Benjamin Nicholas' beautiful COCK!

[Guest roadhoundnyc]

hmmmmmm. might that have been on purpose? nah, couldn't be a comment on what trash this kid is...could it?

[RockHard]

RE: MORE COCK!

 

This image was one of Benjamin's most provocative. Unfortunately, the quality of the image on his website is poor (too many specular highlights=zero data) and someone placed ugly black dots over his sexy hard-on. Also, his asshole was void of any detail data. This is a favorite pose because it's so inviting to my tongue. In order to bring the sex back into the image, I had to find just the right stand-in model to give me cock and ass. So, I posed for a self-portrait and used my own cock and ass-crack for this photo. I think it turned out better than expected. :-)

 

Photoshop is such a wonderful program and I thought this image of Benjamin could serve as a fun example of what Photoshop can do with an artistic hand at the controls. None of the following samples utilize Photoshop's default settings. I customized the settings for each image to my liking. Therefore, these are signed originals and it is illegal to copy them. Thank you.

 

Benjamin Nicholas is entitled to use these as he sees fit. They are my gift to him.

 

 

This is a subtle pencil rendering of the image. Much of the detail remains while the impact is slightly more artistic.

 

 

I love this charcoal on canvas effect, taking the image to another artistic level.

 

 

If Benjamin would have a square on Hollywood Boulevard, I think this should be the version. The image translates well into this chiseled-out-of-cement style.

 

 

For modern-art wacky, I thought this style worked. It's the least x-rated, so Republican families can bring the kids to the viewing. :-)

 

 

And for the disco-queens, there's nothing quite like neon.

 

Feel free to express which is your favorite version and why. I would appreciate the comments. The hateful trolls can keep their traps shut and go fuck themselves. :-)

 

I sure hope Tom Isern doesn't plan on ever calling me a troll again. I may not be able to resist showing you all what I've done to one of his pics.

 

Oh, yeah, that little ditty about me posing for the stand-in cock-n-ass...I was kidding. Too bad it's too early to whisper April Fools.

[tazmanian5230]

RE: MORE COCK!

 

Rockhard,

All of your hott picsof BN make me just want to hire him today !!!

Keepm cummin !!

[RockHard]

Borrowed COCK.

 

Since no one guessed, here are the borrowed COCKS:

 

 

1st Benjamin Image: I know I said he was famous but I can't remember his name and I misplaced my notes. I'm sure someone knows who this working guy is. I think he's hot. LOVE those tits.

 

 

2nd Benjamin Image: It was difficult finding a color match to BN's jeans and since I didn't have much time for searching, I settled on Marco Mederos because this photo has always made me want to drop to my knees.

 

 

3rd Benjamin Image: Finding an image with similar body language takes time. Thank goodness for GayBeef. There's something for everyone there and I managed to make this image work.

 

Thanks to everyone who wrote me privately. This was a fun fantasy thread and I enjoyed working on it. Thanks to FinFangFoom for motivating me to show a sexier side of Photoshop to the boys on the MC. But most of all, I wish to thank Benjamin Nicholas, who, in spite of being less than a perfect human being, is a true sexy, sweetheart with a great sense of humor and a very generous personality. Benjamin, you make a terrific muse and you are always welcome on my desktop. :-)

[FinFangFoom]

RE: Borrowed COCK.

 

>Since no one guessed

 

For people to guess, they would first have to care.

 

 

 

>Thanks to everyone who wrote me privately.

 

So, people were writing you privately (since this post SCREAMED "privacy") but not a single one of them made a guess.

 

 

 

Someone get a cyber-shovel - this thread is attracting flies.

 

Aromatically yours,

 

FFF

[+ Lucky]

Rock Hard, could you get your tongue any further up Benjamin's ass?

 

http://www.africancrisis.org/images/Robert_Mugabe_Toilet_Paper_Lick_My_Bum_4.jpg

[Guest PWIT]

RE: Borrowed COCK.

 

>Someone get a cyber-shovel - this thread is attracting flies.

 

Yes, FFF, after reading your post I believe it is! You really made that too easy.

[RockHard]

RE: Borrowed COCK.

 

"not a single one of them made a guess"

 

Not a single one made a "correct" guess.

 

"this thread is attracting flies"

 

Spoken like a true pile of shit.

