Why bother?

[Bob]

The three reviews of today tell little or nothing so don't waste your time reading. The first two want to keep the details private. Don't you just love that? The review of JAK keeps referring to his wonderful web site but never gives a link. Since the reviewer mostly wanted to admire his beautiful body and not much else it would have been nice to be able to see the body.

[Guest scortlovr]

I agree. Defeats the purpose of this site. Considering how long it takes for a review to be published, I think reviews which basically say nothing specific, should simply not be published so that more substantial ones can appear faster. Imagine a theatre critic writing a review of a play and all he says is how wonderful it was without saying one word about the play itself, the production, the performers or anything.

 

However, I couldn't stop laughing reading the review from the London escort (already forgot the name) poor kid's got 2 reviews: the recent one which is glowing without even giving a hint as to why and the second one which is really, really bad. Go figure!

[buckguy]

Write reviews and write better ones.

[JT Brooklyn]

Bob..Totally Agree. The "between us" calls for No Review?

 

So why bother other than to show the Guy is Available. IMHO

 

For quite awhile now I just Look to see WHO was Reviewed..BUT Rarely bother reading them.

 

And with the "Over The Top Amount" of Reviews on SOME of these Guys...Fageddaboutit! It's like reading the "Specs" on an Old Model Car! ;-)

[ariadne1880]

I'm sorry my review didn't go into the specifics so that some of the creepier people could live vicariously through my experience. Why not stop complaining and write a review -- in great detail -- of all of your escort experiences?

 

My review got across what it was supposed to: that I had a great time, that the escort was well worth the money and time, and that I would highly recommend him. If you want to know more, hire him yourself and find out.

 

I don't find the sharing of intimate sexual details to be appropriate on public website and it is something that I would never do. If you don't like that, frankly, go bugger yourself.

 

Mark

[Guest josephga]

I agree mark that its not appropriate to go into very intimate details. people will read into it and expect the excact same thing if they book.. take an escort he might do things with a really hot client that he would never do with the average guy..

[Epigonos]

Whenever I read a review that includes a sentence like the: “I will leave the specific details of our time together between us” I turn off and go to the next one. With that stated I also believe that the author, of the review, certainly has a right to make such a statement. Simply because that type of review is of no use to me does NOT necessarily mean that it will be of no use to others.

 

Personally I found no problem with the JAK review. It informed me that JAK likes many of the same things I do. He likes to kiss, he likes his body played with and he enjoys his cock being sucked – all that sounds good to me. Since JAK is versatile I will assume he is willing to such my cock as well. If all of these things are true HE IS MY KIND OF ESCORT. Thus based upon this review I will likely hire the guy in the future.

 

P.S. And yes I DO write reviews and yes they are quite explicit

[Bart]

I am one that loves to read the juicy details. I also give lots of stuff during my reviews as I like to write porn type stuff.

 

That said I appreciate that all the reviewers took the time to send in a review. I know some people are just not comfortable writing juicy details. Meetings with escorts for them is a very personal situation. At least we got from the review that the guy is not a scam, he is clean, does return phone calls and emails, showed up on time and got an idea of the fee. The reveiwers seem well satisfied.

 

Those are the basics I want to get out of any review.

 

Now I have heard equal complaints on the other side when reviewers wax on with all details and readers want the basics.

 

So again thank you all reviewers. At least if I am interested in an escort there will be something here to begin with and that is all I can ask for.

[Guest zipperzone]

>The three reviews of today tell little or nothing so don't

>waste your time reading. The first two want to keep the

>details private. Don't you just love that? The review of JAK

>keeps referring to his wonderful web site but never gives a

>link. Since the reviewer mostly wanted to admire his

>beautiful body and not much else it would have been nice to be

>able to see the body.

 

Would you buy this book"

 

The Open Kimono, by I. C. Hairs

 

This was a wonderful book that I can heartly reccomend to anyone who can read. It is bound in a really nice shade of green cloth and the gilt lettering of the title really stand out.

 

It arrived promptly in my mail slot, exactly at the time the ad said it would and the pages were of good stock and set in an easy to read type face. My policy is to not reveal the contents of the book because that is something better kept between the author, Random House and myself. But you can take my word for it that it is a great book and I probably will read it again.

