POLL: An escort reviewing another escort

[Steven_Draker]

In order to have a larger base for the poll I wanted to create a separate thread, since some of you weren't able to find it. The last time we had over 100 voters.

 

http://www.geocities.com/stevendraker/poll.jpg

 

[a href=http://freepollkit.com/index.php?browse=viewpoll&pollid=1001436]Click here[/a] to take part in the poll.

 

You can only vote once and the vote is anonymous.

Please note that this poll is not official and is only for entertainment purposes.

 

Steven Draker ~

 

http://www.hotsexystud.com/uk

http://www.male4malescorts.com/reviews/steven_draker_brussels.html

[Steven_Draker]

Currently 51% yes and 49% no, however the Florida vote cause troubles ... :+

 

http://history.acusd.edu/gen/USPics43/2000-florida-recount01b.jpg

 

Steven Draker ~

http://www.gaydar.be/sexystud25

[flguy]

Look Steven, I only voted once.....Really

[+ honcho]

Dollars-to-Donuts the vote would have been more lopsided had the parenthetical comment been "(providing the reviewer *was* paying commercial rates)" instead.

[+ Tom Isern]

Steven,

I've been waiting for you to post a result before commenting on my review of Carlos Morales that inspired this poll. Do you have a timetable in mind?

Thanks!

Tom

[Lookin]

Tom, you can hit the "Click here" link in Steven's original post, and then hit "View results". Looks like it's updated constantly.

 

As of this morning, it's "Yes" by one vote, so keep 'em coming! So to speak.

[Steven_Draker]

Thanks to all of you who cast their vote.

Currently, Friday May 26th 4:40 PM EDT we have 122 votes

 

61 votes or 50% for YES and 61 votes 50% for NO.

 

Thank you all for your participation.

 

Steven Draker ~

http://www.HotSexyStud.com/uk

[Steven_Draker]

> I've been waiting for you to post a result before commenting on my review

> of Carlos Morales that inspired this poll. Do you have a timetable in mind?

 

Hey Tom,

The purpose of the poll was to get the opinion of a large number of readers and posters from this board.

There is no winner and there is no any decision to take. As as stated previously this is only for entertainment purposes.

 

Regards, Steven ~

http://www.HotSexyStud.com/uk

[rickyricardo]

If your not the paying party, you didnt hire the escort, why should you review them? If you hire, you did pay the escort then you can review them.

[rickyricardo]

If your not the paying party, you didnt hire the escort, why should you review them? If you hire, you did pay the escort then you can review them.

[JamesK840]

My $0.02: I think it's OK to 'introduce' somebody even if you didn't pay them. Hopefully you at least experienced them sexually, but even if not as long as the review reflects accurately on the escort I have no problem with it... IF it's the reviewed guy's FIRST review.

 

If one escort pays another escort, of course there's nothing wrong with them reviewing the experience... as long as they do their best to be, what is it, 'fair in their judgment and accurate in their reporting'.

 

Otherwise, (this is IF it wasn't a paid encounter) it's just a way of bumping friends into the new reviews section and worthless to us clients.

 

Then there's a gray area: an escort who works with another escort, both paid by a third party... hmm, I dunno... I'd of course prefer to read a review written by the third party, but if he's not the reviewing type...