Jump to content

In Defense of Bitchiness


Guest Thunderbuns
This topic is 8534 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted

>Or small cocks - and let's not ignore lousy blow jobs.

 

No, no, no, no, no.

 

Tb, I realize that you can only attain 100 postings a month through, well, indiscriminate means. But you've missed entirely the point of my post. Which is to say, if you'd slow the fuck down while sitting at your keyboard your intelligence and humor might actually make a contribution to the board, as opposed to these half-thought missives you launch into the realms of shallow and irrelevant half-humor.

 

Small cocks are just fine, because the bearer has no control over same. Lousy dancers and bad blowjobbers are also just fine, because they can be educated.

 

You don't have to go apeshit over small cocks, or bad dancing, but to deride either as inferior is absurd. It's like saying somebody with 400 posts is superior to someone with 100 posts. And that, patently, is a false assumption.

 

(Why hell, you don't even know whether or not the St. Charles is still perating. I haven't lived in Toronto since 1987 and I know the answer to that question.)

 

Wake up. Slow down. Say something that isn't flip and shallow and see how much harder writing a message post becomes.

 

You're welcome.

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest Thunderbuns
Posted

>>Or small cocks - and let's not ignore lousy blow jobs.

>

>No, no, no, no, no.

>

>Tb, I realize that you can only attain 100 postings a month

>through, well, indiscriminate means.

 

Now what could this possibly have to do with the subject at hand, which you seem to think you had such an intelligent handle on?

 

But you've missed

>entirely the point of my post. Which is to say, if

>you'd slow the fuck down while sitting at your keyboard your

>intelligence and humor might actually make a contribution to

>the board, as opposed to these half-thought missives you

>launch into the realms of shallow and irrelevant

>half-humor.

 

THAT was the point of your post? - wow I'm glad you cleared that up.

 

And I doubt if my slowing down at the keyboard would help at all. Obviously my intelligence and humour is non-existent so what ain't there can't be improved upon.

 

My half-humour may be irrelevent to you honey - but I tickles the fuck out of me.

 

>Small cocks are just fine, because the bearer has no control

>over same.

 

Sounds like you have one, otherwise why would you be so defensive? And if small cocks are just fine, how come none of the escort ads I've read lately advertise that the escort is hung like a thimble?

 

>Lousy dancers

 

It was you that brought up that subject as your brand of oh so superior humour.

 

>and bad blowjobbers are also just

>fine, because they can be educated.

 

Would you know a bad blowjob if you got one?

 

>You don't have to go apeshit over small cocks, or bad

>dancing, but to deride either as inferior is absurd.

 

So it was absurd when you in an earlier post made a slam about bad dancers? You got that right!

 

>It's like saying somebody with 400 posts is superior to someone

>with 100 posts. And that, patently, is a false assumption.

 

I never said that - time to increase your meds again.

 

>(Why hell, you don't even know whether or not the St.

>Charles is still perating. I haven't lived in Toronto since

>1987 and I know the answer to that question.)

 

Now we really get to the heart of the matter. You are

claiming that your intelligence is superior to mine, simply because I don't know if a sleazy bar in Toronto is closed or not - and you do?

In the overall scheme of things, you sure know how to zero in on what's truly important in the world.

 

>Wake up. Slow down. Say something that isn't flip and

>shallow and see how much harder writing a message post

>becomes.

 

Here's a thought - never read one of my posts again. Just think how much your life will improve.

 

>You're welcome.

 

For what - You're pathetic!

 

Thunderbuns

Guest Bitchboy
Posted

Donnie was/is totally cool. Is he still around.

 

BTW, the exchange between bluenix and thunderbosoms proves the pomposity point.

Guest regulation
Posted

Bluenix, I think you're relying on a false assumption. It makes no sense to urge someone to behave in a way that lets his intelligence and humor shine through if the truth is he has neither of those qualities.

