Jump to content

Lots of 'Just Updated"s on masseurfinder.com


chirob
This topic is 3812 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just checked both the sensual and custom sections for masseurfinder.com in my city (Chicago) and it seems about 1/4 to 1/3 of the masseurs have a "JUST UPDATED" label on their ads. It popped up since yesterday morning, and looking at LA and NYC it seems to have happened there as well. Is mf having the masseurs change their ads like massagem4m did a while back? (at least the ones that had certain words in them)

Posted

Lots of pictures have been changed with the masseurs in Los Angeles. Pictures that used to show the whole body (clothed or not) now only show the torso. Obviously, MF told their masseurs to tone down their ads, likely in response to something.

Posted

I'm sure they were told to "tone it down," as firecracker says. The reviews have been edited, also. I submitted some that were either rejected or redacted. There was a post a few weeks ago that explained how the servers were getting after MF and M4M.

Posted

Masseurfinder just changed policy. You used to be able to get a password to unlock photos. Now you have to ask the masseur to email you the private photos. You can't see them on the site.

Posted

A friend of mine who advertises on Masseurfinder told me that he received an e-mail just the other day, ordering him to remove some photos, which were NOT AT ALL EROTIC. He had to replace one with a full-length photo showing him from the rear, wearing no shirt and jeans. Yes, there is a crackdown on all these sites -- both masseur ads and client reviews.

Posted
Even the private nude ones that people paid for?

 

I checked a few that I [aid for -- and they are still there but one wonders for how much longer. I looked up two or three guys I have seen, and their ample photos have been pared down to a modest (in every sense) two or three. I wonder if this is not in anticipation with the attempt by the FCC (and Obama Administration) to change internet policy??? I would not be surprised.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...