Jump to content

Twink bttm boi 2 Watch Older Top in SF


bttmvoyurrtwink
This topic is 6287 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dont know if this is the right section

but i would love to watch an older top hire another young twink

voyeuristic here and would LOVE to watch

could take pics/vids for you

 

19 5'5'' 120 white here

can give more info

 

if you are ever visting san francisco let me know

Posted

NCM2169 is your man!

 

Although he's an active charter member of NAMBLA, he generally prefers boys much younger. Please beware, however, that NCM2169 has been known for "thugging out" and not tipping. There is an entire thread specifically dedicated to NCM's "thuggish" behavior entitled "A Thug Amongst Us" which showcases NCM's minority viewpoints and grandiose ego.

 

I think you'll be okay as long as you don't identify yourself as Catholic, as this could send NCM2169 into a lunatic fringe. Just tell NCM you're an atheist and he will likely cream his pants in no time.

 

Good luck.

Posted

No, no - it is TurdBlossomLover you want as the top!

Self described as:

I'm 34, 6'4, 350 pounds, size 16 shoes

He loves to bareback and get stool on his tool & shit on his shirt!

Guest ncm2169
Posted

bttmvoyurrtwink, it is once again necessary for a responsible poster on the Message Board to clean up after the flatulent garbage spewed by a poster who exists only to cause mischief and sow dissension within this online community.

 

For the record, I am not an "active" member of NAMBLA, nor am I a "Charter Member" of NAMBLA, nor have I had ANY association or connection with that organization of perverted pedophiles. Furthermore, I do not have any sexual preferences for boys any age under 18, indeed, I generally am not into twinks of any age. Besides my lack of interest in "chicken", I do not wish to have any "Authorities" inquiring about my sexual proclivities. (I'll leave all that to TwinkBoyLover and his own NAMBLA Fellow Travelers).

 

So, while TwinkBoyLover deliberately sent you on a wild goose chase when he could have been helpful to your request, I apologize for his behavior in this online community. Maybe someday he'll grow up and be responsible and mature, but I wouldn't hold my breath. Some people just love to do nothing but stir the pot in hopes of creating a witches' brew.

 

Getting back to your original question, I DO have a suggestion. TwinkBoyLover recently said this in a post: "I'm 34, 6'4" tall, 330 pounds, size 16 shoes, 44" waist, 52" chest, with a large beer belly. Twinks love me." I suggest you invite TBL to your soiree and see how many SF-based twinks who are interested, not to mention those who will fly in on their own ticket, just to be savored by this master of Twink Sex.

 

If you go that route, please do report back and let us know how things went.

 

Finally, as for TBL's references to Catholics, despite his slavish obeisance to that theology, he constantly refuses to answer my questions which I pose here again for the umpteenth time: (1) if Jesus were a twink here on earth today, would you suck his cock? Would you fuck him? and (2) How do you feel about a Priest who pays a male escort to fuck him (the Priest) in his Rectory?" }(

Guest ncm2169
Posted

Forgive a crude mental picture here. A 330 pound beast is about to stick his tongue into the ass of a twink, who we should probably assume weighs less than 150 lbs. (Forget about any fucking, the tongue comes first). Does anyone here really believe that this scene occurs with any regularity?

 

Second question: Should the twink bottom charge extra by the pound of the top? (It seems that bottoms sometimes charge by the size of the top's cock - not by the weight of the top). What's the ... you'll pardon the expression in this case ... extra poundage multiplied by the thickness of the top?

 

Ah, escorts have so many mathematical challenges ... }(

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...