September 6th Miguel del Toro Review

[+ Gar1eth]

I probably shouldn't get involved here since I've never actually met him. I wanted to meet him during his brief foray into bottoming--but I wasn't quick enough--and he became a strict top again. And while in my earlier years of hiring--I think I vaguely remember meeting a few strict tops--I have since decided it's not worth it for me-I know others feel differently--but gosh darn it--I'm a top. I may not be a great one--but if I can I want to at least attempt it.

 

But back to the topic of this thread-in many cases I have no problems believing the reviewer--in this case however I have to wonder if the reviewer either made some type of mistake or met someone posing as Miguel. While I haven't actually met Miguel, I have had numerous involved texts with him over the last 3 years-and he has always "sounded" (texted) very genuine and honest. Also I have met with an escort he mentored--Patrick Taylor. Patrick is a very honest guy-and we talked a little bit about Miguel. Patrick never gave me any hints that Miguel wasn't exactly as how he presented himself in his ad. On top of that I think that all of Miguel's reviews prior to this have been stellar. With all the prior evidence to go on, I am willing to put my faith in Miguel's ad even without meeting him. And I'd still like to meet him--if I could just convince him to surrender a not very important--really a negligible part-- small part of his body. If he did, I would promise to return it in good condition.

 

Gman

[Diverdan]

Hey Gman... from one top to another... I have found that it is very possible for two tops to have a lot of fun together, and some "top only" escorts have been willing to experiment with the other side of things... so, I encourage you to proceed... and, for what it is worth, I have never met Miguel either, but found this review very hard to swallow... no pun intended! Thanks for this post.

[seeker630]

I noticed that the latest reviewer claimed that Miguel was much shorter than advertised, whereas none of the other reviews mentioned that he didn't match his description.

 

Really makes me wonder if the reviewer actually met Miguel.

[rossthebosssf]

Having met him a few times in San Francisco I can say that he is very genuine and very good at what he does. His stats are also very accurate. Sounds like foul play to me or a mistake of identity. I suppose now would be a good time to write a positive review as he does deserve one.

[TruthBTold]

I tried to link to the homesite listed in his reviews but it would not go thru.

[seeker630]

I tried to link to the homesite listed in his reviews but it would not go thru.

 

The links bring up his Rentboy ad, for me.

[+ glutes]

Toothless Toro??

 

Mike The Bull has been addressed before, he should be treated with caution...

 

http://www.companyofmen.org/showthread.php?71625-Miguel-SEA-SFO&highlight=miguel

[rossthebosssf]

There is no caution, Glutes. You were already proven wrong. Not sure why you keep wanting to shit on Miguel. He's a very good Escort. Just leave him alone.

[+ Gar1eth]

There is no caution, Glutes. You were already proven wrong. Not sure why you keep wanting to shit on Miguel. He's a very good Escort. Just leave him alone.

 

No fair Ross-- I was about to make a similar comment about Glutes- but you beat me to it. Now Glutes- why did you feel the need to bring back from the dead a thread you started on Miguel back in 2009. In that thread you quoted a mysterious technology inept client-one 'Spot' by name- who has never made an appearance since I don't believe. Now Mr. Spot-I don't know him, but I've heard the name oh yes- and what he is doing now, I can only guess-- but oh Mr. Spot may be a blemish on the face of our dear Forum...-- by proxy- Mr. Spot made 2 claims- one that Miguel was toothless-- well that's been shot down. And # 2 that Miguel asked for his fee 1st. And yes we all know that that can be a warning sign. However I'm sure there are multiple of us out here in client land who have had an escort ask for the fee first thing and then have proceeded to have a de--eee--lightful time with our chosen escort. And as Miguel has at least 7 good reviews where this practice was not mentioned. I am willing to give Miguel the benefit of the doubt- and say it's not a usual practice of his- and even if it is- he apparently still gives good service. So to repeat Ross' query- why are you trying to again spread fecal excrement on Miguel when the overwhelming evidence is that he is one of the good guys.

 

Gman

[rossthebosssf]

My apologies dear Gman. Viscounts before Masters!

[orbital sander]

There is no caution, Glutes. You were already proven wrong. Not sure why you keep wanting to shit on Miguel. He's a very good Escort. Just leave him alone.

 

He has his crusades...

[+ glutes]

"No fair Ross-- I was about to make a similar comment about Glutes- but you beat me to it. Now Glutes- why did you feel the need to bring back from the dead a thread you started on Miguel back in 2009."

 

There are many new people here that might not be aware of Michael the Bull.

This escorts freely admits that he asks for money up-front, which most people consider not a good start. A la carte pricing and being a active Madame in SeaTac, well - you (should) get the point.

[Guy Fawkes]

I'll ask again. Would you like to take a vacation?

 

"No fair Ross-- I was about to make a similar comment about Glutes- but you beat me to it. Now Glutes- why did you feel the need to bring back from the dead a thread you started on Miguel back in 2009."

 

There are many new people here that might not be aware of Michael the Bull.

This escorts freely admits that he asks for money up-front, which most people consider not a good start. A la carte pricing and being a active Madame in SeaTac, well - you (should) get the point.