Escorts should post, of course

[Guest albinorat]

There's a long thread below. Since I am cited as a reason for the thread but didn't see it until today I will add my unimportant opinion, keeping in mind I am at least five really unpleasant posters, according to La Munroe, our Miss Cleo, she who knows all.

 

I love reading escorts and many are wonderful escort-contributors which I said in my "sick mind" post on the Deli (Miss Munroe ascribed my mild objection to his posting style to dementia).

 

The message center would be poorer without escort imput.

 

Will, as usual, summed up my opinion really well:

 

<Type #1 is the intensely personal, whining, spoiled-brat kind of post that always has to do with something that the escort in question does or does not like and resents anyone who doesn't agree. Type #2 is the knee-jerk and frequently pointless witticism whose sole purpose seems to be to turn everybody's attention to the escort-poster, not to the subject of the thread. Such posters have a way of repeating themselves until the sense of the thread is lost altogether. Type #3 [respectful snip]is the thoughtful response that draws on an escort's experiences.<

 

Will and I disagree on the value of Yenta Munroe (I'd classify him in group 2, Will puts him in group 3) but I agree with Will in general.

 

Escorts have everything to tell we clients about that world, and many are interesting people. Some are wonderful people whose good will is a tonic.

 

As to self-promotion aspect: there was Madame Munroe in that serious thread posting his asshole in the face of readers. That is not self promotion? Maybe he should give it a rest. With all the great reviews he's gotten he can afford to and has nothing to prove. Or does he? Such insistence masquerading as "humor" or "or your face fun" makes one wonder as one wanders.

 

In general there's nothing wrong with an escort using one of the "conferances" to convey his interests and experience. In the bad old days (two months ago?) there was a very cute kinky twink just my type posting amusingly and intelligently about his interests -- although actually his posts usually contained some info of general interest relevant to the topic at hand as well as an enticing small picture. Had I lived in or near Texas he'd have won me as a client in a heartbeat. He might have regretted it (put a bag over my head and turn out the lights, my cash is cute) but I wouldn't have. (A little water clenses us of the deed, but I wonder about my impact on escorts twenty years after our experience. Do some wake up in the middle of the night, in a cold sweat, screaming: 'the horror! the horror'? Do I become a "flashback"?) If that's a kind of self promotion so be it.

 

But I find Panna Munroe (as an example) posting how many pix of himself for no reason whatever in a thread with little to do with him the kind of self promotor I can live without. But then I can also skip his self promotion, as I skipped him and his partner, though we lived in the same neighborhood and I know a couple of his clients.

 

One poster wondered why clients who had a less than wonderful experience wouldn't post a review. Well, I have never posted a negative review. If I had a less than transcendant time I just shrugged it off.

 

I'd only post a bad or iffy review if the escort was a rip off in some way, dirty, vicious, or totally and utterly other than his ads represented him as being.

 

Thanks to this place I haven't had that kind of experience in a while. But thanks to this place I have had a few with guys who were popular here, nice, pros, even fun to be with, but not quite, or sort of not, or a little... you get me. No faults really, but I wish I hadn't spent the inflated price. But I could easily have been to blame (forgot to pull that bag over my head, had unreasonable expectations, some based on frothing at the mouth reviews, caught the escort on a bad night, etc).

 

But I do want to say, I (and I only post as albinorat) am merely giving an opinion, one of many posters who do. It is worth no more or less than anyone's including Dame Munroe's, evidently the hairball of earthly delight. That I find the latter obnoxious, sometimes to the extreme, and have noticed an amen (or agirl) corner for him, is worth less than his pix to most people, and has no more value than those who can write who disagree with me about anything.

