Jump to content

Does Kevin Slater (SF escort) bareback?


JT Brooklyn
This topic is 6749 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

IMHO..This sounds more like a "Statement than a Question". IF your interested in K.Slater he is the only one to answer this Very Important "Question". IF that is what it is?..Except for the "Wacked Out Review" he received recently.. Nothing says anything about UnSafe Play! :+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Although the originator of the thread has responded to his statement/question-- the only thing that I'd like to suggest is: honey, read the reviews first then post!

 

I, too, am interested in being fully ravished by Mr. Slater, but if the statement about him had been different, I would NOT have been interested although the pole is mighty enticing.....:9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I smell a stalker.

 

A careful check of the the reviews and the Message Center logs provides me enough information to believe that the originator of this thread and the reviewer are the same person. After speaking on the phone with Kevin; who was able to volunteer information that he didn't know that I was already aware of, that smell got a bit more sour.

 

Sir, you stated that you heard about it from a friend in Atlanta and then threw it out as a question. You then went and read your own review about Slater and had your question answered.

 

As someone else said: "Methinks this is a test", and if so Sir, I don't think you passed.

 

Daddy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ChgoBoy

>I think I smell a stalker.

>

>A careful check of the the reviews and the Message Center logs

>provides me enough information to believe that the originator

>of this thread and the reviewer are the same person. After

>speaking on the phone with Kevin; who was able to volunteer

>information that he didn't know that I was already aware of,

>that smell got a bit more sour.

>

>Sir, you stated that you heard about it from a friend in

>Atlanta and then threw it out as a question. You then went

>and read your own review about Slater and had your question

>answered.

>

>As someone else said: "Methinks this is a test", and if so

>Sir, I don't think you passed.

>

>Daddy

 

I think it would be useful to revisit some reviews that are posted in the review center to add some light to this escorts behavior. I have reproduced this work from a fellow poster who could not be with us here today. Thanks for the investigative work bud.

 

http://www.male4malescorts.com/reviews/kevinslatersf.html

 

From Review #26, 6/5/2005:

 

I had told him on the phone that I wanted to get fucked, but I didn't tell him that I wanted it raw. Another San Francisco escort told me that Slater loves to bareback, so I wasn't surprised when Slater responded to my request with, “That's the only way I like it, but first we have to clean you up.”

 

When we finally got to the bed, Slater rolled me over on my stomach and started teasing my asshole with his dick. My conscience got the better of me and I stopped him and told him that I was poz. He just smiled and pushed hard, till his whole dick was buried deep inside me. He fucks like a stallion, and he could sense that I was getting close. “Don't come yet,” he whispered. “I want you to fuck me too.” Within seconds I had him on his back, his legs high over his head. He spread his ass cheeks apart, and started fingering himself with lube. My dick is really thick and most guys have trouble taking it, but Slater is the ultimate bottom bitch. I started to ease the head into his hole slowly, but he just grabbed my ass and pushed me deep and hard all the way in. Wow, this guy can take cock…. and more, as I found out.

 

From Review #22, 12/28/2004:

 

The condom apparently hurt him. I was not used to fucking a guy without a condom, since I was uncut and found that painful. When I told him that, he gave up on it.

 

I wanted Kevin to work on my nipples with his mouth so I can come. In the lusty haze I was in and with bad judgement, I begged him to put his cock back in my ass again WITHOUT A CONDOM. Kevin fully complied and this time I felt his hard cock. I jacked myself hard and blew my load in a few minutes.

 

From Review ##16, 5/26/2004: (Nothing overt here but no mention of a condom)

 

He pushed his cock in (it is as big as the pics suggest) and allowed me time to get used to it. He then proceeded to pound my ass while chewing on my ear and whispering in my ear. He must have pounded me for what seemed like 30 mins nonstop. When he shot I felt his cock pulsing in my ass. He lay ontop of me with his cock still in my ass and within 5 mins started getting hard again and he delivered another fantastic performance. he then layed down on top of me withhis cock still inside and we stayed that way for at least 15 mins. He then pulled out, we talked some more, I sucked on his cock for bit then showered and dressed.