 

Geez, Fin, at least I thanked you for providing motivation. What an ungrateful sow. Must you always prove to everyone that you are (freezing) cold and heartless?

 

Maybe if you spent less time playing in manure, you might do some research and figure out the new rules for posting pics on the internet. Talk about NOT CARING: a thread with blocked images is a complete waste of time.

 

Thanks for nothing, pal.

[RockHard]

RE: Lucky COCK!

 

"Rock Hard, could you get your tongue any further up Benjamin's ass?"

 

On this one, Lucky, my tongue is firmly up Benjamin's ass and I'm enjoying every lick, dart and swirl. Ooops...I think I'm...CUMMMMMMMING! YAHOOOOOO!

 

Benjamin makes a terrific muse and every artist must have at least one. (No pun to the current spate of Edie Sedgwick revivals.)

 

Other, more insecure escorts might have freaked-out by seeing their image on the internet with a fake cock attached. Benjamin did not.

 

Other, more naive escorts might have tried to lecture me on the evils of men who lurk and steal from the web with every intention to DESTROY, DEMEAN and DEBUNK. Benjamin did not. (As if anyone needs to remind Benjamin he has haters out to get him. Oh, did I mention the images have expertly concealed watermarks, capable of being traced regardless of renaming software? Technology is improving.)

 

Other, more banshee-style valley-girl escorts might have tried to scream their way through some hypocritical, platitudinal I-don't-show-my-cock-so-that-makes-my-throne-higher bullshit, while they wabbled-away on broken Prada high-heels, yelling in a high-pitch girlie-voice, "BLOCK, BLOCK, BLOCK!" Benjamin did not. (Unless you're into twinks, who gives a fuck about escorts who act like whining cry-babies?)

 

I suspect Benjamin Nicholas knew this thread "had a heart" and he enjoyed my attempt at disrobing it. My gratitude to Benjamin for being a GREAT SPORT and possessing a TERRIFIC PERSONALITY is sincere. Other, less-fun, more self-absorbed escorts could have given me a lot of private shit for creating this thread. Benjamin did not, and I thank him, again.

 

Thank you all for reading my posts.

 

ps I can't help but wonder, of all the men who enjoy pointing a finger at Benjamin Nicholas, calling him a liar and a cheat, how many of them have cheated on their income-tax statements? We all pick our issues and positions, don't we?

[FinFangFoom]

RE: Lucky COCK!

 

>Benjamin makes a terrific muse and every artist must have at

>least one. (No pun to the current spate of Edie Sedgwick

>revivals.)

>

>Other, more insecure escorts might have freaked-out by seeing

>their image on the internet with a fake cock attached.

>Benjamin did not.

>

>Other, more naive escorts might have tried to lecture me on

>the evils of men who lurk and steal from the web with every

>intention to DESTROY, DEMEAN and DEBUNK. Benjamin did not. (As

>if anyone needs to remind Benjamin he has haters out to

>get him. Oh, did I mention the images have expertly concealed

>watermarks, capable of being traced regardless of renaming

>software? Technology is improving.)

>

>Other, more banshee-style valley-girl escorts might have tried

>to scream their way through some hypocritical, platitudinal

>I-don't-show-my-cock-so-that-makes-my-throne-higher bullshit,

>while they wabbled-away on broken Prada high-heels, yelling in

>a high-pitch girlie-voice, "BLOCK, BLOCK, BLOCK!" Benjamin did

>not. (Unless you're into twinks, who gives a fuck about

>escorts who act like whining cry-babies?)

>

>I suspect Benjamin Nicholas knew this thread "had a heart" and

>he enjoyed my attempt at disrobing it. My gratitude to

>Benjamin for being a GREAT SPORT and possessing a TERRIFIC

>PERSONALITY is sincere. Other, less-fun, more self-absorbed

>escorts could have given me a lot of private shit for creating

>this thread. Benjamin did not, and I thank him, again.

 

 

 

It's official: you're deranged.

 

 

>ps I can't help but wonder, of all the men who enjoy pointing

>a finger at Benjamin Nicholas, calling him a liar and a cheat,

>how many of them have cheated on their income-tax statements?

>We all pick our issues and positions, don't we?

 

 

The lamest of all possible arguements for misbehavior. With that (il)logic, we should excuse everything because no one is perfect. In your world, we'd have anarchy.