 

Al

[SmallTownJohn]

Hey there,

 

You forgot "Marilyn Munroe" in all that name calling. Just want to make sure you get that extra stomp in there:0)

 

 

 

John

http://www.SmallTownJohn1.com

[Guest albinorat]

>

>You forgot "Marilyn Munroe"<

 

Well, no. "La", "Dame", "Miss", "Panna" (Polish for Princess), "Yenta" (Yiddish for "neighbor" with implication of "know it all, nosy" = 'commare'in Italian) are all titles. They are not proper names. Marilyn is a proper name. Also Marilyn Munroe would have had a first hand acqaintance with a dipilatory. But maybe Commare Munroe could supplement his earnings as a diet aid. Anybody licking that body would feel full for weeks, and be getting a lot of roughage too!

 

Al

[Guest DevonSFescort]

Al,

 

Thank you for your post, which raises some important points. You already know that I disagree with plenty of the opinions you've expressed, but I think they're heartfelt and I give you credit for speaking your mind. I have already told "Miss Munroe" that I don't believe for a minute that you are also posting as spendlove/pickwick/regulation, whose tactic of disparaging escorts (sometimes individually, sometimes as a group) from multiple handles is sleazy, pathetic, beneath contempt, and one he has been confronted and mocked about extensively in previous threads. Morally speaking you stand head and shoulders above that type of poster. You also seem to acknowledge in your "A sick mind?" thread that your comments in the "Rick Munroe's less than glowing review" thread lent themselves to the interpretation that you were making innuendos about Rick, and for that I also respect you. I also remember that on a number of occasions in the past you have taken what seemed to me like a "pro-escort" position in discussions, and for that I wholeheartedly thank you.

 

>One poster wondered why clients who had a less than

>wonderful experience wouldn't post a review. Well, I have

>never posted a negative review. If I had a less than

>transcendant time I just shrugged it off. I'd only post a bad or >iffy review if the escort was a rip

>off in some way, dirty, vicious, or totally and utterly

>other than his ads represented him as being.

 

...and yet -- "for the client who counts pennies to afford a gentleman caller, a great self propagandist with vocal allies who turns out to be a so-so sex partner can be a serious and costly disapointment" (post 26 in "Rick Munroe's less than glowing review")

That doesn't sound so easy to "just shrug off." It sounds like the kind of experience that might cause a lot of pain and frustration.

 

>Thanks to this place I haven't had that kind of experience

>in a while. But thanks to this place I have had a few with

>guys who were popular here, nice, pros, even fun to be with,

>but not quite, or sort of not, or a little... you get me. No

>faults really, but I wish I hadn't spent the inflated price.

>But I could easily have been to blame (forgot to pull that

>bag over my head, had unreasonable expectations, some based

>on frothing at the mouth reviews, caught the escort on a bad

>night, etc).

 

Why not say what you just said in a review (though I would hope you'd edit out the bit about the bag over your head)? "No faults but I wish I hadn't spent the inflated price" strikes me as an honest and fair assessment of a lukewarm experience, and it takes ownership over the client's part of of the responsibility for a date. Rick's "satisfactory" reviewer, come to think of it, did just that. He was very specific about what in the reviews (in this case, the word "versatile") had perhaps left him with an incorrect impression (that Rick would bottom on demand with no notice), and he reported accurately on what Rick undeniably did wrong (arriving late) and on what he apparently did very well (suck cock). He was honest about whether Rick lived up on the looks/promises front (yes) and about whether he would hire him again (no). Rick posted a response which prospective clients could use to gauge how he does business.

 

End of story, or it would have been, but for the contentious thread that a colleague started with Rick's name on it to reflect on the theme of whether escorts are overhyped. The unpleasantness kicked in when a poster on that thread (you) began darkly reflecting on what a disappointment "a handful" of frequently posting escorts are. (There are, of course, only a handful of escorts who do post frequently, and Rick is the most visible and probably has the most vocal allies, and the thread was about him, so it sure looked like you had him in mind.)

