Card Carryin'

[Guest in yer face]

RE: Molotov (oh please)

 

YADDA YADDA YADDA!!

 

Is it me, or does this guys psychotic quasi-politico rambling read like the side of a Dr. Bronners Peppermint Oil Soap label?

 

It must be hard to get a decent internet connection living in that shack deep in the woods. Or perhaps you live in your mothers basement? Either scenerio is feasible.

 

Either way, there will be no cards, no businesses. Nothing. Good ideas rarely work, bad ideas tend to fail (except in the case of Britney Spears, dont know how that happend, but I digress).

 

I doubt that you didnt know what you would be starting with this thread. I see nowthat you are a common troll, and I did play right into it. Therefore, you win. End of conversation for me.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>I must confess that my original post was composed to

>intentionally start a bar fight, like...well, like a girl

>who knows how to flirt with two guys at once. I worked long

>and hard to get just the right callow tone that I thought

>might bring the bullies out of the woodwork and thus get

>your attention. Socratic irony is still such an effective

>rhetorical tool.

>

>And boy has "in yer face" ever delivered in spades. I knew

>mention of a "card" and a "business" would really get

>somebody all hopped up and frothing at the mouth. You are

>all I hoped for and more, IYF.

>

>You defend something that is in essence purely unethical.

>Casting escorts who lie about their HIV status as people

>with RIGHTS to be protected betrays a complete lack of

>understanding towards the responsibilities of freedom. This

>confuses the other issues you have mentioned, which have to

>do with the rights of individuals to have private medical

>records. The white house just torpedoed those rights with an

>executive order, by the way. All they have to do is send you

>a letter, and if you don't respond THEY CAN TURN OVER YOUR

>RECORDS TO THOSE WHO REQUEST THEM. Throw the letter away as

>junk mail and you're fuct.

>

>Ad rian, you are a classic hero. You saw the sub-problem and

>stuck to your guns the whole way. I salute you sir.

>

>HIV poz escorts should RETIRE!!! It's your responsibility

>as a sex worker. And if they don't then they should be

>FORCED TO by the authorities. The problem of HIV poz

>clients is tougher. But that doesn't mean you can't start at

>one end of the equation and work eastward. Perhaps if we

>TALK ABOUT IT MORE in a non-hysterical way we could come up

>with a solution that could be implemented in a mercantile

>democracy such as our own.

>

>In my opinion, prostitution should be legalized and

>regulated. Bring back the brothel. At least there was a

>visible authority figure to negotiate with when there is a

>dispute. The current agency system is merely an answering

>service. In Yer Face is an ambivalent enabler and the

>current system is unacceptable. That's why I brought up

>Australia, which has sensible laws regarding escorts and

>hence, brothels.

>

>Now, answer me this: the government is ALREADY quietly

>targeting escorts as a health risk. John Ashcroft (a real

>live religious fascist) is ALREADY trying to find a way to

>get HIV poz escorts off the streets/internet. I'm sure Herr

>Ashcroft would shut all sex workers down, if he could figure

>out a way to do it. We're ALREADY LIVING with fascists at

>the top of the government. It's just being kept quiet by the

>people who are doing the rounding up. And good men are

>staying SILENT or in the case of IYF, babbling hysterically.

>If we don't do something about these problems, then right

>wing fascists will do it for us.

>

>The question is: why do liberal democrats defend

>indefensible ethical issues. It just leads to the ultra

>right wing gaining a toehold. Sex workers are going to

>exist. We need sensible regulations. The free market is not

>the best of all possible worlds. Anything with inelastic

>demand is going to cause trouble if it isn’t regulated.

>Hence, deregulated electricity in California (Enron),

>deregulation of the communications industry (WorldCom),

>deregulation of the airlines (they're begging to be

>regulated again), no-regulation of medicine (astronomical

>healthcare costs). How long are we going to let these

>phonies phone in their answers!!!!

>

>So, let's get George Bush OUT of the White House. We need to

>start NOW. Al Gore will LOSE the white house to the

>Republicans again. Let’s not let him get the nomination.

>Anybody know who Howard Dean is? How bout John Edwards? I

>bet some of you do. We need these two guys running this

>country. Let's start NOW. Get Involved. Stay involved. Hold

>their feet to the fire. Evaluate, then reconfigure.

>Trans-value your values.

>

>BTW, I always play safe or not at all.

>

>http://www.vote-smart.com

>

>another time,

>emil lime

>

>p.s. Godiva is a cop, IMHO. One might think that he is

>merely a naked lady on a horse, but he's really " like a box

>of chocolates", where you NEVER KNOW WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO

>GET.

>

>Kind of like life.

[phage]

RE: Molotov

 

> Well, it is so easy for you to say that now after you

>realize how stupid your post was in the first place, but my

>money is still on just plain stupidity (but not so stupid

>that you don't want to try and save face) :+

 

No…I don’t think so. Even as I was responding to the original post, I was thinking, “This guy can’t be serious. The idea of a business certifying HIV status is just dumb.”

 

While I agree with very little that he said above, and it’s the kind of diatribe that makes me cringe to be a liberal, it’s well written and he is obviously too bright to think there is actual merit in the idea.

[taylorky]

RE: Molotov (oh please)

 

vote with the majority AGAIN.........reelect GORE in 2004:-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)

[Guest newawlens]

RE: Molotov

 

If you think electing Dean or Edwards president is going to lead to any change in the legal status of prostitutes, then I would have to revise my opinion of you in line with what IYF said. Surely you can't be that dumb.

 

There have been a lot of discussions of legalization on this message board. It is pretty clear that what escorts who post here want is not legalization and regulation but to have legislatures repeal the criminal laws on prostitution and just leave them alone. We all know that is not about to happen. As for legalizing and regulating prostitution, that would just mean there would still be plenty of prostitutes of both sexes who wouldn't want to comply with the regulations and would continue to operate illegally, not much different from the situation we have now. Voting for one presidential candidate as opposed to another is not going to do anything to change the situation. I suggest you save your energy for a cause that actually has some connection to reality.

[Traveller]

>Maybe if you

>tied a pork chop around your neck?

 

Just one request, please. When posting and using the word "pork," use it only as a verb. Thanks so much.

 

Later.

 

PS. Went back for John again last night. I know DickHo has tried and enthusiastically tried him. What about you, blu?