 

We have to accept that some people simply aren't capable of anything but stupid insults and jokes that were stale a decade ago. Those people, on the other hand, have to accept that the rest of us aren't going to "lighten up" and give them a free pass when they insult us just because they think we should.

 

Perhaps the problem you're having is with the correct translation of the phrase "lighten up." In English, it means: "I think it's fun to insult you, but I don't think you have any right to feel or act insulted when I do it because I'm a self-centered asshole and I don't give a shit about anyone's feelings but my own."

 

Hope that helps. :-)

Guest Thunderbuns
Posted

>Bluenix, I think you're relying on a false assumption. It

>makes no sense to urge someone to behave in a way that lets

>his intelligence and humor shine through if the truth is he

>has neither of those qualities.

>

>We have to accept that some people simply aren't capable of

>anything but stupid insults and jokes that were stale a

>decade ago. Those people, on the other hand, have to accept

>that the rest of us aren't going to "lighten up" and give

>them a free pass when they insult us just because they think

>we should.

>

>Perhaps the problem you're having is with the correct

>translation of the phrase "lighten up." In English, it

>means: "I think it's fun to insult you, but I don't think

>you have any right to feel or act insulted when I do it

>because I'm a self-centered asshole and I don't give a shit

>about anyone's feelings but my own."

>

>Hope that helps. :-)

 

And speaking of self-centered assholes........... Here we have, yet again, the expected standard reply from the one and only member of this board from whom all wisdom stems.

 

Life is soooooooo predictible.

 

Oh well, perhaps he was anointed by a priest's holy rod in puberty. That could explain his current difficulty with life.

 

Thunderbuns

Guest delhi
Posted

>Perhaps the problem you're having is with the correct

>translation of the phrase "lighten up." In English, it

>means: "I think it's fun to insult you, but I don't think

>you have any right to feel or act insulted when I do it

>because I'm a self-centered asshole and I don't give a shit

>about anyone's feelings but my own."

>

>Hope that helps. :-)

 

Thanks for the translation. I always wondered what the dolts who keep using that expression are trying to say, now I know.

 

BTW, did you see the Sixty Minutes report on terrorists using Canada as a base that was re-broadcast last weekend? I wonder if Matt watched it.

Posted

Values

 

>>If you have a serious disagrement with one of your friends -

>>I'm talking real life here, not an internet message board -

>>is that person written off for life?

>

>That may be one of the problems in real life we have a body

>of positive experiences to soften the blow when someone we

>like does something to piss us off. Here on the boards...not

>so much.

 

I am more likely than not mistaken in this and I invite those of you who have been here the longest to point out the errors of this post, but my impression is that the way to handle this situation has been done by both Rod Hagen, Rick Munroe and other escorts. They may have posted something in anger or jest and then later said they understood the reason why the post in question was inappropriate. Friends stay friends after an exchange of anger also because they learn to say they are sorry. On this board, it often seems the non-escort posters; the individuals who will not lose clients or business, do not come back here and say, I was wrong to make this "crack," my joke was inappropriate, I did not have my coffee yet, I woke up on the wrong side of the bed, et al.

 

I am as firm a believer in the right to state an opinion as I am in the right to be wrong in your beliefs. If I felt only I had the right beliefs and opinions, I would lack the ability to grow or change, much less admit that I still have things to learn. Anyone who believes that age imparts a special wisdom, that once one has been received from post secondary education that learning has ceased, is quite and sadly so mistaken.

 

The question is how we choose to communicate. While it may seem like I suggest that a post should not have teeth, that is never what I have stated. It should not merely say: you are stupid and therefore wrong or anything which is merely a personal attack for the sake of attack to the individual. But do not confuse an opinion counter to your own, particulary an opinion strongly worded or defended, as being a personal attack.

Posted

>Hope that helps. :-)

 

Indeed. He did get nasty awfully fast.

 

Perhaps he doesn't like being lectured, and in his own thread at that. Seems a bit thin-skinned, but who knows what pressures he's dealing with alone there in the dark.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...