411 on Rafael Carreras

[dutchal]

Coming to NYC: http://www.rentboy.com/Listing.aspx?lid=252164

[BabyBoomer]

Coming to NYC: http://www.rentboy.com/Listing.aspx?lid=252164

 

FYI. Just in case it matters to you, he barebacks.

~Boomer ~

[jimboivyo]

FYI. Just in case it matters to you, he barebacks.

~Boomer ~

 

would matter to me. folks who have no care for their own well being have no place in my company, condom or no condom

[+ cougar]

would matter to me. folks who have no care for their own well being have no place in my company, condom or no condom

 

Jimboivyo - That is the most perfect response to that barebacking fact that I have seen that also fits my sentiments. Well said!

[Guest countryboywny]

would matter to me. folks who have no care for their own well being have no place in my company, condom or no condom

 

Hitting the proverbial "nail on the head" +1

[Edward]

To each their own. I probably would not hire someone that BB. However, you have to treat every person you meet as if they have done BB.

 

 

person you a does BB.

[TruthBTold]

would matter to me. folks who have no care for their own well being have no place in my company, condom or no condom

 

Although I would not (except in lengthy lover situations) BB with anyone, I would not necessarily discount someone who I know to have barebacked based simply on that fact. I would adjust my sexual behavior to take into consideration that I know that he has done so as opposed to just presuming he has done so. And actually not a lot of adjustment is necessary because in either case condom use is mandatory. However, I don't think that I would totally exclude the person from my company simply based on the fact that he has barebacked (again presuming precautions would be taken) any more than I would totally exclude a person who smokes just because he has "no care for their own well being." And, of course, I understand that I could not catch a sexually transmitted disease from someone who smokes, but the criteria put forth was that the potential partner simply did not take care of their body as opposed to wanting to bareback me. And, I certainly understand that this is only my opinion.

[jimboivyo]

You can discount the bb any way you want to yourself, but at the end of the road he's insane-stupid enough to not give a good god damn about his health

 

If you don't care about yourself then I don't really care about you

[bigvalboy]

Although I would not (except in lengthy lover situations) BB with anyone, I would not necessarily discount someone who I know to have barebacked based simply on that fact. I would adjust my sexual behavior to take into consideration that I know that he has done so as opposed to just presuming he has done so. And actually not a lot of adjustment is necessary because in either case condom use is mandatory. However, I don't think that I would totally exclude the person from my company simply based on the fact that he has barebacked (again presuming precautions would be taken) any more than I would totally exclude a person who smokes just because he has "no care for their own well being." And, of course, I understand that I could not catch a sexually transmitted disease from someone who smokes, but the criteria put forth was that the potential partner simply did not take care of their body as opposed to wanting to bareback me. And, I certainly understand that this is only my opinion.

 

Well said....