Jump to content

Nick Sterling 3rd review and response. The client coulda woulda shoulda?


marylander1940
This topic is 3234 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted
Well, the escort’s response seems quite honest and genuine. He doesn’t dispute anything in the review, not even that he may have decided to leave early. Do you think every review has to be an unpaid promotional advertisement for the escort?

 

no... do you mean to tell me all reviews should be positive?

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
Keep in mind, communication is a two-way street. In the review/response we’re discussing, it seems that both the client and the escort talk more about what wasn’t discussed rather than what was. The client does mention, however, that he discussed a certain fetish (as well as kissing and cuddling) with the escort, so the escort agreed to the session knowing these expectations, but he wasn’t able to pretend he was into it to the satisfaction of the client. And, to top it off, he made the decision to leave before the session was over. Maybe the escort shouldn’t have agreed to the session.

 

Just wondered, in general, if an escort can always be sure that he takes the time to ask whether the client has the normal expectations of a session or to tell the client that the escort will not do certain things. Rather than expecting a client to always ask questions or to reveal certain things. For instance, whether the client expects to be a top or bottom or wants a little of both. Or whether the client expects there to be kissing and to be sure to tell the client that it will only closed-mouth if that is all there will be. The escort should probably note that there will be safe sex only, if that is the case. I am sure there are many other areas I am missing. In many cases, clients are self-conscious about contacting an escort and will forget to ask about certain things. It behooves an escort to make sure that really important things are discussed. As noted above, the client here does not say what the escort did not do that was explicitly discussed. I am not sure if disclosure over communications make an escort criminally liable in some way. It just seems all parties would know about what won't be done when the client gets there and there would be less likelihood for confusion. Then again it may all be too much.

Posted
The response really didn't cover the issues at hand. It was more self-promotion than anything else.

 

Communication is key here but as a shy client I find stopping a session with an escort to re-tool a major buzz kill so I don't do it. I'm probably in the wrong though.

I'm in that camp too, I've only done that a few times; one had a lot of red flags from the start (a guy who could not get past "mild domination" does not equal "body worship"). That one I just stopped after about 20 minutes. After that, I saw another guy and tried to make sure I didn't make the same mistake, but turned into the same session. I've gotten much clearer in stating expectations since those two.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...