What's this, another FinFangFoom fart?

[Guest alanm]

>I know my commenting on private emails from MC members will

>drive 69 madder than she already is, which explains why I

>enjoy doing it. Once again, thanks to those who wrote me about

>this thread, especially the members and escorts who agree with

>my position (now bend over). I urge you to write Daddy and

>encourage him to consider refining certain board rules. It

>makes sense, the new server and all. :-)

 

I do not remember anyone ever commenting on your private e-mail, let alone getting upset about them.

[RockHard]

"I do not remember anyone ever commenting on your private e-mail"

 

I suspect many readers don't store memories of every dig and insult that has been thrown my way. There are far too many to keep track of and I have no intention of testing anyone. But, when some lame-ass, rude, trouble-making mother-fucker has the audacity to suggest or insinuate that I'm a liar, without knowing any truth, I don't forget.

 

The term "madder" in this context refers to "insane," not "anger" or getting "upset."

[Guest PWIT]

>.... I thought I'd offer this going-away

>gift, a retouched pic of Fin's favorite escort, Foxx. I made

>Foxx look as though he is inching his way toward Mandingo

>status.

>

>http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1436/1045720159_46a28d570a_o.jpg

>

 

when you figure out how to make that happen for real please let me know so I can sign up :+

[seattlebottom]

What a racist comment you posted on here. With all the wealth that you claim to have, I beg you to please buy yourself some class.

[Guest PWIT]

>What a racist comment you posted on here. With all the

>wealth that you claim to have, I beg you to please buy

>yourself some class.

 

I didn't catch the racist comment. Were you talking about the reference to Mandingo - the late 90's porn star with the foot long cock?

[RockHard]

RE: What's this, another idiot?

 

"What a racist comment you posted on here. With all the wealth that you claim to have, I beg you to please buy yourself some class."

 

What an absolutely rude and ignorant statement, seattlebottom. With only 84 posts, your future here looks disappointing. "Bottom" members with brains up their asses are simply too common.

 

Furthermore, I refuse to take "class" lessons from a know-nothing, knee-jerk reactionary. Anyone with class knows one CANNOT buy class. (I beg you to try buying some brains, though).

 

If the name Mandingo is what set you off, then I refer you to Justin Slayer's 2006 film, "Dingo."

http://www.evilangel.com/page.php?node=item&item_id=1763

 

If you can tolerate the sight of pussy being hammered by huge cocks (I doubt it so have your barf bag ready), the Evil Angel website offers some of the best previews in the business. Click on Mandingo's name and his films appear, a treat for every bona fide size queen.

 

To my knowledge, Black porn star, Mandingo, is an Evil Angel exclusive and appears in recent films as late as 2005. He is the porn star "insider" reference I made above, in the Foxx post. Clearly, seattlebottom, you're on the outside.

 

I do not know this actor's history or how he came to be named Mandingo. Porn names are recycled all the time. To me, he looks youngish and relatively new to the scene. But Black skin has a tendency to age well and I don't pay enough attention to porn to know all the details.

[RockHard]

RE: What's this, Mandingo in action?

 

Photo removed.

 

Jules Jordan, one of my favorite straight porn actors, may have provided my first exposure to the current Mandingo. Jordan was producing videos for Evil Angel but now I believe he's on his own. The above photo is from Jules Jordan's website. Mandingo works a lot for Donnie Darko, who directs for Evil Angel.

 

Mandingo is no Photoshop creation. They say his cock is 14 inches and the industry claims he has one of the biggest dicks in porn. In every film I've seen thus far, this guy seems to have no problem getting rock hard. As far as faces go, I've seen much worse.

 

Big dicks don't do much for me, sexually, but I know how they tickle Fin's G-spot, that's why I dropped this "little" insider tidbit. :-)

[RockHard]

RE: What's this, Mandingo in action? I guess not.

 

Sorry about that folks. I forgot, no erections.

 

For those who missed the pic, check the links or Google-n-KY away! :-)

[+ deej]

RE: What's this, Mandingo in action? I guess not.