 

Don't get me wrong. The disappointment you're expressing is real and deserves to be ventilated. But to say that, on the one hand, the reviews (coupled, perhaps, with message center activity) are overhyping escorts, to the "serious and costly disappointment" of paying clients, and simultaneously to declare that you will not write a review unless the date was "transcendent" strikes me as taking a conflicted, if not disingenuous, position. That's my beef with you.

 

(Strictly as a matter of posting style, I would encourage you to try to cut back on the put-downs you direct at yourself in your posts. You are a human being and your opinions are not "unimportant" and your sexual needs are not to be belittled, least of all by you. Last time I checked, fat is flesh too, which means fat people can be sexy too. I have a 430+ lb. client who happens to turn me on a great deal. I think it has something to do with the fact that he seems so comfortable with who he is.)

[Guest albinorat]

Devon, thanks for your friendly response. But I'm going to win the queen of Noia award if I keep keening on. Let me see if I can be brief for a change:

 

>Al, I have already told "Miss Munroe" that I don't believe for a minute that you are also posting as spendlove/pickwick/regulation, I also remember that on a number of occasions in the past you have taken what seemed to me like a "pro-escort" positons<

 

The first time I posted here after a long haitus was to defend an escort from a vicious attack by "Pickwick" for which I earned the undying enmity of "Truthteller" who Geisha Rick defended vehemently.

 

>"No faults but I wish I hadn't spent the inflated price"

>strikes me as an honest and fair assessment of a lukewarm

>experience, and it takes ownership over the client's part of

>of the responsibility for a date. Rick's "satisfactory"

>reviewer, come to think of it, did just that.<

 

Well, Ricky Ticky Tacky's reviewer wanted the latter to bottom (he must want to part the fur as God parted the waves for Moses) and that's an issue that needed to be addressed. The main point from that review was always specify what you really want and be sure the escort agrees and comes prepared. I don't get into anything anal, or any kissing and don't require affection, so those issues (very important to many/most clients) wouldn't figure in any review I wrote.

 

I ask escorts to act; and to look a certain way. That's a very subjective realm and it is irrelevant to what many escorts do or feel they ought to be required to do. In my case I am careful not to be unfair. And what bothered me may be totally irrelevant to anyone else. I accept that I am gambling to some degree.

 

>whether escorts are overhyped<

 

I have friends who hire a lot and all have tried the "hyped escorts". One said to me recently, "well, he had a five inch dick, max, was too breezy, looked a lot older than 27, didn't cuddle, didn't come and ran out the door in 59 minutes and 50 seconds."

 

But I asked did he deliver in a basic way? "Oh yes, great mouth, hard dick, clever anal play, I came."

 

So what's the complaint? My friend should have said to the escort in advance, "I really do want someone who is or really looks 25 tops, will come, kisses long and hard, and who will cuddle some after we both come." Only if the escort had agreed to all that then reneged on some of it would a so-so review have been justified in my opinion. Someone else might have found that a great experience or at least a good typical one, and you can't blame the escort for not being a mind reader.

 

>But to say that, on the one hand, the reviews (coupled, perhaps, with message center activity) are over-hyping escorts, to the "serious and costly disappointment" of paying clients, and simultaneously to declare that you will not write a review unless the date was "transcendent" strikes me as taking a conflicted, if not

>disingenuous, position. That's my beef with you. <

 

You’re entitled. But like many people into “scenes” I need an escort to get into the scene, and that is more important to me usually than whether he’s a sexual dynamo. I love to tie up a nasty acting “straight” “boy” and blow him until he’s moaning in joy. (That’s why Sean of the lamented Sean and Casey was my beau ideal). I also like some oral back. That’s it.

 

There are escorts who just don’t get it – though even at my size they’d happily fuck me 70 ways to China, or vice versa. Who have ten inches really and get real hard. Who kiss like Simone Signoret on acid.

 

There are escorts who try and can’t carry it off. There are escorts who are nice but we don’t click. I’m a chatty Kathy, some escorts can’t stand that and get impatient (Sean was a charmer and fun to talk to). How could I in conscience put down an escort who made the call back but who I shouldn’t have cast? Unless he was very late, dirty, nasty, or seriously not what he represented himself as being I have no case.

