todays reviews

[BobbyB]

>His brother was a real hottie and loved to be blown. He knew

>the younger brother was gay and liked to suck cock. The older

>"allowed" the younger to suck him off for $$$. I think he

>charged him about $20 each time it happened and it happened

>regularly about once a week for years.

>

>Haven't seen either of them for years - wonder what became of

>them.

 

One became a client and posts regularly on the MC and the other advertises on Rentboy?

 

RandyRon

 

 

ROTFLMFAO!!!!

 

-BobbyB

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

RE: Leading with the gut or the head?

 

>>So you base your conclusions about the ability of the wider

>>gay world to manage their sex lives on our microcosm

>community

>>selected because of our interest in hiring escorts as a

>>significant component of our sex lives?

>

>Two things. First, as you can see from the quote from my

>earlier post shown above, that isn't what I said.

 

I know but what you did say prompted me to pose the question. Thanks for clarifying your position. It seems to narrow the thrust of your comment.

 

> Second, a "significant component of our sex lives"? What are t

>he other components?

 

Well, the NSA hook-up comes to mind as does casual dating and even courtship in some instances.

 

>A small minority distinguished from the majority by its

>willingness to be involved in prostitution, certainly. But

>what reason do you have to think we are distinguished by

>anything else?

 

I suspect that being in the segment has implications for a difference in attitudes and self-image, with potentially positive and negative aspects, to name two possibilities. Another is some selection on income level. (Most that cannot afford to hire don't dwell on it I suspect.) With that goes some correlation in education level I would imagine. There may be others.

[woodlawn]

RE: Leading with the gut or the head?

 

>I suspect that being in the segment has implications for a

>difference in attitudes and self-image, with potentially

>positive and negative aspects, to name two possibilities.

>Another is some selection on income level. (Most that cannot

>afford to hire don't dwell on it I suspect.) With that goes

>some correlation in education level I would imagine. There

>may be others.

 

You suspect. You imagine. I asked what REASON you have. Don't see any so far.

[dcbikeracer]

sick!!

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

RE: Leading with the gut or the head?

 

>

>>I suspect that being in the segment has implications for a

>>difference in attitudes and self-image, with potentially

>>positive and negative aspects, to name two possibilities.

>>Another is some selection on income level. (Most that cannot

>>afford to hire don't dwell on it I suspect.) With that goes

>>some correlation in education level I would imagine. There

>>may be others.

>

>You suspect. You imagine. I asked what REASON you have.

>Don't see any so far.

>

 

Well, because I don't have hard statistics in hand I didn't want to be called for overstating my case... thus I suspect and imagine. I'm satisfied that my point was made.

[woodlawn]

RE: Whose right?

 

>I for one don't care what straight people think of me. I don't

>need or desire approval from them (or any of you for that

>matter). I feel my attitude is the right one for me. If my

>right to marry, or whatever else is held up because some

>asshole politician thinks I'm a pervert, then we have a fight

>on our hands.

 

Given the results of the last election, it's a fight you seem to be losing. There were eleven different states in which the voters passed ballot measures against same-sex marriage by substantial majorities.

 

You might want to devote some thought to what it is you're fighting about. Your "right to marry"? Where does that "right" come from? Do you believe there is a supernatural being who has established a set of "rights" to which all humans are entitled? Absent the religious explanation, a "right" is simply an agreement among members of a community about the way they will treat each other in certain situations. When you think about "rights" that way, you realize that the only way to obtain a "right to marry" or any other "right" is to persuade most of the other members of your community to agree to it. How do you do that -- by fighting with them about it?