 

The erection was enough to disqualify it, but the blowjob put it way beyond the realm of acceptability.

 

You're smart enough to know that, or so you claim. Please start proving it.

 

"I forgot" is a lame and unacceptable excuse. If memory is a problem for you, we can cure our part of the problem.

[RockHard]

RE: What's this, deej in action? Sour as ever.

 

"You're smart enough to know that, or so you claim. Please start proving it."

 

I feel no desire to prove anything to you, deej, even though I could prove that you've written me privately from two different email accounts (one was anonymous)...attempting to speak as two different people, perhaps?

 

Furthermore, intelligence has nothing to do with forgetfulness.

 

""I forgot" is a lame and unacceptable excuse."

 

But it happens to be the truth and I frankly don't care what you deem unacceptable. Considering your extant "tude," you have some nerve playing judge. Tell me, deej, does the "tude" make you feel powerful?

 

Given the millions upon millions of erection photos freely available on the internet today, given the hundreds and hundreds of erection photos supplied yearly by escorts who advertise on the web, given the fact that this MC caters exclusively to men who thoroughly enjoy the sight of a good, solid erection, and given this fairly recent article, "U.S. Judge Blocks 1998 Online Porn Law," it's VERY EASY TO FORGET that some websites still fear 18 USC 2257.

 

I don't blame Daddy for exercising caution. I respect prudent business decisions, which explains why I apologized. I blame you, deej, for the "tude." A kinder gentleman would have accepted the apology and spared us the sour notes and judgments.

 

Here is a link to the article:

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/WireStory?id=2972555&page=2

 

And a few quotes:

 

"The never-enforced law was Congress' second attempt to protect children from online porn. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld in 2004 a temporary injunction blocking the law from taking effect; Reed on Thursday issued a permanent injunction."

 

"Reed noted in his 83-page ruling that, since 2000, the Justice Department has initiated fewer than 20 prosecutions for obscenity that did not also involve other charges such as child pornography or attempts to have sex with minors."

[Guest alanm]

RE: What's this, Mandingo in action? I guess not.

 

>The erection was enough to disqualify it, but the blowjob put

>it way beyond the realm of acceptability.

>

>You're smart enough to know that, or so you claim. Please

>start proving it.

>

>"I forgot" is a lame and unacceptable excuse. If memory is a

>problem for you, we can cure our part of the problem.

 

 

The only reason the word 'smart' is even slightly associated with RockHard is because he keeps telling us how smart he is.

[RockHard]

What's this, alanm lookin for signs of intelligence?

 

Over 800 posts and continuing, I don't believe I've ever mentioned the term I.Q. I'll show you mine if you show me yours. :-)

 

What's the matter, alanm, the arthritis acting up again? Having difficulty getting a good night's rest? I know someone who can read you Michel Foucault bedtime stories, if that's your preferred inclination. Or how about that Mandingo link I offered? Big Black dick not your thing? Should I send you my black and white nudes of Steve Sandvoss? I'll bet that'll put a smile on your worn-torn face and ease the pain.

 

I do admit I spend too much time pointing out the stupid statements from others. Maybe, just maybe, that gives some people the wrong impression. I'm sure glad I don't come here looking for love. :-(

[Guest EuropTravl]

RE: What's this, alanm lookin for signs of intelligence?

 

>>""You're smart enough to know that, or so you claim. Please start proving it."

 

>>I feel no desire to prove anything to you, deej..."

 

My, I know two old bitties who REALLY miss their F. F. Foom!

 

(Go ahead, continue to deny and mask the pain. We see through it.)

 

 

[+ deej]

It's Rockhard being a fool again.

 

>"You're smart enough to know that, or so

>you claim. Please start proving it."

>

>I feel no desire to prove anything to you, deej, even though I

>could prove that you've written me privately from two

>different email accounts (one was anonymous)...attempting to

>speak as two different people, perhaps?

 

::chuckle::

 

Making up stories only makes you look desperate.