 

My friend above has a borderline case, but his attitude was “why bother?”

 

>(try to cut back on the put-downs you direct at

>yourself -- fat is flesh too, which means fat people can be sexy too.<

 

You must be great as an escort. I respect escorts who are clear about what turns them off. Good escorts need to find a way into the scene too, even if in the real world they wouldn’t be attracted to many of their clients. Nobody wants to pay to feel put down or uncomfortable (unless that’s part of the playacting. I love to enact Jabba and Luke where “Luke” mouths off about my hideousness while I bind him. So call me sick but call me!).

 

Thanks again.

 

Al

[Guest Thunderbuns]

Al:

 

Enough already! We all know by now that your love affair with Rick Munroe is tenuous, at best. Further amplification of this will serve no real purpose and put us all to sleep.

 

You obviously have serious self esteem issues as evidenced by the nick name you have chosen for yourself and the constant references to the "bag over the head" as well as telling us on several occasions that you consider yourself to be unattractive.

 

As long as you perceive yourself this way others will too. Many less than stunning men manage to win their way into other's hearts by showing a beauty that lies beneath the skin that nature has provided them with. Carl Malden & Walter Matheau could not be considered as beauties but it never stopped them from being well liked by thousands of people. Try to acquire a more positive demeanor and you will surprise yourself with the results. I'd even bet that Rick's self promotion wouldn't bother you nearly as much then. Gibe it a try - you don't have anything to loose!

 

Thunderbuns

[Guest albinorat]

Thunderbuns please read more carefully. Devon wrote a very long post and it would have been rude to ignore it. I answered quickly as I could. Yes, most of it was a re-tread. Sorry. So just skip it. Three things: I wasn't thrilled to see myself put down by a non member/poster at this site in Devon's diary. Most of us post in a given context, that of our personas and other postings. Secondly, I don't need counseling. I look the way I look, and I accepted it a long time ago. At my age in fact it wouldn't matter how I looked in a typical gay scene. Maybe you fantasize about Walter Matthau but I can assure you NONE of the Chelsea Bois or their equivalents do. I make fun of myself and I understand that between my scene and my looks a healthy percent of escorts aren't going to go for it. But I do well enough, believe me. Finally, I don't believe with Devon's contributer that most clients here "want escorts in their place". I am very greatful to the escorts who have given me a good time and there are many who are lots of fun to read. I see no value in demeaning escorts because finally that makes it a demeaning experience for the client. I may have a weird scene by some standards but I don't demean myself or my play pal. And yes, indeed, enough of me, more than enough.

 

Al

[Guest regulation]

>The first time I posted here after a long haitus was to

>defend an escort from a vicious attack by "Pickwick" for

>which I earned the undying enmity of "Truthteller" who

>Geisha Rick defended vehemently.

 

 

I have a few minutes to kill, so I'll use them to correct the record here. The first half of your statement is false. The thread you are referring to was started by Lucky for the purpose of calling Rod Hagen an asshole, drug user and several other names. Pick's only contribution was to ask Rod, who had responded in the thread, why someone with his impressive education had decided to be an escort. That doesn't qualify as a "vicious attack" in the lexicon of anyone who understands English. In other words, you were yelling at him for something that someone else had said. The second half of your statement is correct. As a result of your post, TT let loose on you in a way he has done to few others. Most amusing.

 

 

Like your contemptuous friend Devon you've gratuitously insulted me on several occasions. That is your nature. But if I give you your due, I must say that anyone who accuses you of trying to discourage Rick or any other escort from participating here, as Devon implied you were doing in the "Backlash" thread, is quite wrong. I believe your post in that thread inspired by Lucky in which you stated that you have found the escorts you know to possess far more intelligence and other good qualities than most of the other people in your life was quite sincere. Weird, but sincere. To suggest, as another poster did, that you resent escorts and want to keep them "in their place" does not jibe with the sentiments you have expressed here in the past.

