411 on SethM

[Guest TheOtherGuy]

https://rentmen.eu/SethM

I feel like I have seen a thread on him under a different name. Can't remember though.

Anyone?

[Guest TheOtherGuy]

bump. Anyone?

[TopVolt]

Bump

[Guest TheOtherGuy]

I did reach out to someone who reviewed him poorly on RM and said he was "soft serve". That's all I was ever able to find out.

[+ azdr0710]

I did reach out to someone who reviewed him poorly on RM and said he was "soft serve". That's all I was ever able to find out.

 

in this case, was the RM reviewer suggesting he was a bit effeminate?....or couldn't/wouldn't get hard?.....or what?.....thanks

[InterestingGuy]

I did reach out to someone who reviewed him poorly on RM and said he was "soft serve". That's all I was ever able to find out.

 

Considering that he emphasizes several times (and in two languages) that he's a Top only, "Soft Serve" is probably the worst review he can get.

[Guest TheOtherGuy]

in this case, was the RM reviewer suggesting he was a bit effeminate?....or couldn't/wouldn't get hard?.....or what?.....thanks

Soft serve as in what he was serving was soft. As in it wasn't hard.

[CAlivin]

He's not effeminate and very handsome in person with a beautiful cock. I would pass on him though. Very mechanical and was reluctant on oral. Even worse, he couldn't maintain an erection.

[Wanderoz]

So it was all custard in the end?