 

>But it happens to be the truth and I frankly don't care what

>you deem unacceptable.

 

Careful, sweetie, open contempt for the rules of conduct here is actually covered in the rules and can get a girl banned.

 

>Given ..... this fairly recent article, "U.S.

>Judge Blocks 1998 Online Porn Law," it's VERY EASY TO FORGET

>that some websites still fear 18 USC 2257.

 

Given that the article you cite discusses COPA, not 2257, it's very easy to conclude you don't know what you're talking about. Then again, you did have to read the WHOLE article to find out it was about COPA. The article doesn't say WHICH law was overturned until the 2nd page.

 

This site has been COPA-compliant since the beginning. COPA was a completely toothless law requiring that adult sites be filterable. The 2257 battle, which restricts content, is still ongoing and Atty. General Gonzalez has recently reinforced his intent to move forward on their intended path.

[RockHard]

RE: What's this, deej in action? Rude as ever.

 

"Making up stories only makes you look desperate."

 

I expected as much from you, deej. Disappointing. I may add a pinch of color or a teaspoon of heat but I don't make up stories. Feel free to call other members a liar and let's see who gets banned, sweetie. Anyway, I have the proof.

 

Not caring what you say or think is hardly "open contempt for the rules of conduct here." If Daddy bans me for slapping your rude mouth, then so be it. Unlike Fin, I won't return (or announce it, either).

 

"Given that the article you cite discusses COPA, not 2257, it's very easy to conclude you don't know what you're talking about"

 

Not so fast, hussy. That was a test and my chuckle is on you.

[+ deej]

RE: What's this, deej in action? Rude as ever.

 

>I have the proof.

 

Post it.

 

You can't and won't because you don't have it. It does not exist.

 

You are telling a lie.

[Guest zipperzone]

RE: What's this, deej in action? Rude as ever.

 

>If Daddy bans me for slapping your

>rude mouth, then so be it. Unlike Fin, I won't return (or

>announce it, either).

 

Oh My God - there really is a Santa Claus

[RockHard]

RE: What's this, deej in denial? And rude as ever.

 

"You can't and won't because you don't have it."

 

I CAN and won't because it's not worth the possibility of hurting someone else in the process. I could send the emails to Daddy and I assume he could analyze the data and come to the same conclusion but I have more respect for Daddy's time. Frankly, deej, proving you wrong is not worth any effort.

 

"You are telling a lie."

 

No I'm not.

[+ deej]

RE: What's this, deej in denial? And rude as ever.

 

>"You can't and won't because you don't

>have it."

>

>I CAN and won't because it's not worth the possibility of

>hurting someone else in the process. I could send the emails

>to Daddy and I assume he could analyze the data and come to

>the same conclusion but I have more respect for Daddy's time.

>Frankly, deej, proving you wrong is not worth any effort.

 

Utter bullshit. You cannot prove me wrong because I am not wrong.

 

You made the accusation. You claim to have proof.

 

Produce it. Cough it up.

 

I give you permission to produce proof that I've done what you said. "Hurting someone" is a bullshit excuse to back out of providing what you do not have.

 

It wouldn't be the first time Daddy has examined my entire email repository (with my full permission).

 

Put up or shut up. You have the proof you claim or you do not. I say you do not. Only you can prove that you are not telling a lie.

[RockHard]

RE: What's this, deej in denial? And rude as ever.

 

"Put up or shut up. I give you permission (with my full permission)"

 

Save it for your next purchase of Cole Ramsey, sweetie. Like I said, you're not worth it.

[+ deej]

RE: What's this, deej in denial? And rude as ever.

 

>"Put up or shut up. I give you permission

>(with my full permission)"

>

>Save it for your next purchase of Cole Ramsey, sweetie. Like I

>said, you're not worth it.

 

So in other words, you are unable to back up your claims.

 

You're not worth it either. TTFN.

[swallowU]

RE: What's this, deej in denial? And rude as ever.

 

I hope that means deej that you've given us a break from him for a brief period of time...