Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

stay on topic rather than critique 

45 minutes ago, musclvr said:

He should put his pictures in chronological order based on the accumulation of tatoos.

 

Posted

Not a critique. An observation. The accumulation of tattoos on his body are indicative of some out of date pictures, from no tats to arm tats to a chest tat. You don't accumulate that many tats without a passage of a good amount of time. It's a rare instance of us, as consumers, being able to ID the more recent vs. the more dated pictures.

Posted (edited)

 

On 8/3/2024 at 11:42 AM, musclvr said:

Not a critique. An observation. The accumulation of tattoos on his body are indicative of some out of date pictures, from no tats to arm tats to a chest tat. You don't accumulate that many tats without a passage of a good amount of time. It's a rare instance of us, as consumers, being able to ID the more recent vs. the more dated pictures.

A critique of his photo positioning is not a review of an experience with him which is the premise of the post.  I think ANYONE can see the variance in tattoos.  Too often is the site littered with irrelevant and sometime catty opinions of providers.  Maybe look for posts that have a subject line "WHAT DO YOU THINK OF HIS PHOTOS?"

Edited by KevinHere
  • 10 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...