Does it make sense to send in reviews now, March 2017?

[BaronArtz]

I had a very positive experience with a masseur here in NYC and would like to write a review. Does it make sense to do it now, being that the site is under reconstruction so to speak. Thank you.

[+ azdr0710]

you can, of course, link his ad, only say it was a great meeting, and offer to answer PMs....(may want to create a form letter for that?)

[TruthBTold]

I agree. I might also add that he looks like his pics (unless that is implied in the "great meeting" aspect of what you write).

[Guy Fawkes]

Yes.

 

I had a very positive experience with a masseur here in NYC and would like to write a review. Does it make sense to do it now, being that the site is under reconstruction so to speak. Thank you.

[MileHigh]

Who is the masseur you are talking about so we know?

[BaronArtz]

Who is the masseur you are talking about so we know?

 

Ethan #2 in New York City.

[gallahadesquire]

Ethan #2 in New York City.

Site?

[+ azdr0710]

https://www.daddysreviews.com/review/ethan_2_nyc

 

https://www.masseurfinder.com/members/ethan_nyc.shtml

[BaronArtz]

Yes.

 

Thanks. Does the review need to be 'sanitized'? In other words, no description of the male anatomy and/or the range of activities? Are there guidelines somewhere on this site?

[+ Axiom2001]

Thanks. Does the review need to be 'sanitized'? In other words, no description of the male anatomy and/or the range of activities? Are there guidelines somewhere on this site?

 

After receiving "Daddy's" message in January regarding his revamping and editing previous reviews which have been logged for years-- I came to the conclusion that future reviews must be general and "sanitized"-- and if we here wanted specifics, those would have to be obtained from the reviewer. At the www.rentmen.com site, the host decided not to include any written specifics in his reviews that he'd posted. Helpful? No! So one just has to chance it.

 

Since we can pm each other-- that's quite helpful indeed!

[+ glennnn]

Well put, one and all. A short, more general revue, positive or negative can be posted here with a more comprehensive review possibly available via Private Message. (Must learn how to post from a digital source to avoid retyping the complete critique more than once.) I'm game! Am I understanding it correctly? Does the forum and it's editorial/ management staff approve?

[Guy Fawkes]

Daddy has not been publishing explicit reviews for about a year.

Thanks. Does the review need to be 'sanitized'? In other words, no description of the male anatomy and/or the range of activities? Are there guidelines somewhere on this site?