Anybody Belong To TwinkAcademy?

[Guest Les]

Les,

 

I am pulling these pics for the following reasons.

 

1. There is a question about the age of the model. I do not condone nor promote pedophilia. I am not saying you do, but I want to err on the side of caution.

 

2. The site you are promoting may purchase advertising from me because that is how I keep this site free. You just gave them over a million eyeballs and I have not seen a check come in from you or them either.

 

Carry on.

 

HB

[Guest Les]

Deleted message

 

No message

[Guest Les]

Deleted message

 

No message

[Guest Les]

Deleted message

 

No message

[Guest Les]

Deleted message

 

No message

[Guest Les]

You might have to click some of the red Xs then show picture.:o

[Guest Utopia]

I enjoy the photos you have posted from the site's preview section. I too would like to know if anyone here has membership knowledge.

 

Also, is this strictly a photo site or do they offer live feeds or streaming videos as well?

[jack]

It looks to me like a start up site. I'd give it a year to mature -- expand its photo and video base. Not much now. (That kid sure had a busy day of it).

[BobbyB]

And it looks like a grueling physical. ;-)

 

-BobbyB

[LovesYng]

I wonder if the job as HEAD MASTER is open for Twink Academy. I'm ready for the job..

 

When in doubt I whip it out:+

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

Two Out Of Three Twinks Agree

 

I will certainly have to reasses my own image of what constitute a Twink. That young man looks like he could pass for 14 to me. The Twinks and I however, all agreed the sets were great, the costumes were well thought out and even if they do not have streaming videos, whoever came up with this certainly has imagination.

 

One Twink thought the student should have turned the tables on the older men and forced them to do his bidding (he thinks he is a top, even with a mouth full of pillow). Otherwise, they approved.

[Guest HairyDomBraz27]

RE: Pedophilia masquerading as "twinks"

 

> That young man looks like he could pass

>for 14 to me.

 

NO KIDDING - this is precisely what they like so much about these pictures.

 

It's a way of finding an outlet for their pedophilia - they are sexually attracted to 12-year olds, so they masquerade their pedophilia under the term "twinks" - the younger-looking, the more child-like, the better.

[fedssocr1]

RE: Pedophilia masquerading as "twinks"

 

Some one certainly went to a whole lot of work setting up the graphics and formatting for this thing. And there seems to be a fair amount of imagination behind it too. It's sort of refreshing to see some one put some effort and creativity into porn instead of recycling the same old photo sets.

 

The question is will the thing ever get updates and how much of a database is in place. You can spend $16 a month recurring or $40 for 3 month of $75 for 6 months... I suppose that's about average for these sites.

 

I'd quibble with the "pedophilia" label. This kid is young, but he's not a prepubescent child.

[Guest Les]

RE: Two Out Of Three Twinks Agree

 

>he could pass for 14 to me.

 

Funny thing is I recently had to attend a high school senior class event and the kids were all around 18...some looked 15 and some looked 30.

The girls all seemed much older due to excessive makeup but the boys were truly varied in age appearance. Some looked even younger than this guy. A few of the escorts featured on this site look to be the same age and are frequently ID'ed...as they should be.

I don't think Twink Academy site owner would invest his money in a site that could be so easily shut down for an age infraction, do you?

[Guest Utopia]

RE: Two Out Of Three Twinks Agree

 

I agree Les. The site is based in the US so I doubt they would risk the obvious legal action by featuring underage guys. Any person who has seen several of the hot guys on Squirtz knows one can be over 18 and still look 16.

===

"You realize that life goes fast

It's hard to make the good things last"

[axebahia]

RE: Two Out Of Three Twinks Agree

 

>I agree Les. The site is based in the US so I doubt they

>would risk the obvious legal action by featuring underage

>guys. Any person who has seen several of the hot guys on

>Squirtz knows one can be over 18 and still look 16.

 

I often like Les's posts but this is not the first time where I wondered whether Hoo would take them down. I claim no expertise here but doesn't the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 outlaw images that appear to be of children, even if they re not? In other words, doesn't Hoo run a risk even if the model is 18, but puposefully made to look 16?

 

And while I am at it, Les once posted some pics of guys on Spring Break which did not raise pedophilia concerns, but I thought privacy concerns because I don't think they were taken with consent. Shouldn't those be pulled too?

[axebahia]

RE: Two Out Of Three Twinks Agree

 

Ok, the curiosity was killing me so I checked myself quickly. It seems that that part of the law was found to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court so I guess the actual age of the model is the key part.