JJ Stutz -- suspicious review

[N.N.]

About today's review for JJ Stutz (San Francisco):

 

It contains the same misspelling ("buetiful") as does his own

nakedraver.com profile, and also a similar textual mannerism

(a word in all caps with a tilde at the end, e.g. "YES~").

Read the rest of the review and decide for yourself whether

it sounds real or fake.

 

His nakedraver profile is indexed under the name he publishes

in his escort ads, thus I don't consider it a breach of

privacy to mention it here. And the profile had been

mentioned in this forum before without raising any eyebrows

(see http://www.male4malescorts.com/dcforum/DCForumID1/4428.html ).

 

Hoo, are you still putting flags on suspect reviews?

This one sure deserves one.

[marc anthony]

N.N. : Very suspicious review... I agree. If JJ wrote his own review, then that is in perfect harmony with his very flaky personality. He is hyper, fun loving, totally uninhibited, and willing to chance anything!

 

On the other hand, I wrote the other review, which I guarantee you is 100% real. He is FANTASTIC in bed... maybe as good as any escort I have ever had (must be that porn star training, lol). I would also add that having spent 24 hours with him, I always felt very safe with him. He is a cute, nice, though unusual kid.

 

One last thing about him, if this questionable review thing raises questions about his integrity... about noon after our overnight, he wanted to go shopping, but I had to go elsewhere. So I paid him, kissed him, and sent him on his way. I told him that our overnight was over, but if he wanted to join me for dinner off the clock to meet me at a certain place at a certain time. Sure enough, at the time, he was there, and he showed me the things he had bought. I slipped some money into his hand after dinner, saying that I wanted to pay for his shopping. He smiled, kissed me, and slipped it back... saying, "no way, you've been too good to me already." And on that note, we spent the rest of the evening just hanging out and chatting (he did wear me out doing this, though.... think UNTRAINED PUPPY).

 

Make your own mind up... pros and cons to JJ. But me, I'd hire him again in a aplit second, and will. In fact, I'd make a special stop in the city he happens to appear in just to see him. I know he is in SoCal soon... I'd get him before he vanishes into the night, which I know he is very capable of doing.

[N.N.]

marc anthony, thanks for the further info. I never doubted

your review, and I don't doubt what you've said above.

You have a track record (today's review not only contains

various suspicious elements, it's also from a first timer).

 

As you said, everyone will consider the pros and cons

themselves. As far as I'm concerned, if JJ wrote today's

review, that outweighs the rest of what I know about him.

 

Phony reviews make a mockery out of this site. I can't

even cut him slack about this because he's so young;

deceit of this nature just stinks.

[sman]

marc anthony are you in love ??:+ }> i think so. and very much in lust. i would also i think. hehe:9 x(

[Guest AustinMarc]

Suspicious, but damn funny, too!

 

I always enjoy a good laugh, and from the "5 star restuant" to the thought of spending 1000 dollars "to cuddle" from a "medium build 6 foot 3" guy, this review made my day. There's a pic of this young man on his "raver" site with a pacifier in his mouth..... any questions?

[Guest NakedTony]

RE: Suspicious, but damn funny, too!

 

>There's a pic of this young man on his "raver" site with a pacifier in his mouth..... any questions?

 

Yea, I've got a question. Isn't a pacifier used as a "code" or "signal" that the person is a drug user? I thought I read this in another message on this board about 8-12 months ago.

[+ Lucky]

RE: Suspicious, but damn funny, too!

 

As I understand it, ecstacy boys use pacifiers to lubricate the mouth cuz the drug makes it so dry.

[Guest Brazil Nut]

RE: Suspicious, but damn funny, too!

 

>I always enjoy a good laugh, and from the "5 star restuant"

 

Actually what he said was "restruant".

Is he playing hookey too, or just nookie? ;-)

[Guest Brazil Nut]

RE: Suspicious, but damn funny, too!

 

>Yea, I've got a question. Isn't a pacifier used as a "code"

>or "signal" that the person is a drug user?

 

Yup.

[marc anthony]

All I can say is this...

 

Use this site to decide if you want to hire someone. I think I very fairly described the pros and cons of JJ. I have also hired well over a hundred twinks from all over the world...and I know what I like.

 

I would hire JJ again in a second.

[Guest]

RE: Suspicious, but damn funny, too!

 

I thought "raver" meant drug user... No "code" to break there...

[Huey]

Marc you should not have to justify your review. Your reviews are always balanced. You seem to hit all the right points and JJ's was no exception .

 

The current review is obviously written by JJ. Will that stop me from hiring him, nope.

 

Can anyone look me in the eyes and tell me that he is the only one to write his own review, go on I dare you . Hey he is new to this world ... and he made a miscalculation. When I was his age I made many :'( .

 

-----------

WAR IS OVER

if you want it

GIVE PEACE A CHANCE

[Guest AustinMarc]

>The current review is obviously written by JJ. Will that

>stop me from hiring him, nope.

 

OK. Although it's the "funnest" review I saw yesterday, I just think as a service to us "rich guys" that this review should be flagged as an obvious phoney if there is to be any consistency around here. I've seen it done from Hoo Boy with other reviews, and 'ignorance of the law' (or being cute for that matter), is no excuse. I'm angry because it boils down to me to simply a blatant ad for 1000 dollars to "cuddle" (and not much more) with "rich guys" ... preferably those "not looking for anything sexual".

[N.N.]

Thanks AustinMarc for saying that. Maybe if a few of us email

HooBoy, a flag will go on the review.

 

I made mistakes when I was young too, but a key reason I learned

something from them was that the mistakes had consequences.

[Barry]

RE: Suspicious, but damn funny, too!

 

>Yea, I've got a question. Isn't a pacifier used as a "code"

>or "signal" that the person is a drug user? I thought I read

>this in another message on this board about 8-12 months ago.

 

The pacifier craze (which has come and gone) was pretty much used by guys on X or Tina. Since both are a form of speed many find themselves grinding their teeth and clenching their jaws. The pacifier supposedly helped stop this, while making the guy look pretty stupid. It could have helped stimulate saliva for the dry mouth these substances cause. I guess since this was the purpose you could say it was code for drug use but that wasn't the origin of the fad. Some clubs banned their use.

 

Barry

[guyinsf]

I think that certain escorts have been "flagged" in the past based on a history of suspicious (or negative) reviews, but I don't think I've ever seen an individual review flagged or even an escort flagged at all for quite some time. Is my memory failing me or didn't this issue come up some time ago and HooBoy mentioned that he was no longer using that graphic to flag questionable escorts?

[+ Lucky]

The main page says the last reply is by Hooboy, but it wasn't there this morning and it ain't there now. I am curious what he had to say.