 

And then there's Kevin's video career to consider:

 

Kevin Slater fucks Stephan

. . . PLANTIN' SEED 2 starts off with a Bang : Kevin Slater is one of San Francisco's premier studs, packin' a big ol' 9-1/2 inch manrammer ( I swear to God it swells to well over 10 when he's really on it ). He's wanted to shoot his seed into the guts of Euro-boy Stephan ever since we showed Kevin pics of the cute 'n' innocent bottom-boy. And these two connect — butt good!

 

 

Bucking like a rabid mule, Slater shoves his big curved cock harder and deeper into innocent little Stephan's ass, ramming it deeper and deeper until you see him hit THAT SPOT ( yeah, you know the spot ). Stephan's eyes just suddenly glaze and he's on that different planet that a primal fuck puts you on. And Kevin just rides him hard, rammin' and slammin' until he gets the job done!

 

 

 

 

Then Kevin unroots his long rod from Stephan's reamed-out hole and Stephan catches the residue spooge on a cookie, jacks off onto the cookie himself — and then daintily chomps the spooge-chip cookie right down. Munch-Munch-Munch. The succulent tangy taste of a

:-)

 

Sorry, the pics of RAW fucking did not transfer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Tampa Yankee

>Here's another piece of important information that is

>connected to this thread. Again, the right to know v. the

>right to conceal should always be the motivation when hiring

>men for sex.

>

 

Chgo Boy, what IS your point?

 

Mr champa asked a question . An answer was strongly implied by reading the reviews. Someone offered the best advice -- ask the escort. Mr. champa's curiosity was satisifed by the reviews according to his post recorded as response #2. Sman broke the video information, complete with hyperlink, in post #6.

 

So, at this point, what exactly is YOUR point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>So, at this point, what exactly is YOUR point?

 

The original poster wanted to know if Kevin Slater barebacks and if anyone has any information one way or the other on this question. Here's what he asked:

 

<<The idea of a popular escort who goes from city to city barebacking makes me nervous. Is it true?>>

 

ChgoBoy has been helpfully and courteously posting exactly the type of information which the original poster requested be furnished about this escort by the members here.

 

Did you really not see that? What did you think was happening?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Tampa Yankee

What I saw and I was obvious to anyone else that read the thread was that Mr champa asked his question, by his own post it was answered to his satisfaction, and another contributor, sman, pointed out the bareback video site complete with hyperlink. I saw NOTHING new in chgoboy's post over 20 hours after sman broke the video site even though it seemed to be presented as 'breakig news'. Don't you see that? Hence my simple question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Tampa Yankee

>Kevin Slater is coverboy of the day. Is this Daddy's implicit

>endorsement of barebacking?

 

IYO should barebacking escorts be denied coverboy status? Even if they seem to be 'out' about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Tampa Yankee

>Yes.

 

THanks. I Iove simple answers that are straight to the point and wish we saw more of it around.

 

I suspect that the coverboy review has higher readership on average than the others. Woudn't your ban lessen the notoriety about the barebacking? Is that a good thing? Would the presence of the pic outwiegh that factor ? If so, why do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't know. In the present instance, the escort in question has been the subject of a current thread about his barebacking. To pick him as coverboy at that very time, I think, does make a statement of support for the escort, and, by implication, for his behavior. Overall, however, I doubt many people here will be affected in their own behavior just because a coverboy escort is also a barebacker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The solution to barebacking is simple: we do what we want. We'll all do what we want to anyway, it's not like anyone is *forcing* us to have sex at all (unless it's rape).

 

Singling out the escort who barebacks doesn't tell the whole of the story. It leaves out the dozens/hundreds of his clients who make the active choice to bareback with him, and it leaves out the thousands of clients out there barebacking with other popular escorts. And for every escort who barebacks, there are thousands and hundreds of thousands of ordinary joe-schmoe gay guys all around us who also have decided to bareback.

 

If an escort can't ply his trade with another consenting adult as they feel themselves freely moved to do, maybe we should make bareback sex itself a criminal offense, punishable by surgical castration and emasculation as the recidivism rate would be so very high.

 

No, singling out escorts is silly.

 

Either we do it, or we don't. No great choice, really. It's rather akin to tobacco. Every filthy cancer stick is another spin of Russian roulette with some seriously nasty oncogenes, but, self-loathing hypocrites that we are, our moral opprobrium we save for a steamingly sexy sin, rather than an embarassingly infantile one. It just happens that the chances are just really, Really, REALLY bad for those who bareback without sober and serious thought, planning, and discipline.

