Malibu aka California Boy

[Troyster]

In the reviews for today (Wednesday) there is a guy named Malibu from New Jersey. I KNOW I saw him in Playgirl a while back and right then I knew I wanted to know him much better. Today I see the review -- be still my heart. Help -- one review says he is to die for and the other says he is a con artist. Who knows the real story about this guy? Anyone to cast the tie breaking vote -- if he worth the hire?????

[Guest steveyboy]

[http://freemail.gaymale.com/adult/escorts/escortmen/malibu_017.jpg]

[Guest steveyboy]

[http://freemail.gaymale.com/adult/escorts/escortmen/malibu_015_th.jpg]

[ready4boi]

This is a lesson on how this site CAN be used. If you don't know anything about a guy advertising he's an escort, chances are he may have been mentioned on the message board. That's why if you check and see you may get the scoop before wasting your money. To reiterate info I posted previously, Byron is totally STRAIGHT and is as open-minded as a straight guy is gonna get. In other words he'll let you touch him and lick but that's about it. You can forget about him getting hard. That's why Byron is fine if you're into worshipping his body and no oral.

[ready4boi]

One more thing, Byron is a really nice guy. In my opinion he should not be escorting. And he says he 25 but I think he's several years older.

[Guest Fin Fang Foom]

>Byron is

>totally STRAIGHT and is as

>open-minded as a straight guy

>is gonna get.

 

"Totally STRAIGHT", eh? How many "totally straight" guys let fags suck their cocks? To quote my friend Fred: "would your FATHER let a guy do that"? Granted, there are straight guys who have been blown because they were drunk or other extenuating circumstances (like PRISON!), but let's get real here ladies, THIS guy is not totally straight - he's got some "issues", otherwise he'd be advertising ONLY for the ladies. He's doing this because he gets off on it and he rationalizes it by saying he will only do certain things because he's "straight". Snore. I wonder if that holds true when he goes home with some guy from the gym and they both talk about their girlfriends while they've got their cocks up each other's asses? I find this whole scenario a huge bore. To quote Fred again: "Closets are for clothes."

[Guest Esc_Tracker]

Sorry Fin, but I think you are making essentially the same mistake many straights do when thinking talking about gays. Though most people fit into broad general cluster types in terms of what interests them and what they can respond to sexually, every person is different.

 

Technically, a homosexual is indeed one who participates in sexual activity with one or more partners of the same sex. But this definition does not say a whole lot about why such activities take place, or the degree and range of such activities an individual might actually enjoy or be able to perform. Just because having your dick sucked by another guy lies within your realm of tolerance (helped along perhaps by monetary inducements) does not mean you can also bottom for another guy without serious discomfort or can be sufficiently stimulated by the prospect of topping a guy to maintain an erection. Surely the frequent division of gays into tops and bottoms should have clued you into this.

 

Try to look at escorts as more than just slabs of meat with artificial inhibitions. They know themselves better than we can know them. If a guy tells you you can suck his dick but that is as far as he can go, you can take his word for it unless he uses this as a prelude to asking a higher price for extra service. It's members of this latter category who have issues, not guys like Malibu/Byron who could become very wealthy indeed if they could really "get into" a broader range of activities with their clients.

 

Guys like Malibu/Byron who are willing to try the scene but can't fully exploit it are to be admired (for their open-mindedness) and to some degree pitied (for their limitations), but not mocked.

 

Esc-Tracker

[ready4boi]

I totally agree. Think of it another way. If you are a gay man like Richard Simmons and a woman pays you to spend an evening with her and then undresses and touches you, you are still a gay man even though you are entertaining a heterosexual fanatasy. I admire a straight guy like Byron who is at least honest unlike a lot of other escorts about what he's doing instead of lying like some do to make you believe they are more into guys than they really are and are "bisexual". He's so nice though a lot of hardcore johns are going to chew him up which is why I think he should stick to modelling and stripping.

[Guest bluboy]

Just a heads up on this guy. I had also asked around about him and heard from 3 different sources that he was a ripoff who basically promised and did not deliver and took calls during the session. So the word on the street out there on this guy is at best mixed. Based on what I had heard I did not pursue. 2 of the sources I had were very reliable and 1 other source was himself reliable but he had heard from somone else- who i do not know if that other person was reliable. Blu

[Guest Esc_Tracker]

At the risk of highjacking this thread, what is it with otherwise perfectly reasonable and affectionate escorts who answer cellphones in the middle of a "call"? The first time this hapenned to me, I just assumed the escort had forgotten to turn his cell off, but this seems to be a common practice. What's with these guys? Don't they realize just how annoying this can be? It certainly blows the "I'm paying, but he's still really into it" fantasy to smithereens. Oo, I could just... ("hissy" fit censored) x(

 

Esc-Tracker

[Guest Fin Fang Foom]

>If you are a gay man

>like Richard Simmons and a

>woman pays you to spend

>an evening with her and

>then undresses and touches you,

>you are still a gay

>man even though you are

>entertaining a heterosexual fanatasy.

 

 

Ewwwwwwww. Could you have picked a slightly more appetizing image?

[Justice]

LAST EDITED ON Apr-05-01 AT 10:28PM (EST)[p]I agree! Richard Simmons! I almost tossed my cookies!

[ready4boi]

Ok make that Eminem instead. LOL.