[ariadne1880]

I relayed the essence of my experience which is what I think is most important in reviews of this nature. And you're exactly right. Some escorts will do some things with some clients, but not with others. That's another reason I am very reluctant to go into those kinds of details.

 

It's also why I don't often like to discuss what I paid because sometimes an escort you've known awhile or one just likes you will charge you a different rate than for others.

 

I realize that some here don't have much more than a grade school education and will be unable to understand that, but that's not really my problem.

 

People looking for specific sexual details are the same kinds of people who never leave their computers, order pizza online, while they pee into their styrofoam cups never leaving their ergonomic chairs in their dingy basements.

 

Mark

[ariadne1880]

Of course, the comparison of a book and an escort experience is totally false on its face. I realize you won't get that. Not all analogies work. This one is completely specious.

 

Mark

[whipped guy]

While this analogy works for me... and works quite well, I must admit that reviews and books can be written in different styles and using diverse techniques to get across a given point of view. Sometimes one must delve deeper and read a bit more in between the lines in order to get the true meaning of what a given author is endeavoring to convey.

 

Still in a forum such as this a more straight forward, and more informative approach is usually better. After all, it is for the dissemination of information that this site exists… and the more informative a review the better. That said, I think I was able to read between the lines in at least the third review so as to get at least a general feel for the escort’s manner and performance.

[+ Oliver]

I wanted to see JAK also. :9

So try these:

http://www.rentboy.com/JAK

http://www.jakattack.com/

 

And Mark (ariadne1880), if posters don't agree with what you have to say, I don't see the need or propriety of casting aspersions on their education (or your perceived lack thereof), life style, or understanding. I will agree with what you had to say about Dirk, as far as you went with your description – having seen him for an evening just over two weeks ago. He’s gorgeous and “big”! :9

[Epigonos]

BRAVO Oliver!!!!! Well done!!!!!

[Philly Guy]

>I'm sorry my review didn't go into the specifics so that some

>of the creepier people could live vicariously through my

>experience.

 

No one wants to live vicariously through your experience; we only want to know what the escort is willing to do and whether he is worth hiring.

 

Why not stop complaining and write a review -- in

>great detail -- of all of your escort experiences?

 

Many of us do write reviews and make sure we provide information to the other's that provide the same.

>

>My review got across what it was supposed to: that I had a

>great time, that the escort was well worth the money and time,

>and that I would highly recommend him. If you want to know

>more, hire him yourself and find out.

 

It is not that cut and dry. If you are not willing to provide information then the review is worthless. If, as you suggest, "if we want to know more we should hire the escort" proves that you admit the review is worthless.

>

>I don't find the sharing of intimate sexual details to be

>appropriate on public website and it is something that I

>would never do. If you don't like that, frankly, go bugger

>yourself.

 

Mark - I have a better idea. Since you feel the readers of this site are creepy; why don't you not write any more reviews. You are an ASSHOLE

 

 

>

>Mark

[whipped guy]

Actually I think that one of the most important parts of a review is the section given the least attention by most writers … That is the YOU section at the end.

 

Given that the author of the review divulges a sufficient amount of details, the YOU section can then put those details into the proper perspective. In other words, the YOU section should reveal more than just a person’s age, but also their likes, dislikes, desires, and needs. Even if the reviewer chooses not to reveal too much of what transpired, given an informative YOU section, many readers might be able to read between the lines to help them make an evaluation regarding the suitability of hiring a given individual.

[Philly Guy]

>Actually I think that one of the most important parts of a

>review is the section given the least attention by most

>writers … That is the YOU section at the end.

>

>Given that the author of the review divulges a sufficient

>amount of details, the YOU section can then put those details

>into the proper perspective. In other words, the YOU section

>should reveal more than just a person’s age, but also their

>likes, dislikes, desires, and needs. Even if the reviewer

>chooses not to reveal too much of what transpired, given an

>informative YOU section, many readers might be able to read

>between the lines to help them make an evaluation regarding

>the suitability of hiring a given individual.

>

 

Thanks Whipped - You are 100% right. That would help and I will pay attention to that next time I review. But, or course, someone that does not like to divulge what was done during the session is likly not to want to provide that information either

[ariadne1880]

I did provide the information; I didn't provide the information you wanted. Those are two different things.

