escort-scout

[Guest squaddie]

Saw an advert on http://www.independent-escorts.com/london-scout.htm.

More than keen on an appointment with him.

Anyone had experience of this guy? Would appreciate any info.

[Guest SeaGuy]

I've also been blown away by this escort's picture on the same site-independent escorts- and am very keen on a visit to London . I was also very impressed by Jack. He and Scout are absolute dreams. If you have experience with either one please advise.

[Michael]

Somehow I can't see myself spending money on someone who uses such an obviously and badly faked picture to advertise with.

[Guest SeaGuy]

Michael,

You must know something I don't. Pic seems as legitimate as any. Why are you so sure its fake?

[Michael]

Well, first of all it just doesn't "look right" ...

 

Download a copy of the picture and zoom in on it using your favorite image editor.

 

Look at the apparent width of the guy's dick just as it leaves his hand and note the (completely unnatural) way that it suddenly gets much thicker. I have no doubt that it has been morphed up in size by at least 25%, possibly a bit more.

 

It's a pity really because the model in the picture (who, of course, may or may not actually be the escort) certainly seems to have a very nice big dick - it just isn't nearly as big as the picture attempts to make it appear.

[Guest Daddy-In-Training]

Sorry Michael,

 

I believe that I'll have to disagree with you in this particular case. After close examination of the picture in question, I believe that it's simply a very well done, professional level photo shoot.

 

Here's my reasoning:

 

1) According to bio info with the photo, model is 6' and 165 pounds, which indicates that he is of a slender build (i.e. a waist size of ~32 inches). Apparent size of member in question is ~25% or 8-9".

 

2) Apparent thickness is on the order of 2-3" diameter, which lines up with bio information saying "Thick". Not out of the question, I've meet several men of this dimension (expecially those who use pumps).

 

3) Lighting is of a professional level, consistant and well defined across the entire photograph. Attempts to "Magnify" the area would show destintive banding that is not there. Shadows and highlights are where you'd expect them to be.

 

4) General condition of the skin, matchs up with a older man (i.e. matches the bio age of 30) that works out a lot and had "pumped up" for the photo session. The pumped up nipples are another give away that these were pro's at work.

 

5) If you examine the areas around the hand, and the upper thigh area, I think you'll find that what your seeing is the model holding one of his balls and the dick in such a way as they appear as one mass. Again, completely legit and often done in the industry.

 

If this photo is a fake, it's a VERY well done fake. One that in my estimation would have required several hours of work from an expert and would have been very expensive.

 

-- Daddy

[Guest travisnyc]

Daddy- I stand in awe of your deductive reasoning. Quite impressive. You have graduated from "in training".

[Michael]

Hmmm - I 'm still doubtful, but I would be happy to be proven wrong on this one.

 

Perhaps HooBoy could investigate for us during his sojourn under London Bridge ...

[Guest travisnyc]

If it's as good as it looks, he may never return to the states.

[Guest leigh]

sorry guys but it's all real!!

been there, had it,sucked it and got fucked by it.

wow!!!!

this is one happy camper that will be back for more.

[Guest MrB]

Won't you please write a review and post it?

[Guest Rickx]

How does his face look??

[Guest MrB]

LAST EDITED ON Oct-20-00 AT 03:08AM (EST)[p]sorry

[Guest leigh]

Sorry

Scout has a fantastic body! and what a dick WOW! but the face well it's ok kind of old looking! Sorry guys! Sorry Scout!

[Guest george]

I know this is an old topic but I just discovered it. I wanted some feedback from Leigh or anyone else who has been with Scout, since I was considering seeing him my next trip to London.

 

Details please.

 

Thank you.