Jump to content

More on Vinnie from Chicago


bigshooter
This topic is 4381 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted

Last week i posted a comment on Vinnie from Chicago in an effort to HELP others who may be interested in hiring this guy. but i was chastised by daddy

 

Admin note: Next time, take the hint.

Posted
Last week i posted a comment on Vinnie from Chicago in an effort to HELP others who may be interested in hiring this guy. but i was chastised by daddy

 

I like as much information as possible about a potential hire. I imagine most members filter the good and the bad and don't just accept it at face value. For example, an escort with nothing by "First Reviews" raises some doubt in my mind. We're big boys and may take a chance even on someone who has a few negative comments floating around. However, I've not been around long enough to understand the basis for every rule, but thinking about it from Vinnie's point of view shouldn't he be afforded the opportunity to defend himself from an inaccurate review (posted as a review or in a forum)? So, assuming that's the reason for the rule you fell afoul of it seems reasonable to me that your friend should have to join the site (its free) and submit a review if he's really trying to do, as it seems, a good deed for the rest of us. I don't remember how long it took me to join but I'm thinking less than a minute to fill the form out and submit it. Likewise, a review depending on length desired could take 5 minutes? So all in, less than 10 minutes to join and submit a review properly. If you're friend is so interested in doing a good deed by warning us, is 10 minutes (or whatever the short period of time actually is) too much to ask?

 

I'm just a member, but I'd like to let you know that I think its rude to refer to the site owner the way you did. The site is free and members like you and I have no responsibility and make no effort to financially make it available for free to others. Would you go to someone's house for a free meal and then openly/widely bitch about the food? Maybe or maybe not but if you did I'd think you have the problem, not the cook/your host. So I think you should consider that the process for submitting a review appropriately affords the escort the opportunity to find out about it and either prove its outright a lie (i.e., the person submitting the post never tried to or met with the escort) or there is the other side of the story members should be able to read. Imagine for a moment you are the escort in question. Someone lies about about you and you lose business. Who knows if Vinnie is a member or not. I think the review process includes him getting notified so he surely does find out whats been said and he's given the opportunity to defend himself (wow, sounds like a civilized process doesn't it). Not affording him that opportunity is unfair and people like "us" who are members sure know about unfair treatment and therefore shouldn't participate in any.

 

In closing, the owner of this site and the moderators don't (I believe) get rich (or maybe any consideration) for what they do to make this site available to the rest of us so I think its not asking much to show some above average respect to them. Disagree, ok, but "head up their ass" is (in my opinion) absolutely not ok and the only person it reflects poorly on is your anonymous self.

Posted

How are we to know that you aren't simply some jilted lover who is stalking an ex-boyfriend. Because we have had those here. How do we know you aren't a competitor trying to hurt the business of a rival? We've seen that too. You act as if some things don't come up unexpectedly in people's lives and dismiss that as a lie, out of hand. And yet you use the old "my friend" schtick, as if that isn't the oldest canard in the books.

 

The no-show policy is there for a reason -- to allow the escort to respond to a negative review. And whether you like it or not, it is a review. You throw around that you are a lawyer like that is supposed to ensure some sort of integrity and honesty, when lawyers are viewed on honesty somewhere below used car salesmen. A lawyer's job is to lie and obfuscate.

 

So you (or your "friend") got hurt because someone didn't show up. Well man up, cupcake. Shit happens in life. Move on.

Posted

I'm also upset about well known no-shows like Ryan Rose, but I would never write a review or post on here, in behalf of a friend of mine who didn't even met him because the guy made plans with HIM and didn't who up to see HIM (my friend.)

 

One more thing... more respect to Daddy and everyone else who makes this forum possible besides if you are really an Attorney use capital letters when you start a phrase and read before clicking save.

Posted
it seems reasonable to me that your friend should have to join the site (its free) and submit a review if he's really trying to do, as it seems, a good deed

 

Just for the record, nobody has to join anything to submit a review.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...