No show escort has my personal information...

[YoungAD]

What about posting his name and ad on here?

 

Saying XX didn't show up on the title of he thread, could that work.

Escorts are crtitiqued on here all the time without appointments. If I were an escort and received about twenty or so inquiries asking "is this true?" I might reconsider my refund policy and issue a statement to clarify what happened. Perhaps it is all a big "misunderstanding."

[ddrjdc]

Thank you to those who had positive and constuctive things to add to the conversation, I appreciate it very much. I will email Daddy directly as outlined in the FAQ. I will let him know the escort involved in case there is a pattern that should be made public. Again, thank you for the positive feed back and well wishes!! Take Care.

[YoungAD]

...in case there is a pattern that should be made public.

 

So this thread was created to talk up a negative experience and warn us all about being stood up and cheated by a particular well-known but unnamed escort who just decided to hell with it one night (twice) and "if there is a pattern" we will be informed.

 

Is anyone else confused? How is there supposed to be a pattern of bad behavior established if we do not know who this is or what happened exactly?

[Strafe13]

So this thread was created to talk up a negative experience and warn us all about being stood up and cheated by a particular well-known but unnamed escort who just decided to hell with it one night (twice) and "if there is a pattern" we will be informed.

 

Is anyone else confused? How is there supposed to be a pattern of bad behavior established if we do not know who this is or what happened exactly?

 

Those are the forum's rules, I guess. It looks like Daddy will have to make the call as to whether the OP will be allowed to submit a review and/or reveal the escort's identity.

 

And I was never sure what additional details you needed from the OP. He said what happened from his point of view, and left out the escort's name and location apparently because he wasn't sure of this site's protocol. It's not a terribly complicated story, so I'm not sure how additional details would matter much in establishing its validity. Either the escort no-showed (twice) after accepting his fee in advance, or he didn't.

[BaronArtz]

On the MSS site, there was a discussion of an escort who took pictures of a client's credit cards while he was in the bath room. Phones nowadays ... you just can't be careful enough with personal information.

[LADoug1]

So if I understand the rules correctly, if someone asks about the escort in question, the OP can divulge the problems his had with said escort either on the forum or via PM. But otherwise the OP can't just proactively warn us. I wish the rules allowed this.

[+ quoththeraven]

So if I understand the rules correctly, if someone asks about the escort in question, the OP can divulge the problems his had with said escort either on the forum or via PM. But otherwise the OP can't just proactively warn us. I wish the rules allowed this.

 

It's not so much the rules that are the issue. The OP is afraid of retaliation because the escort has his personal information. People also get pushback from an escort's friends and fans when one is named. And of course the escort can always become a forum member (if he isn't already) and chime in.

 

Plenty of no-show escorts have been named in the forum either off the bat or in response to 411s. The problem here is that keeping an unearned fee looks like thievery. I don't know how management would feel about having the person's name revealed in that instance without their input. The best way to find out is to e-mail [email protected]. (At least I think that is the email address.) From what I understand, that is in essence what's happening.

[Juan Vancouver]

This is so sad.

 

I just learnt from a client who went through exactly the same situation. To make things worse, I worked a couple times with the escort in question and I thought he was a nice, professional guy.

 

I breaks my heart but I think the only way to deal with this is to write a concise review and provide the necessary proof so that daddy feels it ok to publish it.

 

Best of luck in your next hires.

[BallerBoy]

What's done is done. Look ahead and keep it moving. Going forward, use a Google Voice phone number instead, and trust no one!

[LADoug1]

It's not so much the rules that are the issue. The OP is afraid of retaliation because the escort has his personal information. People also get pushback from an escort's friends and fans when one is named. And of course the escort can always become a forum member (if he isn't already) and chime in.

 

Plenty of no-show escorts have been named in the forum either off the bat or in response to 411s. The problem here is that keeping an unearned fee looks like thievery. I don't know how management would feel about having the person's name revealed in that instance without their input. The best way to find out is to e-mail [email protected]. (At least I think that is the email address.) From what I understand, that is in essence what's happening.

I guess then it's too sneaky to post a thread in the Deli about a 411 on the escort in question to see if anyone else has had the same problem. A roundabout way to bring the escort's reliability to light.

[BabyBoomer]

I guess then it's too sneaky to post a thread in the Deli about a 411 on the escort in question to see if anyone else has had the same problem. A roundabout way to bring the escort's reliability to light.

 

Good idea, but too late at this point.

 

~ Boomer ~

[killianjamesnyc]

So if I understand the rules correctly, if someone asks about the escort in question, the OP can divulge the problems his had with said escort either on the forum or via PM. But otherwise the OP can't just proactively warn us. I wish the rules allowed this.

 

That's not a very good idea. I could only imagine the amount of newbie posters showing up, conjured by the same person, who would be posting all kinds of false information to ruin someone's rep. Not everyone is honest with good intent...you folks need to remember that.

[down_to_business]

That's not a very good idea. I could only imagine the amount of newbie posters showing up, conjured by the same person, who would be posting all kinds of false information to ruin someone's rep. Not everyone is honest with good intent...you folks need to remember that.

 

Or the equally number of newbie posters conjured by the same escort showing up telling how said escort is the most wonderful and most reliable escort in the world. It works both ways!

[killianjamesnyc]

Or the equally number of newbie posters conjured by the same escort showing up telling how said escort is the most wonderful and most reliable escort in the world. It works both ways!

 

Well that's also very obvious. But at least you know what that's about and can just sit back and laugh about it. However when it's the other way around I could see it being more harmful. But whatevs.

[down_to_business]

Well that's also very obvious. But at least you know what that's about and can just sit back and laugh about it. However when it's the other way around I could see it being more harmful. But whatevs.

 

Sorry Killian were you saying something? I got distracted trying to figure out where exactly my forehead lines up and touches in relation to your tattoo.

 

Point taken, don't believe everything you read on an anonymous message board, especially from newbies.