Jump to content

AustinWolf 4myfans


Rvarghcrna
This topic is 1756 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

I am not an AW fan at all and agree with many of the comments previousky, however the video was consensual and the Flight Attendant knew he was being recorded.

 

(AW is still gross tho} ?

 

 

Did you read the news article at the provided link in my post?

 

It specifically stated that the male flight attendant did NOT know he was being videotaped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

But did the flight attendant agree to having it put on public media with his face or other identifying information present?

 

Gman

 

Dunno. I cannot attest he did, as you can't attest he didn't. I can see he knew the video was being taken and was a willing participant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you read the news article at the provided link in my post?

 

It specifically stated that the male flight attendant did NOT know he was being videotaped.

 

Watch the video. He clearly knows the iPhone camera is there. AW adjusts it several times, you can hear him talking about it. He said it to save his job. It's shocking someone would get caught on film and then deny it, I know.

 

AGAIN I'm not defending AW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watch the video. He clearly knows the iPhone camera is there. AW adjusts it several times, you can hear him talking about it. He said it to save his job. It's shocking someone would get caught on film and then deny it, I know.

 

AGAIN I'm not defending AW.

 

 

Thanks for your response.

 

How do I watch the video? I do not see a link on the article that reported the event.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://thisvid.com/videos/wolf-austin-and-the-delta-flight-attendant/

 

Just google Austin wolf delta and you can find part 2

 

I watch Austin Wolfs 4myfans and enjoy it it.....I like when he holds their carotid when he tops them and they pass out and seem to love it.

 

Chalk it up to my pleasure in pornstars behaving badly.....I am counting down the days for Teofilo Brank to be released.

 

Only god can judge me.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting the link to the video.

 

I knew only that the flight attendant said he did not know he was being recorded. The film clearly disputes his false claim.

 

As is said, "a picture paints a thousand words" which leaves no credibility for the flight attendant to claim lack of knowledge in connection with the video.

 

However, it is possible the flight attendant did not know that the video would be sent out on social media.

 

That escapade on the flight was quite expensive for the flight attendant in that he lost his job over it.

 

That was a severe penalty. Had the flight attendant not been in uniform in the video, he might not have been fired by Delta Airlines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being filmed and giving written permission to distribute are two very different things.

 

If I were that fired flight attendant, I'd have sued the living shit out of AW.

 

 

Given the facts and circumstances of the matter, it appears that Austin Wolf is a mean-spirited individual who had no concern for the flight attendant or the potential of losing his job by posting the video to social media.

 

It is very costly to sue. Most likely, the former flight attendant would not have the resources to sue Austin Wolf.

 

Moreover, it is unlikely an attorney would take the potential lawsuit on a contingency basis.

 

Bad lesson learned by the former flight attendant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the facts and circumstances of the matter, it appears that Austin Wolf is a mean-spirited individual who had no concern for the flight attendant or the potential of losing his job by posting the video to social media.

 

It is very costly to sue. Most likely, the former flight attendant would not have the resources to sue Austin Wolf.

 

Moreover, it is unlikely an attorney would take the potential lawsuit on a contingency basis.

 

Bad lesson learned by the former flight attendant.

 

AW was perhaps cunning enough to fuck over someone he knew couldn't fight back. It speaks volumes.

 

All the way around, it was a distasteful situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AW is so amazingly handsome and has such a fabulous body -- if only he were well hung he'd be the ultimate gay porn star. For a uber top, it's a bit of a handicap not to be at least better than average hung. I think he tries to make up for it with the choking and aggressivity. Personally, I think he should do some bottoming to revive interest in his porn persona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of people don't have the impulsive need to steal from content creators.

 

Unfortunately it's a cat and mouse game since Napster did the same to the music industry.

 

He was on Grindr last week in nyc and was open for business.

 

It was a scam... Grindr is full of fake profiles using pics of pornstars and asking for verification later on a different page asking for CC information, etc. We've talked and warned others on here about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the video was consensual and the Flight Attendant knew he was being recorded

After viewing the video, no reasonable person could conclude that the flight attendant did not know he was being recorded. Whether he knew the video would be posted on the internet is another story.

 

My question is, did the flight attendant know that he would be kissing his career in the airline industry goodbye? Isn't this the perfect example of a gay guy thinking with the brain in his cock as opposed to the one in his head? What are the chances that anyone in the airline industry would ever hire him again?

 

Sue Austin Wolf? I suppose that is an option. If no contract exists between AW and flight attendant to post the video on the internet, it seems to me a case could be made. Flight attendant would need to find a good lawyer and be able to afford the retainer. How much money could he and his lawyer hope to get? How deep are AW's pockets? Does AW have assets? Could he lose his home, car, etc., assuming he owns any?

 

No matter what, it seems on the surface that AW fucked the flight attendant real good. A fair question, what was AW's motive in posting the video? Unless the flight attendant wanted it public, AW looks like a horse's ass.

Edited by rogerG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between this and posting clients pictures that slighted him I thought everyone knew this by now. I think people love his selfish narcissism thing.

 

That whole episode with posting client pictures/info was telling of some dark crap that is best avoided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummm perhaps you aren’t aware that he does.

I doubt that Kurtis would say this without knowing what he is talking about, and as far as I can tell he knows Mr Wolf and would be able to ask him. Of course, I don't know, so I am speculating, but I don't characterise my speculation as fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given that it's pretty clear the flight attendant was aware he was being recorded, unless he had some sort of promise from AW that the video wouldn't be shared, a court would probably presume that he realized it could be shared and either implicitly consented or proceeded at his own risk. He didn't need to give written permission. It is unlikely he could pursue a claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given that it's pretty clear the flight attendant was aware he was being recorded, unless he had some sort of promise from AW that the video wouldn't be shared, a court would probably presume that he realized it could be shared and either implicitly consented or proceeded at his own risk. He didn't need to give written permission. It is unlikely he could pursue a claim.

 

If AW profited off the clip, then yes, Houston, we (might) have a problem.

 

Implicit consent all relies on where the case would tried. This is totally jurisdictional. I believe 40 of 50 states are 1-party consent states. California however is an all-party state. CA Penal Code 632 says:

 

© For the purposes of this section, “confidential communication” means any communication carried on in circumstances as may reasonably indicate that any party to the communication desires it to be confined to the parties thereto, but excludes a communication made in a public gathering or in any legislative, judicial, executive, or administrative proceeding open to the public, or in any other circumstance in which the parties to the communication may reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded.

 

The only real way to take an educated guess on this is to see what the courts have previously done in all-party jurisdictions.

 

 

Edit: I mention CA because I thought I read somewhere that the plane was flying out of LAX. I'm sure that it happened in the air would make it even more difficult to figure things out.

Edited by Benjamin_Nicholas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is 1756 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...