 

Also, if an escort sometimes barebacks can't ply his trade with another consenting adult who always insists on a condom (or femdom) as they feel themselves freely moved to do, maybe we should make all safer sex with anyone who sometimes barebacks a criminal offence as well. The only thing next to do after that is figure out who's lying.

 

No, that whole approach is infantile, smacks of false morality and, worse, wooly-headedness.

 

Hysteria over barebacking escorts is hardly becoming, after all it's only your own sweet booty you need to worry about. You don't know if joe-schmoe trick-of-the-year you picked up last night has ever barebacked, *not really*, but there's only one thing necessary: a bit of personal responsibility on your own part. You cover your ass by covering his cock. It's as simple as a condom. Or a "femdom".

 

And you do it every time you have sex. Unless you want to become one with the moral underclass you've created--those who bareback, even sometimes.

 

*Every* escort who fucks my ass has a condom on. Every last one of them, even the simpering "D/D free" ones, because I don't *really* know which one has or hasn't been barebacking. It's that simple. The easiest safe approach is to assume everyone you have sex with is barebacking, and insist on appropriate protection from the possible consequences of their actions.

 

The most difficult approach involves two soon-not-to-be-virgins, and true monogamy. Or, for the imaginative, any number of soon-not-to-be-virgins, and true endogamy within the marital community.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ChgoBoy

>The solution to barebacking is simple: we do what we want.

>We'll all do what we want to anyway, it's not like anyone is

>*forcing* us to have sex at all (unless it's rape).

 

There is no solution to barebacking except for educating those that have not yet fallen into your irresponsible pattern of behavior that represents one of an idiot.

 

 

>Singling out the escort who barebacks doesn't tell the whole

>of the story.

 

It tells enough for those wanting to make an informed and educated decision on what level of risk they are willing to take in whom they choose to have sex with.

 

>It leaves out the dozens/hundreds of his clients

>who make the active choice to bareback with him, and it leaves

>out the thousands of clients out there barebacking with other

>popular escorts.

 

Your numbers are as irresponsible as your behavior. I challenge you to present the data that supports your claim.

 

 

>And for every escort who barebacks, there are

>thousands and hundreds of thousands of ordinary joe-schmoe gay

>guys all around us who also have decided to bareback.

 

Your claim continues to get more frightening and your only reasoning behind it is nothing less than trying to justify your irresponsible behavior.

 

>If an escort can't ply his trade with another consenting adult

>as they feel themselves freely moved to do, maybe we should

>make bareback sex itself a criminal offense, punishable by

>surgical castration and emasculation as the recidivism rate

>would be so very high.

 

Every escort and every consenting adult should bareback themselves to death as far as I'm concerned with no criminal or societial decry, as long as the escort has been honest with the client what he does with other clients in regard to passing the bug of death to an un-suspecting client.

 

>No, singling out escorts is silly.

 

No, it's the responsible thing to do.

>

>Either we do it, or we don't. No great choice, really. It's

>rather akin to tobacco. Every filthy cancer stick is another

>spin of Russian roulette with some seriously nasty oncogenes,

>but, self-loathing hypocrites that we are, our moral

>opprobrium we save for a steamingly sexy sin, rather than an

>embarassingly infantile one. It just happens that the chances

>are just really, Really, REALLY bad for those who bareback

>without sober and serious thought, planning, and discipline.

 

Wrong. My smoking will not infect my sex partner with a deadly disease. Can't you see that or is your head so far up your unprotected ass that all you care about is your own selfish sexual behavior?

>

>Also, if an escort sometimes barebacks can't ply his trade

>with another consenting adult who always insists on a condom

>(or femdom) as they feel themselves freely moved to do, maybe

>we should make all safer sex with anyone who sometimes

>barebacks a criminal offence as well. The only thing next to

>do after that is figure out who's lying.

 

That has nothing to really do about your arguement supporting deadly, unprotected sex. As long as the escort is honest in his behavior to the questions of the client, I have no issues with that. Bang away. But as Woodlawn has so many times here before made clear, the only people who would ever know what occured between two consenting adults would be a video tape of the illegal act. It's really an unproveable.

>

>No, that whole approach is infantile, smacks of false morality

>and, worse, wooly-headedness.

>

>Hysteria over barebacking escorts is hardly becoming, after

>all it's only your own sweet booty you need to worry about.

