Michael #2 in LA

[StillLovely]

Does anyone else find it odd that every reviewer for Michael #2 in LA writes in the same style of run-on sentences? Every reviewer also seems to rave on and on (and on) about the same things. And to add further sameness to the reviews, they're all written by white guys in their 40's and 50's. Check out the reviews and decide for yourself.

[Guest sfmikeyo]

I can't really comment on the sameness of Michael's reviews, but I can comment on him personally. We were in a six-month long distance relationship before he began escorting. Michael's a very sweet guy and is incredible in bed. He exudes sexual energy and has a topping technique that can't be beat. If he approaches his professional encounters with anywhere near the same passion, skill and intensity as he did while we were together, you won't be disappointed.

[J-Man]

Hey... guess what? There's ANOTHER one--- same writing style, same comments....

 

Is there anyone here who can say they've actually BEEN with the guy (as an escort?)