 

The truth is that neither you nor any other poster I can find has stated in recent weeks that he would prefer escorts stop or curtail posting here. Which leads me to wonder what this fuss by Devon is really all about. There are some escorts, Ethan and one or two others, who have made a game of threatening to leave the message board forever from time to time. The purpose of this game seems to be to get other posters to say nice things about them and beg them to stay. I suppose Devon's posts are the latest version of this game. Very creative.

[Will]

"Who kiss like Simone Signoret on acid."

 

Yes! YES! YES!!!

 

Al, I am so glad you're back. PLEASE STAY THIS TIME!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Love

Will

[Guest Bitchboy]

>To suggest, as another poster did, that you resent escorts

>and want to keep them "in their place" does not jibe with

>the sentiments you have expressed here in the past.

 

Hmm I assume this is me (if incorrect, I apologize) and, of course, anyone who cares to read my post could see that I am not talking about Albinorat at all. I have always been fond of him and his posts. I do, however, disagree with him on this Rick Munroe thing. Granted,I don't spend all that much time here and come and go for long periods. However, I had someone like regulation more in mind when I made my statement. Not him in particular at the time I made the post, but now that he has brought it into play, I seem to recall at almost anytime I have popped into the message center, he is usually berating some popular escort, just as Devon seems to be getting it now. I don't think this behavior is limited to him, but I also don't think you need any kind of special training to see resentment in most everything he says.

 

I would say that I feel quite a few of the clients who post here want escorts to be like their children - seen but not heard. Some "thing" to be shuffled out for company to sing their little song, and then banished to the kiddies table during dinner. But definitely not Albinorat - I remember fondly his musings about Sean. The musings of a very kind person.

[Guest DevonSFescort]

>The truth is that neither you nor any other poster I can

>find has stated in recent weeks that he would prefer escorts

>stop or curtail posting here.

 

And yet clients are warning their favorite escorts to stay off the message boards. That fact says a lot more than any statement by a poster.

 

>There are some

>escorts, Ethan and one or two others, who have made a game

>of threatening to leave the message board forever from time

>to time. The purpose of this game seems to be to get other

>posters to say nice things about them and beg them to stay.

>I suppose Devon's posts are the latest version of this game.

> Very creative.

 

To "suppose" any such thing, of course, you have to be willing to violate your own pet peeve against putting words in other people's mouths, since I haven't made any such threats and am not playing any games. I was seeking feedback and conversation, and I got just that, along with a few compliments and some criticism, which I responded to. I have a posting history on this board. Anyone familiar with it isn't going to give much weight to what you're "supposing."

[phage]

>Granted,I don't spend all that much

>time here and come and go for long periods. However, I had

>someone like regulation more in mind when I made my

>statement. Not him in particular at the time I made the

>post, but now that he has brought it into play, I seem to

>recall at almost anytime I have popped into the message

>center, he is usually berating some popular escort, just as

>Devon seems to be getting it now. I don't think this

>behavior is limited to him, but I also don't think you need

>any kind of special training to see resentment in most

>everything he says.

 

It’s interesting (but hardly surprising) how everyone reads the same words and draws such different conclusions. I’ve never noticed any of this in regulation’s posts. He sometimes asks very pointed and blunt questions, and if the subject interests him, he will dissect a post sentence-by-sentence. He obviously does not suffer fools gladly and isn’t shy about letting you know that he thinks you are the ‘fool de jour’. However, it’s all done in a decidedly analytical and dispassionate manner.

 

I have honestly never “seen” resentment. My sense is that he couldn’t be bothered enough to be resentful and that’s what really gets to some people. Someone being dismissive is much more irritating than resentful. At least you know you are getting to them if they care enough to resent you.

