bigTom - 4 posts, but he apologizes for everyone

[Guest NakedTony]

>You clearly lack the perspective to define obsession. Your

>carefully chosen words certainly invoke an emotional

>response, but they are devoid of any substance whatsoever.

 

[h3]Whatever.[/h3]

 

Just because you bother to speak doesn't mean it's accurate, objective, or even reasonable. IMHO, you're one sick puppy. x(

[Guest NakedTony]

>You clearly lack the perspective to define obsession. Your

>carefully chosen words certainly invoke an emotional

>response, but they are devoid of any substance whatsoever.

 

[h3]Whatever.[/h3]

 

Just because you bother to speak doesn't mean it's accurate, objective, or even reasonable. IMHO, you're one sick puppy. x(

[BewareofNick]

>>You clearly lack the perspective to define obsession. Your

>>carefully chosen words certainly invoke an emotional

>>response, but they are devoid of any substance whatsoever.

>

>[h3]Whatever.[/h3]

>

>Just because you bother to speak doesn't mean it's accurate,

>objective, or even reasonable. IMHO, you're one sick puppy.

>x(

 

An opinion without anything of substance to back it up is pretty worthless. Care to define your terms, or are you just a soundbite type of guy?

[BewareofNick]

>>You clearly lack the perspective to define obsession. Your

>>carefully chosen words certainly invoke an emotional

>>response, but they are devoid of any substance whatsoever.

>

>[h3]Whatever.[/h3]

>

>Just because you bother to speak doesn't mean it's accurate,

>objective, or even reasonable. IMHO, you're one sick puppy.

>x(

 

An opinion without anything of substance to back it up is pretty worthless. Care to define your terms, or are you just a soundbite type of guy?

[BewareofNick]

>>You clearly lack the perspective to define obsession. Your

>>carefully chosen words certainly invoke an emotional

>>response, but they are devoid of any substance whatsoever.

>

>[h3]Whatever.[/h3]

>

>Just because you bother to speak doesn't mean it's accurate,

>objective, or even reasonable. IMHO, you're one sick puppy.

>x(

 

An opinion without anything of substance to back it up is pretty worthless. Care to define your terms, or are you just a soundbite type of guy?

[Guest NakedTony]

>An opinion without anything of substance to back it up is

>pretty worthless. Care to define your terms, or are you

>just a soundbite type of guy?

 

I'm much more than a soundbite and much smarter than to fall into your trap.

 

[h3]Get a life[/h] or at least a good therapist.

[Guest NakedTony]

>An opinion without anything of substance to back it up is

>pretty worthless. Care to define your terms, or are you

>just a soundbite type of guy?

 

I'm much more than a soundbite and much smarter than to fall into your trap.

 

[h3]Get a life[/h] or at least a good therapist.

[Guest NakedTony]

>An opinion without anything of substance to back it up is

>pretty worthless. Care to define your terms, or are you

>just a soundbite type of guy?

 

I'm much more than a soundbite and much smarter than to fall into your trap.

 

[h3]Get a life[/h] or at least a good therapist.

[Guest regulation]

Given the frequency with which fake reviews are posted on this site, it makes no sense to me to call BON paranoid. No doubt some of his suspicions will prove unwarranted, but every security system sometimes produces false positive results. Airport metal detectors certainly do, but I do not hear anyone suggesting we abandon them for that reason. Keep up the good work, BON!

[Guest regulation]

Given the frequency with which fake reviews are posted on this site, it makes no sense to me to call BON paranoid. No doubt some of his suspicions will prove unwarranted, but every security system sometimes produces false positive results. Airport metal detectors certainly do, but I do not hear anyone suggesting we abandon them for that reason. Keep up the good work, BON!

[Guest regulation]

Given the frequency with which fake reviews are posted on this site, it makes no sense to me to call BON paranoid. No doubt some of his suspicions will prove unwarranted, but every security system sometimes produces false positive results. Airport metal detectors certainly do, but I do not hear anyone suggesting we abandon them for that reason. Keep up the good work, BON!

