Study of Catholic priests and sex abuse

[Guest ssn774]

http://www.dallasnews.com/cgi-bin/2002/priests.cgi

 

"Most protected priests were accused of sexually abusing minors - primarily adolescent boys, but also younger ones, and a sizable number of girls of various ages."

[+ deej]

Oh, my gosh! You're Catholic bashing!

[ad rian]

>http://www.dallasnews.com/cgi-bin/2002/priests.cgi

>

>"Most protected priests were accused of sexually abusing

>minors - primarily adolescent boys, but also younger ones,

>and a sizable number of girls of various ages."

 

 

Isn't this true of abusers generally? I would have thought that the sociological evidence on that point is clear by now. This is precisely the point I have beenmaking on the other two threads. Singling out one religion, for cobnclusions that apply across the board only serves to illustrate the biases of the person singling out the one religion. Why that is socially acceptable when it comes to RCs is truly the interesting and courageos question.