Alessadro in NYC

[hornytwells]

Puts ? down...

 

At the risk of being corrected as a child, I have to agree with what @hypothetically 's posts. I have never partied, but have been with a few guys that do. Side bar, 2 never mentioned it in thier profiles. I always ask if someone parties, and the OP, may want to do the same.

Now, when I ask, I make sure to say that I don't care if they do but don't want that to be the case when we meet. I don't judge and sure as hell not going to let, what someone does in their personal time, inhibit me from meeting someone I'm attracted too and could potentially really click with.

I'm super glad that I don't because I would have deprived myself from meeting some amazing kind and caring people.

I dont disagree in principal with your post or actually with hypothetically. I took issue with the condescending

tone of the reply, as I thought we both had valid points. He was the one who felt it necessary to “lay it out as if for a child”. Just because someone may have a differing view does not equate to “lack of comprehension” skills. Thats the kind of argument Trump uses.

[hypothetically]

I dont disagree in principal with your post or actually with hypothetically. I took issue with the condescending

tone of the reply, as I thought we both had valid points. He was the one who felt it necessary to “lay it out as if for a child”. Just because someone may have a differing view does not equate to “lack of comprehension” skills. Thats the kind of argument Trump uses.

 

You’re not hiring the fellow. The end.

[BaronArtz]

Can we have better spelling please?

 

"in thier profiles" = in their profiles

 

'in principal" = in principle

 

Thank you.

Edited March 14, 2019 by BaronArtz

[+ EVdude]

Can we have better spelling please?

"in thier profiles" = in their profiles

'in principal" = in principle

Thank you.

Perhaps the principal was being topped?

[hypothetically]

Can we have better spelling please?

 

"in thier profiles" = in their profiles

 

'in principal" = in principle

 

Thank you.

 

Seniority/thread count and proper grammar do not go hand-in-hand around these parts, I’ve learned.

[BaronArtz]

Seniority/thread count and proper grammar do not go hand-in-hand around these parts, I’ve learned.

 

Thank you for noticing that. I know my comment was petty, but I was attempting to stay with the "as I’ve laid it out for a child" tone of this thread.

[tanman4u]

Am sorry if I missed your point-but your question to me was "what relevance does his love of partying have on his ability to give a good massage"? I was trying to answer that question. If you think someone who is high will give as good and competent a massage as someone who isn't then maybe it's not just my comprehension that is lacking here.

 

Well, actually, I'd expect to get a better massage if the masseur (and hopefully me) were both high but I'm also restricting that to weed.

[hornytwells]

Well, actually, I'd expect to get a better massage if the masseur (and hopefully me) were both high but I'm also restricting that to weed.

Then he may well be the one for you!

[Mr. Jones]

I've never met anyone that said they partied that wasn't talking about crystal meth. Which affects people even when they aren't high. Maybe it's just the part of the world I live in, it may mean other substances other places.