[BewareofNick]

Considering all the anger and vitriol that comes from your posts, I would suggest some anger management counseling for you before it's too late. And thanks for proving my point that you are all style and no substance

[BewareofNick]

Considering all the anger and vitriol that comes from your posts, I would suggest some anger management counseling for you before it's too late. And thanks for proving my point that you are all style and no substance

[BewareofNick]

Considering all the anger and vitriol that comes from your posts, I would suggest some anger management counseling for you before it's too late. And thanks for proving my point that you are all style and no substance

[BewareofNick]

I don't go looking for these things. I suspected that there was something fishy about bigTom, but I wasn't going to state that until I had something to back it up. While reading through the rest of the message center, I came across the David in Seattle thread and saw bigTom there providing the same excuses for David as he did for Cory. The wording was nearly the same. On that basis, I made my suspicions known. I don't think bigTom hired either one of them. I think he thought it would be fun to defend these questionable escorts and see what happened. Lucky just needs to lighten up, and NakedTony needs to remove the 12 inch dildo from his ass for at least a few hours a day. Thanks for being the voice of reason once again Reg.

[BewareofNick]

I don't go looking for these things. I suspected that there was something fishy about bigTom, but I wasn't going to state that until I had something to back it up. While reading through the rest of the message center, I came across the David in Seattle thread and saw bigTom there providing the same excuses for David as he did for Cory. The wording was nearly the same. On that basis, I made my suspicions known. I don't think bigTom hired either one of them. I think he thought it would be fun to defend these questionable escorts and see what happened. Lucky just needs to lighten up, and NakedTony needs to remove the 12 inch dildo from his ass for at least a few hours a day. Thanks for being the voice of reason once again Reg.

[BewareofNick]

I don't go looking for these things. I suspected that there was something fishy about bigTom, but I wasn't going to state that until I had something to back it up. While reading through the rest of the message center, I came across the David in Seattle thread and saw bigTom there providing the same excuses for David as he did for Cory. The wording was nearly the same. On that basis, I made my suspicions known. I don't think bigTom hired either one of them. I think he thought it would be fun to defend these questionable escorts and see what happened. Lucky just needs to lighten up, and NakedTony needs to remove the 12 inch dildo from his ass for at least a few hours a day. Thanks for being the voice of reason once again Reg.

[Guest alanm]

I am spending a week in SF in a couple of months, so will check out

Corey Sport. I have 5 reviews posted (last being Gabriel in St. Louis posted this week). I also think that BON has gone too far in this thread, but because of his sceptical attitude will be prepared to

find out there is no Corey Sport. But, there is too much detail in my reviews to question any positive comments I might have about Corey Sport. I am clearly not involved in any scam.

[Guest alanm]

I am spending a week in SF in a couple of months, so will check out

Corey Sport. I have 5 reviews posted (last being Gabriel in St. Louis posted this week). I also think that BON has gone too far in this thread, but because of his sceptical attitude will be prepared to

find out there is no Corey Sport. But, there is too much detail in my reviews to question any positive comments I might have about Corey Sport. I am clearly not involved in any scam.

[Guest alanm]

I am spending a week in SF in a couple of months, so will check out

Corey Sport. I have 5 reviews posted (last being Gabriel in St. Louis posted this week). I also think that BON has gone too far in this thread, but because of his sceptical attitude will be prepared to

find out there is no Corey Sport. But, there is too much detail in my reviews to question any positive comments I might have about Corey Sport. I am clearly not involved in any scam.

[BewareofNick]

I would welcome any such review from a legitimate poster such as yourself, Alan.

 

How have I gone too far? I just don't see it.

[BewareofNick]

I would welcome any such review from a legitimate poster such as yourself, Alan.

 

How have I gone too far? I just don't see it.

[BewareofNick]

I would welcome any such review from a legitimate poster such as yourself, Alan.

 

How have I gone too far? I just don't see it.

[Guest DCeBOY]

when are we leaving alanm?

 

you know, to be truly scientific, you should take me along to verify corey. (hmm... or i should at least go to fuck him.)

[Guest DCeBOY]

when are we leaving alanm?

 

you know, to be truly scientific, you should take me along to verify corey. (hmm... or i should at least go to fuck him.)