real issue. In terms of communicating expectations, it seems only fair to explain what you want when hiring. How else is the escort supposed to know what you are looking for?

I was able to access them by clicking on them, but that was a few weeks ago. He might have changed the privacy setting after I unlocked them.

His ad contains seven pictures. The clothed picture is public and the other six are semi-private. As a premium member I can see all of them. Non-premium members are able to request access to them. Prior to having a premium membership, I always asked for access to the private pics when I was interested in hiring. On the occasions where the escort would not unlock the private pics, I crossed him off the list and moved forward.

I'm curious: why is 1 clothed photo a warning sign?

I agree, but the OP mentioned his type charged $300 - $400.

Here in Southern California there are escorts who charge $300 and $400 per hour. There are also escorts who charge between $200 and $250. I haven't done a rate distribution analysis, but a quick scan of ads indicates the majority of escorts who list a rate charge between $200 and $275 per hour, not including multi-hour discounts. At the risk of sounding like a picky statistics, math, language, and vocabulary wonk (which I am) you really can't extrapolate rates charged by a certain "type" across the entire population of escorts and deem it a "norm." That method could easily be used to claim $150 is the new norm if one's "type" charged $150 an hour. However, your statement would be 100% accurate if it read "Increasing number of escorts charging $300 - $400."

I would stop at "Please would you cum inside of me while you're fucking me? It's a real turn on." If he can and does cum in your ass, give him a nice tip, if you are so inclined.