Heartless Man has ruined my night

[Boston Guy]

>>Thanks for prooving that you are

>>Mr. Holloway's Stalker. Now

>>I know I am not

>>the only one that suspects

>>you of doing it.

>>While you continously question my

>>credibilty, I think after tonight

>>many will question yours.

>

>

>This is one of his AOL

>profiles:

>

>BubblesandCloud9

>Member Name: Doug

>Location: Rhode Island

>Sex: Male

>Marital Status: Gay and married

>Hobbies: just hanging with family and

>the beach Cant forget

>about my poodle

>Computers: Compaq Presario

>Occupation: Cardiologist

>Personal Quote: Live each day like

>its ur last

>

>This is the other for a

>profile just created today:

>

>coolguy69781

>Member Name: Doug

>Location: Massachusetts, Rhode Island

>Sex: Male

>Marital Status: Married, bicurious

>Hobbies: I like to do various

>things, but at the moment

>I don' t think anything

>could make me happy

>Computers: Compaq

>Occupation: Cardiologist

>Personal Quote: Live each day like

>its your last

>

>Now which are you, Doug?

>Gay or bicurious?

>Do you have a wife or

>a male lover?

>

>You were on the Bubblesandcloud9 screenname

>on AOL, not AIM I

>should point out, yet now

>I get this response back

>when i tried to send

>an e-mail to you:

>

>The following problems occurred while processing

>your request:

>

>bubblesandcloud9 - This is not a

>known member.

>

>How can your family respond back?

> You just created the

>other screenname, so they can't

>know that one.

 

 

BofN:

 

While not addressing the appropriateness of posting this information here -- you can already predict my thoughts on that -- the message you have received is the message you will get if the AOL member has used the privacy options to prevent you from contacting them by email.

 

BG

[BewareofNick]

Actually, that's not the case. I tried from 3 different screennames. It's the message you get when the screenname has been deleted.

[BewareofNick]

But you know what? You're absolutely right. This forum is about soemthing important, not this petty little pissing contest. If I respond to anything further here, I will do so over in the lounge, or maybe not at all.

[Guest bicuriouscoolman]

Like I said before, Why are you trying to contact me? Buddy, you seriously need help.

[Guest regulation]

>Jeez, Reg, welcome back!

 

You know the old saying. If you call upon the Devil -- as you did yesterday -- he may appear; but getting him to leave is not quite so easy. :-)

 

 

>You're usually a much more careful

>reader than that. And

>usually you seem to do

>a more careful job of

>reading all of the posts.

> Perhaps you missed the

>post where I encouraged BofN

>to continue posting whatever he

>thought he should on any

>topic whatsoever.

 

 

Please consult your dictionary. If you do, you will discover that the words "reading" and "believing" are not synonyms.

 

 

>Or perhaps instead you're simply trying

>to start a fight?

>

>If so, it won't work.

>Although you have posted something

>like six posts so far

>tonight trying to fan the

>flames of a fight, including

>a couple of posts where

>you used the word 'enemies',

>it won't work.

 

 

You do love your conspiracy theories, don't you? :-) I'll bet you have every episode of "Millenium" on videotape.

 

>

>BofN seems to me to be

>a perfectly good guy with

>whom I have agreed on

>some topics and disagreed on

>others. I hope he

>does continue to post.

>A healthy dialog is a

>good thing.

>

 

Then you have plenty to look forward to. :-)

 

 

>And as for the above comment

>you quoted, no, I wasn't

>encouraging him to shut up,

>as you put it.

>I was quite literally suggesting

>that he might, for his

>own sake, he might want

>to carefully consider staying far,

>far away from AH.

>

 

 

As I said, reading and believing are two different things. I'll be watching. :-)

[Guest regulation]

>Regualtion, when you call them, you

>certainly call them right.

>No one worried over the

>death of his sister is

>going to check back in

>on this site. They

>are going to care less

>about what goes on here.

> What a load of

>horseshit.

 

As an old friend of mine in politics once said, I try to be cynical, but it's difficult to keep up. :-)

[Guest cmp]

Doug, please accept my heartfelt condolences for your terrible loss.

[Guest bicuriouscoolman]

Thank you, I appreciate that very much

[BewareofNick]

Last night, I saw Coolguy69781 come on line. He signed

off and immediately MassStudXXX signed on. I don't know

how many of you are on AOL, but this happens when a person is switching screennames. He then did it again from MassStudXXX to Anthony Holloway1. I've been 95% sure all along that 'Doug' was Anthony, but this confirmed it for me tonight.

 

I guess what pisses me off is that Anthony has used the national tragedy (claiming his sister was killed in the Pentagon crash) as part of his way of doing business. Normally I'd be satisfied with just knowing, but the fact that he pulled at everyone's emotions and basically just disgraced the memories of the true victims enrages me to no end.

 

I also sent "Doug" an e-mail offering condolences and to help him with the information that he requested about Washington, DC. He replied back that he wanted information on a cemetery in the DC area, but he already got the info he needed. This didn't ring true to me, but I sent no reply. Then I saw the screenname flip.

 

The people who died IMHO deserve better then to be used by Anthony. I find what he has done to be reprehensible and testimony as to just what type of person he truly is.

[Guest regulation]

>The people who died IMHO deserve

>better then to be used

>by Anthony. I find

>what he has done to

>be reprehensible and testimony as

>to just what type of

>person he truly is.

 

BofN,

 

Thanks for continuing to post on this subject despite those who attempt to denigrate and discourage you. Anyone who posts a negative review or comment about a specific escort here risks being slandered ("drug addict," "stalker," "cynic," "bitter queen") by the escort and others who have an interest in suppressing such information. You should be commended for incurring this risk in the service of truth.

[Guest]

I've been off the boards for a while, but I knew BewareOfNick was right after reading the first post. The whole death of sister in the Pentagon immediately seemed like a cheap way of generating sympathy. It now seems to be proven that BON was, in fact, correct.

[BewareofNick]

Jsut wanted to thank both of you for your support.