 

Although reg hardly needs defending, I suppose this will add me to his cadre of multiple personalities. (I know you didn't say this Bitchboy, but I don’t want to do a separate post.) I find that whole tactic of accusing someone of posting under different handles more than a little absurd. Since you can never know for sure, no matter how deep your suspicions, why bring it up? It just takes focus off your argument and makes you look desperate.

 

Is it so hard to believe that there are several posters who have similar points of view and an affinity for one another? That one would speak up when he feels the other is wronged? Sort of like the way Devon spoke up when he felt his buddy Rick was being slighted.

[Guest Smoothee]

You say you see "no value in demeaning escorts" and yet you can't stop picking on and mocking Rick Munroe, someone whom you say you've never even met.

[Guest DevonSFescort]

>Although reg hardly needs defending, I suppose this will add

>me to his cadre of multiple personalities.

 

Not in my book, phage. I always think you make good points, some of which I disagree with, and you always do so respectfully and without sneering and splitting hairs.

 

>I find that whole tactic of accusing someone of

>posting under different handles more than a little absurd.

 

So do I. It's unfortunate that people have used that tactic so willy-nilly in the past, including against regulation & co., attempting to link him to posters like TruthTeller and albinorat, both of whom have clashed with regulation and/or spendlove and/or pickwick.

 

>Since you can never know for sure, no matter how deep your

>suspicions, why bring it up? It just takes focus off your

>argument and makes you look desperate.

 

In general, you are right, but there are cases where exposure is not only the right thing to do but absolutely relevant to the argument at hand. Sounds like we disagree over whether this was one of those cases, but my honest feeling is that it was, and that was my motivation in bringing it up. I have been very selective about who I made this accusation about, and even about the context in which I made it. I didn't pile up on pickwick et al when he was exposed in the rimming thread because, frankly, I didn't care whether he used multiple identities to defend a position on hepatitis c that was, to my mind, effectively refuted. I have also stepped in and identified posters who I felt were being unfairly smeared by being lumped in with regulation's multiple identities. I think you'll agree I am not a casual user of this "tactic."

 

>Is it so hard to believe that there are several posters who

>have similar points of view and an affinity for one another?

> That one would speak up when he feels the other is wronged?

 

It is the easiest thing in the world to believe. My charge is that that is not the case in this situation. At any rate, time will tell whether I am right or not. People will either see the tactics I've described in action, or not. It would be great to see regulation post in a manner consistent with your description.

[Guest Thunderbuns]

So just skip it. Three things: I wasn't thrilled to

>see myself put down by a non member/poster at this site in

>Devon's diary.

 

You actualy READ that diary?

 

>Secondly, I don't need counseling.

 

I think you're confusing the word "need" with "want"

 

 

>Maybe you fantasize about Walter Matthau but I can assure you NONE >of the Chelsea Bois or their equivalents do.

 

I don't "fantasize" about Matthau. I merely used him as an example of an unattractive man who did rather well for himself in this world in spite of his less than conventional appeaarance.

 

 

>I may have a weird scene by some standards but I don't demean myself >or my play pal.

 

There's nothing wrong with a "weird scene" Most guys have a bit of desire for "wierd" in their sexual makeup. Unfortunally, many of them don't have the confidence to explore it and thereby lose out on a lot of good times.

 

Thunderbuns

[+ Lucky]

Hey, Thunderbuns, are yoou gonna tell us what weird scene you long for?:9

[+ Lucky]

Regulation, i don't think anybody is going to beg YOU to stay. BTW, someone called ME a drug user, not the other way around. He backed off when I asked him to prove it.

[bluenix]

>Regulation, i don't think anybody is going to beg YOU to

>stay.

 

I'm not really into begging, at least in this context, but I LIKE reading regulation's posts. One man's predictable is another man's reliable, I guess.

 

What fun to see an argument here here finally. God, all those good manners were starting to get me down.

