Jump to content

NYC Campus Escorts changed owners


ready182
This topic is 8136 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted

I did a search of the MC & didn't find anything on this subject. I recently discovered that "mike" is no longer the owner of Campus. Was wondering about others experience & thoughts about the new campus???

Posted

>I did a search of the MC & didn't find anything on this

>subject. I recently discovered that "mike" is no longer the

>owner of Campus. Was wondering about others experience &

>thoughts about the new campus???

 

Mike left a few months ago. Now Philip is running the show, everything still seems the same but a lot of new escorts...

 

When in doubt I whip it out:+

Posted

I think this was discussed a few months back about the time it happened. They still seem to get good PR So I am sure Mike turned it over to good hands or good something. HUGS Chuck

Posted

An escort told me that all escorts have to "audition" with a rather large guy at Campus before they get to work there (at least before change of ownership). He said as a result he'd never work there but he has friends who do. Does anyone know whether this is true?

Posted

>An escort told me that all escorts have to "audition" with a

>rather large guy at Campus before they get to work there (at

>least before change of ownership). He said as a result he'd

>never work there but he has friends who do. Does anyone know

>whether this is true?

 

YES it was true, Mike wanted to audition all his new boys:P What a way to get "FREE" sex:9

Guest Alias726
Posted

Is this standard practice? Or just a hint of sarcasm lost on a newbie?

 

Pls explain.

 

Thanks

 

 

 

 

 

You can call me Homosexu-Al. =)

Posted

It would seem to me, as discussed in a thread 3-4 weeks ago, that that would be dangerous in terms of any police wanting to find a way to close an agency down. Wouldn't that be a "direct connection" between the agency and what "actually" goes on in terms of a legal sense, of someone set him up in a sting?

Posted

>It would seem to me, as discussed in a thread 3-4 weeks ago,

>that that would be dangerous in terms of any police wanting to

>find a way to close an agency down. Wouldn't that be a

>"direct connection" between the agency and what "actually"

>goes on in terms of a legal sense, of someone set him up in a

>sting?

 

I think the owner tries out the escort to see if he can be trusted, and then asks for the escort to sign a contract saying that what ever he does with clients is consensual, and not required by the Agency. I think you are right though that this does seem to leave exposure for a sting against the agency.

 

As for Campus, I am surprised these last few threads have drawn so few results. Mike might have been disliked by some escorts, but others swear by him. I think the quality and standards were better under him. There are a lot more faces, but some of the best have left, and the new ones seem like part-timers to me.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...