WHO wins the OVER-RATED AWARDS 2008 and WHY?

[Okliehomo]

You know, while I think the idea behind this thread is interesting and I could certainly contribute a name or two ... or 20..... and while it is probably, actually the real point of this Forum.... that is, we as clients discussing escorts... our experiences... who's hot, who's not... who seals the deal, who is overrated.... in an open and honest fashion... It's what led me to this place to begin with and the reason why I can't seem to look away.. (much like passing a car wreck... at least, for the last few weeks....)

 

But... there is no NICE way to say that they are over rated.... And you guys know that we don't always tell the complete truth to each other about them.... (well, not publicly, anyway...) because if we do, some of them come firing back and we are old and pathetic and have to pay for sex and we are fat and dirty and have bad breath... because if we do, some of their supporters who apparently keep the faith, no matter what and have none of the aforementioned flaws, then lash out at us, too... either them or one of the maligned escort's alters.... correct our grammar, spelling, word choice, etc... or just call us names.

 

Have never wanted any part of that part of this Board, so... so far, I have always played..... nice.... for the most part.

 

A slightly drunken sidebar;

 

(While I am confessing, Father, to not telling the whole truth about my disappointments.. I want to also confess that the ones I have raved about deserved it... these boys have given me the best sex of my life.... (and I had great sex with the last Bf)... Jim Slade, Marco Feretti, Jason Branch, Kent Larson, Ty, Juan and Kevin, Bill, Marco Rochelle, Carreras, Alencar, Beau Adams... and Andrew Justice, the real REAL deal... and without a doubt, the true one.... the best sex ever..... David.....)

 

Back on point, sort of....

 

So... my real issue with this thread is that there is "NO LET"S BE NICE (for a change)" way to post about how OVER RATED an escort is... no matter, if he is a regular here or not...

 

Honesty isn't always an option when you are effecting people's livelihoods. Is it?

 

Or is that affecting??? Here it comes.....

 

Okie

[Bart]

I would have to agree with Okie, that is exactly the same approach I would take. I have over time commented negatively about a couple of escorts in a thread but more likely I would comment privately to the poster because I feel my negative statement may be viewed as a general opinion regarding an escort as opposed to something that was specific to me.

 

I can think of one guy immediately who fits the my definition of this thread. A guy for whom after you parted you said yourself, "Damn is it me or was that meeting disappointing and should have been so much more" Now in it by itself was not a rip off or terrible but for lack of a better word disappointing and yet I feel if I do mention it was my own experience and I have usually felt maybe it was me or lack of connection plus my experience occurred in 2005 so little relevance to today. I would say no over rated issues in 2008 for me.

[JT Brooklyn]

Bart..I also feel the same way as you and Okie on the subject. ;-)

 

I have in the past commented on a very Lack Luster Time with a much mentioned and Self Promo Working Guy. But in my case it was substantiated by others in the Thread and emails, when I was still email ACCESSIBLE! LOL BUT would I bother again other than maybe a Review NO!

 

Although IF the guy has "Existing RECENT Reviews" which I feel were MY Experience.. I donot bother adding to the Pile anymore. I still think after a while there's such a thing as Over Kill.. ;-)

 

Maybe some day I will "DO A NEWBIE" as a TOTAL change of pace! ;-)