 

And like most people whose brain is clearly in their ass, phillyguy, I never said the people on this site were creepy. I said people who want each and every sexual detail were creepy. I realize with your IQ of 28 you don't get the distinction.

 

If you want to know what the escort does or doesn't do; ask him. I gave all the information that anyone with half a brain or more could possibly want to make the decision to hire him. I realize that leaves you out.

 

And most people -- hint, hint -- without a cogent argument fall back on name-calling (asshole). It's so nice you remember kindergarten so well. Or are you still there?

 

Mark

[ariadne1880]

If a poster, in trying to make an argument, resorts to calling me names and cannot really understand the English language as written in that review then I am certainly going to wonder about the level of their education or whether or not they are just plain stupid.

 

My review was straightforward and speaks for itself. It includes everything one could want to know about whether my experience with Dirk was a good one or a bad one. The only thing it doesn't include is specific and graphic sexual details. The only thing one can conclude from that is that these people who are saying my review was "worthless" -- and what a judgment that is -- could care less about hiring him but only care about wallowing in the specific sexual experiences of the people writing.

 

I am sorry but that is SICK.

 

Mark

[Guest zipperzone]

>Of course, the comparison of a book and an escort experience

>is totally false on its face. I realize you won't get that.

>Not all analogies work. This one is completely specious.

>

>Mark

 

Mark - Speaking of things that people "don't get", it was you that didn't get that I was trying to be humorous by writing what I clearly knew was a ridulous comparison.

 

I have really tried very hard to like you, but you make it an uphill battle. You tell us you are divorced - is it any fucking wonder?

You seem to delight in basking in your superior attitude casting aspersions on anyone who does not measure up to you impossibly high standards.

 

I'm afraid I have to agree with Philly Guy who called you an ASSHOLE.

 

And I know you will probably tell me that you don't care what I think, but then again, I don't care that you don't care.

 

Have a great weekend!

[Philly Guy]

Thanks Zipper - Personally I feel Mark adds nothing to this forum and would rather see his reviews and comments gone.

 

He may be a Mensa (at least in his own mind) but he sure does not know how to write an informative review. I am sure sex with him is as boring as his reviews.

 

I would rather have him say that when he does an overnight he wraps himself in Saran Wrap so he won't catch an STD, or that he has his escort put a Gerbil in his ass, at least I will get a better picture of what happened in the bedroom. That way I could truly enjoy the experience vicariously. Then again, I guess I am a creep like all the rest of us.

 

 

 

Bring back Fin Fang Foom :-)

[JT Brooklyn]

Whip and Philly..Watch Out for what you ask for...It seems the "YOU" Section in some Reviewer's cases just might go on for 3 Paragraphs at the very least! LOL

 

;-)

[whipped guy]

RE: …someone that does not like to divulge what was done during the session is likely not to want to provide that information either.

 

Philly… That is the problem, as some guys feel afraid or embarrassed to reveal certain things about themselves. One simple solution is to use a different ID when submitting reviews as opposed to your forum ID.

 

JT… I once did submit a review in which the YOU section was a paragraph… I almost felt guilty in stealing the thunder from the guy I was reviewing, but ultimately felt that I needed to put my experience into the proper perspective for prospective clients.

[Philly Guy]

>Whip and Philly..Watch Out for what you ask for...It seems

>the "YOU" Section in some Reviewer's cases just

>might go on for 3 Paragraphs at the very least! LOL

>

>;-)

 

JT - I am sure the Mensa will not have a lot to say there. It would go like this:

 

I am a professor at a Community College. I am tenured so they can't get rid of me, even though the students hate me. I am boring in bed; you can ask my students. I don't like to top because I may get dirty and I won't bottom because I hate pain. I don't like oral because it takes too much time. I usually look for escorts that I can read my poetry to; but usually they fall asleep and I have to pay for a second hour.

[Philly Guy]

>And like most people whose brain is clearly in their ass,

>phillyguy, I never said the people on this site were creepy. I

>said people who want each and every sexual detail were creepy.

>I realize with your IQ of 28 you don't get the distinction.

 

By the way - if there are any attorneys out there; does anyone know the statute of limitations on IQ tests? Those bastards told me mine was 35 and the Professor tested me at 28 - I think I need to sue someone.