Best Town for Escorts

[ad rian]

>Quite a lot of independent guys advertise on the net, though

>I ust confess most are with one or other of the

>brothels/agencies - they all do out-calls as well as

>in-calls. I tend to prefer these guys - (a) they more

>usually have pix, and (b) they have been vetted by the

>brothel-keepers.

 

Are you talking generally or abut Sydney specifically?

[ad rian]

>It's funny that I generally have the opposite reaction. An

>"agency" to me is just an electronic pimp. I don't want to

>deal with a pimp.

 

We have had this conversation here before. The new element, and I think interesting element, is in relation to rating the best towns for escorts. It would help me if people would specify in their ratings whether they are talking about: (1) escorts/hustlers picked up in bars/clubs; (2) escorts met in brothels/saunas; (3) telephone agency escorts with no pictures; (4) on-line agency escorts with no pictures; (5) on-line agency escorts with pictures available; or (6) on-line independant escorts.

 

I can't see how a city can get a top billing if escorts fitting into only categories 1-4 are available. Do none of our Montreal advocates want to justify their position especially since we hear praises of the Montreal so regularly on this Board. From what I can see Montreal fits only categories 1, 2 and maybe 3 with a pinch. I feel less strongly about the Rio advocates here, but it might be useful to hear from them too. For me Rio fits into categories 1 and 2 only. Amsterdam, London and New York seem to fit all 6 categories as well as having price/choice advantages.

[marc anthony]

It would help me if people

>would specify in their ratings whether they are talking

>about: (1) escorts/hustlers picked up in bars/clubs; (2)

>escorts met in brothels/saunas; (3) telephone agency escorts

>with no pictures; (4) on-line agency escorts with no

>pictures; (5) on-line agency escorts with pictures

>available; or (6) on-line independant escorts.

>

>I can't see how a city can get a top billing if escorts

>fitting into only categories 1-4 are available. Do none of

>our Montreal advocates want to justify their position

>especially since we hear praises of the Montreal so

>regularly on this Board. From what I can see Montreal fits

>only categories 1, 2 and maybe 3 with a pinch.

 

Ad rian: I agree that your breakdown is a thorough one. However, I don't necessarily agree that you have to have all components to be the best city. I think you can be so excellent in one or two departments as to negate the need for the others.

 

The strip club scene in Montreal is so unique and so complete an experience to me, that I have never missed nor needed the components of online agencies or online independents. There really is no city in the world that I have been to that has the variety and easy accessibility of literally hundreds of beautiful boys of all types ready and willing to please you, ALL IN ONE PLACE. For me, I like the fact that you can "test drive" the boy, both looks and personality for a long time (back room dances) before you take them back home with you. And because I like twinks and hangout in the Taboo club where the boys tend to be both friendly and predominantly gay, I have never had a private that didn't live up to promised expectations.

 

Because of this setup, I like it best as a city for hiring. I really can spend a week there, and never feel the urge to hookup with anyone online.

 

That having been said, I reiterate my initial post that I love NYC as well. That is the opposite situation for me. There are no strip clubs for twinks there, but the online opportunities are endless! I love them both, though both are not "complete", but if I had to choose one (just on the basis of boys), I would visit Montreal.

[ad rian]

>The strip club scene in Montreal is so unique and so

>complete an experience to me, that I have never missed nor

>needed the components of online agencies or online

>independents. There really is no city in the world that I

>have been to that has the variety and easy accessibility of

>literally hundreds of beautiful boys of all types ready and

>willing to please you, ALL IN ONE PLACE. For me, I like the

>fact that you can "test drive" the boy, both looks and

>personality for a long time (back room dances) before you

>take them back home with you. And because I like twinks and

>hangout in the Taboo club where the boys tend to be both

>friendly and predominantly gay, I have never had a private

>that didn't live up to promised expectations.

 

Ok, I appreciate your point of view but I guess I have a difficulty giving an equivalent rank to a city where I can go on line, find what I want, and have him, and a city where I have to go to a club, chat with him, and at the end of the day I may or may not have him at his discretion. That's a bit too much like dating as opposed to escorting for my tastes.

[sdg]

damn, and i was saving my pennies to go to rio!

[Guest Armand Tesla]

I think that Philly has gotten a bum rap. Sure Premier has a monopoly, but they have some real cute guys(Brent,Sebastian,Christian,etc.). And at a great price!

 

NYC and LA definitely are the winners though. I drool whenever I check out the agencie pics from those two cities! So many men, so little time!:9

[Spida]

Just wondering what city is best for hiring escorts? Does one city have better selection? Does price make a difference in all cities? Are there cities where you have found that escorts try harder :-)

 

From reading reviews it looks and sounds as though Philidelphia might be a good place. NYC scares me when I am there, I don't know if I am going to get a hustler or what will happen and some of the escorts are very expensive. I live near Boston it seems to be okay. I have hired a total of 2 escorts one was good one was very bad! What about east coast vs West coast??

 

Just wondering..