A seperate screen for reviewing "double-ups" with escorts.

[Guest JON1265]

I have just submitted my review for a double-up I did with two escorts. The current screen is set up to only review one. I was wondering if it would be possible to create another screen for guys who are reviewing 2 escorts at once. Three-ways with escorts are not all that common but I do see them pop up - would this be possible? That way you could get all the info about each escort into the "description" area and be able to post the URL's for each escort.

 

Just a suggestion...thanks.

[+ deej]

Nice idea, but it isn't likely gonna happen any time soon.

 

You can review each guy separately and describe the 3-way (copy/paste is a wonderful thing) if you want both to get "credit" for the experience.

 

I actually asked Hoo how he wanted this handled about a year ago and he waffled on it. Both of my reviews ended up in the bit bucket, which is just as well because it seems to be one of the last encounters for one of the guys involved and the other certainly doesn't need more glowing reviews.

 

It's a tough call but as someone pointed out at the time, this is a site for reviewing *escorts* not *experiences*. I think the general concensus was that there is no general concensus. ;-)

[Guest JON1265]

>It's a tough call but as someone pointed out at the time,

>this is a site for reviewing *escorts* not *experiences*. I

>think the general concensus was that there is no general

>concensus. ;-)

 

Point taken...thanks for taking the time to respond....BUT..

 

As far as the reviewing of "escorts" and not "experiences", I'd have to disagree on that point...if you can find two escorts who work VERY well together....I think it's worth noting...sometimes 3-ways with escorts can turn in an Irwin Allen movie (and if you dont know who Irwin Allen is - keep it to yourself- I am feeling old enough).

 

But it was just an idea....

[+ deej]

>(and if you dont know who Irwin Allen is - keep

>it to yourself- I am feeling old enough).

 

Shelley Winters in Poseidon Adventure, right? I also remember Quinn-Martin productions on TV. <g> (Cannon, anyone? Mannix?)

 

Your points are noted. And you'll notice that "pairs" that routinely work together ARE reviewed as pairs. It's all in how you write the review.

 

If you got lucky with two random guys (as I did), GREAT! But that doesn't mean the 3-way will work as well with another third.

 

HooBoy is always open to suggestion (despite what some people think and LOUDLY PROCLAIM TO BE FACT). He's just always balancing suggestions against what makes sense for the whole.

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

RE: A seperate screen for reviewing

 

>You can review each guy separately and describe the 3-way

>(copy/paste is a wonderful thing) if you want both to get

>"credit" for the experience.

>

Did that myself with Brendan and Dan for Sydney.... worked just fine -- no need for a 'special' form especially considering the frequency of threeways.

 

>.... Both of my reviews ended up in the

>bit bucket, which is just as well because it seems to be one

>of the last encounters for one of the guys involved and the

>other certainly doesn't need more glowing reviews.

>

 

deej,

 

Damn!!!!!!! and I have been waiting all this time..... Your preview comments were so great that this review was on my list of Must Reads before I die. :'(

 

How about shooting me a private copy -- please??? (You didn't really trash all copies I hope -- if so get a file recovery utility on the job.)

 

Thanks, in advance, deej for allowing me to die contented -- hopefully not too soon though.

 

TY :-)

[+ deej]

RE: A seperate screen for reviewing

 

<<You didn't really trash all copies I hope -- if so get a file recovery utility on the job>>

 

Since I never kept a copy in the first place, there wasn't anything for me to trash. :o Which is a shame. It was a toe-curling experience. :9

[Guest tmbg]

RE: A seperate screen for reviewing

 

>

>It's a tough call but as someone pointed out at the time,

>this is a site for reviewing *escorts* not *experiences*. I

>think the general concensus was that there is no general

>concensus. ;-)

 

Deej I agree that a dual form is not needed. However, someone should point out to Hooboy that this site is "for reviewing *escorts* not *experiences*. "

 

I found this "Tell us about the experience REQUIRED" on the submit a review form in bold font, and 'required' is in red

 

Cheers! Ritchie

[Guest JackLA]

RE: A seperate screen for reviewing

 

Love the idea of some hot 3-ways. Anybody have some recommendations on the best escort combos they have had?