Truth in reviews...or here we go again!

[Guest SizeFreak]

Couldn't agree with you more, DickHo!

 

But it's a lost cause, buddy, and has been for a while. Things have gotten so wackily devaluated that not even PHOTOS can separate the men from the boys. You see ads all the time with guys flaunting 5 1/2" hardons, and right UNDER it, a text that says it's a thick ten-incher. Hello?

 

That guy, Tom, whose URL I posted in the Strictly Trade thread just now--he had no idea of his cock size in inches. He just knew he was very big, and he let the Rentboy guys fill in the details.

'A fat uncut near-9-incher' is literally accurate (i.e. huge), but most escorts who could boast a cock like that would be advertising 11" or more.

[Guest DickHo]

Today there is a new review of Jason Rhodes. This review and the previous review say he has a nine incher. Jason himself says he is 7" (see his site). I've been with Jason and 7" inches is generous.

 

Please guys, either use a ruler or say nothing.

[Guest bashfull]

Just an observation, the two reviews you referenced are identical. It appears the same review was posted twice.