Nikita in London (Again)

[Guest cmp]

Nikita's first review is finally up (under today's Newest Reviews). Unfortunately, it's a negative one. If the author of the review gets to read this: please write Mark and Paul about this incident. Doing so, you will do a big favor to both SuitedAndBooted and their clients, as the boy seems to have great potential. Who knows, they might even make it up for you in some way. If the service you get is that bad, you *have* to complain, especially seeing that their rates are really steep. The address is info@suitedandbooted.com .

 

Two small comments about the review: Nikita has three pictures on the SuitedAndBooted Website (you should attach one to the review), and according to the two managers of the agency, the boy is exclusively a bottom, not versatile (he is 'passive' in the British vernacular) and effeminate (Mark and Paul always warn the clients about that). I have never met Nikita in person, but had an exchange of e-mail messages about him with Mark and Paul who are both very nice and professional. (I met another one of their boys.) I was looking forward to see Nikita's first review here, I was hoping it would be a positive one.

 

By the way, has anyone seen the new Malay hottie on that site? I forgot his name, but you can't miss him. What do you think of him? And what do you think about those hotties at Choirboyz, even if Mike is not there now? Matt, would you check out some hot boys for us while you are in London?

[Guest cmp]

An afterthought: Mark and Paul should make it clear to Nikita that he is not allowed to drink on the job anything that cums out of a bottle instead of a pair of juicy balls.

[Guest Londonguy]

What do SuiteandBooted charge ? And do they do in-calls like Choirboyz do ? Thanks.

[Guest cmp]

They are more expensive than Choirboyz. If I remember correctly, their rate is 150GBP for one hour, 280GBP for two hours. They don't have a place for incalls, but according to their (very nicely done) Web site, a few of the boys may do incalls in their private places. Please share your experience with us old voyeurs

[Guest BareBoy]

Wow! - unbelievable rates! How come these guys can charge these sums when Villa Gianni charge on ly £70 for in-calls and not much more for out-calls, and on the evidence of their site have boys a great deal more attractive?

[fedssocr1]

Yeah, unbelieveable for sure. I'd say the going rate in London has got to be a good bit less than that. But my only recent experience there was at Villa Gianni.

 

I met a boy in Manchester who was even cheaper, about 60 an hour with penetration, otherwise he would have only been 50. And he was very young, cute and sweet.

 

I can't see how anyone would get away with charging 150/hr in that market. Although that's only about US$210, so it's comparable to NYC prices.

[Guest cmp]

I think escort agencies always charge much more than "health massage parlors".

[Guest Londonguy]

Regarding rates, I've been with say a dozen escorts in London over the past year. My favourite (who I've seen maybe 6 times) charges £90 - in call - for pretty much whatever you want (he's a lovely guy). Choirboyz now charge £130, but it is an agency, they do offer 'checked' guys and a place to accommodate. Other escorts (direct) have charged £70-£100 (my second fave charges £80). Hope this helps - in general I've found the level of satisfaction isn't related to the charge. Suggest people are very selective about paying high charges unless you're confident (by reference, presumably) about the outcome.

[Guest cmp]

Thanks for the wise advice.

[CT Dick]

Manchester?

 

>I met a boy in Manchester who was even cheaper, about

>60 an hour with penetration, otherwise he would have only

>been 50. And he was very young, cute and sweet.

 

I'm going to Manchester soon. Pray how did you find this younster? Is he regularly available or just a chance find?

Any other Mancunian advice?

 

Dick