[Guest Bitchboy]

Yes, it is interesting how we all "feel" things differently. I do agree about the analytical nature of regulations posts, however. I've never thought he was TT, not even once. TT had a wideness of thought and scope that regulation has never expressed. It's sort of like the difference between a university graduate and a community college freshman.

[Guest regulation]

>And yet clients are warning their favorite escorts to stay

>off the message boards. That fact says a lot more than any

>statement by a poster.

 

You continued inability to point to any recent post that justifies the accusations you've been making says it all, in my view.

 

>To "suppose" any such thing, of course, you have to be

>willing to violate your own pet peeve against putting words

>in other people's mouths, since I haven't made any such

>threats and am not playing any games.

 

Then what exactly is the meaning of your musings on what this board would be like if you and other escorts stop posting here in reaction to what you claim is hostility to you? In light of the fact that you can't produce any concrete examples of such hostility, what could be the motive for saying such a thing? I think it's pretty clear.

 

 

>I was seeking

>feedback and conversation, and I got just that, along with a

>few compliments and some criticism, which I responded to. I

>have a posting history on this board. Anyone familiar with

>it isn't going to give much weight to what you're

>"supposing."

 

Anyone who reads your post in which you mock people who participate here "for the sheer love of posting on the message board" and state that you "make no bones" about the fact that you post here to promote your business will have to conclude that that is the motive for every word you write. No supposition is necessary. One merely has to take you at your word.

[Guest regulation]

>Regulation, i don't think anybody is going to beg YOU to

>stay.

 

And I care about this because . . . ?

 

> BTW, someone called ME a drug user, not the other way

>around. He backed off when I asked him to prove it.

 

You are not telling the truth. You started a thread in which you called Rod an asshole and drug user in your very first post. Please don't deny it again. If you do I'll have to go through the tedious process of copying and reproducing your post here.

[+ Lucky]

Well,reg honey, you are just going to have to dig through that musty pile because the facts are that a)I did call him an asshole, because that's how he described himself! b) he accused me of using illegal drugs, I challenged him to prove it, he backed off. So your challenge after you finish your morning granola and prunes is to find the exact post that backs up what you say.

And, if you can prove it, I will eat prunes!

[Guest regulation]

>I seem to

>recall at almost anytime I have popped into the message

>center, he is usually berating some popular escort, just as

>Devon seems to be getting it now.

 

"Getting it"? Show me a post in which I say, either literally or in words to that effect, that Devon is bad person or a bad escort. Or if you want to buy into his obssession with my fabled "multiple identities," show me a post by ANY of those "identities" to that effect. You can't, because there are no such posts.

 

The worst thing I have accused him of in this and related discussions is that he uses this board to call attention to himself. Which is exactly what he himself said in the thread he started. If he thinks that is a bad thing to do, I suppose he should stop doing it. If he doesn't think it's a bad thing to do, he has no reason to complain if I or anyone else says he's doing it. And you have no reason to complain on his behalf.

 

> I don't think this

>behavior is limited to him, but I also don't think you need

>any kind of special training to see resentment in most

>everything he says.

 

Phage is quite right, as he usually is. To be resentful, one first needs to care. I don't. There's nothing at stake here for me. Perhaps, as he suggests, that is what really bothers you and Devon.

[Guest Thunderbuns]

>Hey, Thunderbuns, are yoou gonna tell us what weird scene

>you long for?:9

 

Lucky - I thought you'd never ask (blush)

 

Thunderbuns

[Justice]

Al is right, escorts have as much right as anyone to post here. I value most of their opinions and it's a lot of fun to get to know tem outside of their reviews and thier ads. I hate to sound like a broken record, but everyone -- both escort and non-escort -- who vists this Board (or any other site on the 'net for that matter) abide by the following rules:

 

Rule Number 1: Read only those posts by people whose posts don't annoy me.

 

Rule Number 2: When in doubt, refer to Rule Number 1.

 

My visits to this site became much more enjoyable once I started to live by the above rules.