>You don't know if joe-schmoe trick-of-the-year you picked up

>last night has ever barebacked, *not really*, but there's only

>one thing necessary: a bit of personal responsibility on your

>own part. You cover your ass by covering his cock. It's as

>simple as a condom. Or a "femdom".

 

Excuse me, but didn't you just shoot your own arguement in the foot?

>

>And you do it every time you have sex. Unless you want to

>become one with the moral underclass you've created--those who

>bareback, even sometimes.

>

>*Every* escort who fucks my ass has a condom on. Every last

>one of them, even the simpering "D/D free" ones, because I

>don't *really* know which one has or hasn't been barebacking.

>It's that simple. The easiest safe approach is to assume

>everyone you have sex with is barebacking, and insist on

>appropriate protection from the possible consequences of their

>actions.

 

Agree 100%

>

>The most difficult approach involves two

>soon-not-to-be-virgins, and true monogamy. Or, for the

>imaginative, any number of soon-not-to-be-virgins, and true

>endogamy within the marital community.

 

Again, I use the wisdom of Woodlawn's comments of a day ago, (excuse me Woodlawn) But there is absolutely no risk of transfering HIV to another individual if both parties are negative. However, it's almost impossible to ensure that this is true based upon many factors of exposure and incubation periods. Youth, virgins; the most vulnerable victims to this cruel disease need only to look to the 80's for answers to what their future holds if they choose to believe barebacking is simply the way to go cause it feels good and hundreds of thousands of guys are doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it's worth, with the lead I got from this thread I did a little searching through Treasure Island's web site and discovered that Slater actually made his bareback video debut last year in the original Plantin' Seed. So I rented it. If you have a strong enough stomach and like to watch grown men use a funnel to inject a cup full of come into someone's ass, then by all means enjoy yourself.

 

And make sure to take a look at the black band around Slater's right leg. It's a house arrest sensor, the kind of thing that Martha Stewart had to wear around the house when she got out of prison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been with Kevin a number of times including a weekend in the Russian River. He's always used a condom with me and has never asked to do otherwise.

 

I know of other escorts who perfer to bareback and some of them have been reviewed here as doing so. Some have been mentioned a number of times in reviews without this reaction I'm seeing for Kevin in the Message Center.

 

As far as I'm concerned, we each are individually responsible for our own actions. Let's not blame the escort when the client is willinging. When having sex with anyone (escort or not), one should assume that the other guy is poz (even if not) and act accordingly by playing safe!!

 

Let's stop this witch hunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not a witch hunt. In fact, the thread is fascinating.... and important. On the simplest (and most important) level, it reminds us that we're responsible for our own health. And I'm glad that Mr. Slater is willing to use a condom with clients who request it.

 

But clients are easy marks for sociopaths like Slater. It's easy for a bottom who hires a "famous brand" like Slater to forget that he should be the one calling the shots, not Slater. Re-read review #22. The guy who wrote it paints a vivid picture of how such a situation can turn lethal.

 

And Slater's response to review #22 is why it's important to keep threads like this going. From what I've learned in this thread, it's obvious that Slater barebacked the guy (the client ASKED FOR IT and Slater was happy to accommodate him). The client's regret at what happened is heartfelt and sincere; Slater's response to the review is an obvious smarmy lie. We now know that Slater specializes in bareback escorting (see his ad on bareback.com), so it was business as usual to fuck the guy raw.

 

But Slater knows that lots of clients -- especially the hapless straight guys who go home to wife and kids ---are scared to death of HIV. So, he has to maintain the illusion of compassion and conscience. That illusion is gone now. Hopefully his "starring" role in Treasure Island's "Plantin Seed 2" will dissuade HIV negative clients from hiring him.

 

What's very very sad, however, is that Slater's response to review #22 still remains on the site. Why hasn't it been removed in light of everything that's been disclosed here? Is it because of the advertising dollars that Slater represents to the site? And to make him Coverboy of the Day, as though he deserves kid glove treatment. For what? For lyiing and threatening the health and well-being of hundreds of gay men?

 

Yeah. Wear a condom when you bottom for Slater. Make sure it never slips off in your asshole. Watch carefully to make sure that it doesn't tear, Or, save yourself the anxiety and money and just jerk off and get some sleep.

 

Enjoy the Pride Celebrations in your town. Love yourself and your brother. Be safe!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...