Jump to content
This topic is 2121 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just wanted to confirm, and perhaps inform the unaware, of some rentmen features which assist escorts, fake or otherwise, in ripping clients off, which I've recently become aware.

 

1. When asking a heretofore unseen provider to unlock, a "you can only ask once" reply indicates the scammer is able to change anything & everything while appearing credible due to longevity, and of course, positive reviews.

 

2. To avoid a bad review, an advertiser who rips you off, merely needs to block you, before you are able.

 

Not only does that add insult to injury, but doesn't that mean they have contempt for their target audience?

 

Despite email exchanges clearly showing the beginnings of an engagement?

 

Why would anyone support that or them?

 

Also, doesn't having the same city lookup feature mean they probably own the competition?

 

Any vc's want to steal their business?

Posted
Just wanted to confirm, and perhaps inform the unaware, of some rentmen features which assist escorts, fake or otherwise, in ripping clients off, which I've recently become aware.

 

1. When asking a heretofore unseen provider to unlock, a "you can only ask once" reply indicates the scammer is able to change anything & everything while appearing credible due to longevity, and of course, positive reviews.

 

2. To avoid a bad review, an advertiser who rips you off, merely needs to block you, before you are able.

 

Not only does that add insult to injury, but doesn't that mean they have contempt for their target audience?

 

Despite email exchanges clearly showing the beginnings of an engagement?

 

Why would anyone support that or them?

 

Also, doesn't having the same city lookup feature mean they probably own the competition?

 

Any vc's want to steal their business?

 

Thanks for the tips

 

Just kidding. Sorry if you’ve been burned.

 

I don’t quite comprehend the second half of this post

Posted
Just wanted to confirm, and perhaps inform the unaware, of some rentmen features which assist escorts, fake or otherwise, in ripping clients off, which I've recently become aware.

 

1. When asking a heretofore unseen provider to unlock, a "you can only ask once" reply indicates the scammer is able to change anything & everything while appearing credible due to longevity, and of course, positive reviews.

 

2. To avoid a bad review, an advertiser who rips you off, merely needs to block you, before you are able.

 

Not only does that add insult to injury, but doesn't that mean they have contempt for their target audience?

 

Despite email exchanges clearly showing the beginnings of an engagement?

 

Why would anyone support that or them?

 

Also, doesn't having the same city lookup feature mean they probably own the competition?

 

Any vc's want to steal their business?

 

We (clients) are not their (rentmen's) audience. Escorts/masseurs are their audience as they are the ones who pay rentmen. RM is a platform for providers to advertise their services/availability, not a site to screen out escorts you consider rip offs. I've read a number of posts on this forum that recount "reporting" escorts to RM. Generally, the "reports" that result in RM action against an advertiser are those where advertiser A uses pictures from another advertiser B. Thus, RM acts to protect its more reliable advertisers. There are other means to screen escorts (these forums, the review site (Daddy's)), general reputation of established escorts, etc. Ultimately, however, escorting and hiring them occupies a gray space because of legalities. Much like unregulated drugs or supplements, you can't rely on any watchdog agency to vet the service/product as you could if it was legal and regulated.

Posted
We (clients) are not their (rentmen's) audience. Escorts/masseurs are their audience as they are the ones who pay rentmen. ...

 

I think you mean clients are not RM's customers. The escorts/masseurs are their customers as they pay for the ads. Clients, on the other hand, are the audience. That is, they consume the content.

Posted
I think you mean clients are not RM's customers. The escorts/masseurs are their customers as they pay for the ads. Clients, on the other hand, are the audience. That is, they consume the content.

 

I meant "audience" in the sense that RM is not soliciting business from clients. If it helps to substitute the word "customers" for "audience", I'm fine with that.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...