 

"Yes your honor, I know I murdered four people, but Jeffrey Dahmer murdered seventeen!"

 

Logically yours,

 

FFF

[RockHard]

RE: Fin COCK-n-bull!

 

"It's official: you're deranged."

 

It's more fun to be deranged than to be heartless. :9

 

"With that (il)logic, we should excuse everything because no one is perfect."

 

I didn't call for anyone to "excuse" anything. Benjamin Nicholas will pay for his mistakes regardless of my opinion of his hate-tank, stone-throwers.

 

Comparing an escort-blog's plagiarism to murder and the illness of Jeffrey Dahmer is "the LAMEST OF ALL POSSIBLE ARGUMENTS (spelled correctly)."

 

Fin, dear, climb out from the shit. The flies, they are a feastin'.

[+ Tom Isern]

RE: MORE COCK!

 

ROCKHEAD: "I sure hope Tom Isern doesn't plan on ever calling me a troll again."

 

Dear Rockhead,

I would never call you a troll again. Trolls are common. Indeed, you recently posted a taxonomy of the different types of trolls:

 

1. The Irritating Troll

2. The Destructive Troll

3. The Nasty Troll

4. The Evil and Illegal Troll

5. The Drivel Troll

6. The Crosspost Troll

7. The Request for Assistance Troll

8. The Personal Attack Troll

9. The Bullying Troll

10. The "Free Speech" Troll

 

You can never be reduced to one of these trimly defined and tightly delineated categories. You have fire and wind and girth and range. To ascribe only one of these categories to you would be like calling Jesus a sermonizer, Plato a dreamer, Shakespeare a writer, Mozart an entertainer… You thoroughly transcend any of these reductive taxonomies.

 

Rockhead, you are no troll. I suspect you are either an Uruk-hai or an Orc. Perhaps the members of the board can vote on which is the better descriptor for you:

 

http://www.patriotresource.com/lotr/races/orcs.html

 

http://www.patriotresource.com/lotr/races/urukhai.html

[D.A.C.]

RE: MORE COCK!

 

>

>

>

My vote would be...looks like a urukhai, but is definitely an Orc.

[RockHard]

RE: A HUGE COCK!

 

Recently, some yap-happy MC member had the nerve to suggest that by posting an image of Benjamin Nicholas on the internet, wearing another man's cock, it might subject Ben to accusations of fraud (imagine that) and cock-size expectations he may not be able to fulfill in real life. SAY WHAAAAAAAAT? Is there another escort in the industry who has more 99%-naked images of himself on the internet? If a gay man can't tell the size of Benjamin's cock through the hundreds of underwear, swimming trunk and jock-strap shots currently on the web, then the gay man MUST need a seeing-eye dog or be a complete idiot.

 

Does anybody actually believe that porn DVD covers and porn magazine covers DON'T retouch (upsize) the cocks on their models? Does that mean if I purchase Matthew Rush and find his cock is smaller than his recent DVD box-cover, I may get the fuck for free? Is there someone I can sue? Is Matthew's reputation ruined? I don't think so.

 

I'll never forget the late 70's, when I was on my knees licking Al Parker's cock. Yes, I was quite young (he seemed to like that). Given my naivete at the time, between slurps and gulps, I looked up at his smile and said, "I expected it to be bigger." He laughed and said, "Everybody says that. That's the magic of film, lighting, camera angles and a cockring." I guess the 10 pounds the camera adds eventually found its way down to Parker's naked cock. I've owned a cockring ever since.

 

Photoshop in advertising is no secret and, the better the program gets, the happier porn producers are. Everybody in porn knows BIGGER COCKS SELL and no fool is comparing a photo to the real thing, especially in the presence of a well-known star. How can one actually measure a camera's ten pounds anyway? You can't.

 

Speaking of a ten pound cock, here are a "before" and "after" image of the infamous Kevin Slater. One could argue that Kevin certainly doesn't need any further enhancing but what if a size-queen porn producer has an insatiable appetite and wants to feed other size queens with his $28.95 fantasy. Hello Photoshop.

Reg. 2257, proof of age on file.

 

With just a few tweaks here and there, a XXX-large cock is suddenly THICKER and LONGER with BIGGER balls and no loss of detail or evidence of a cut-n-paste. And who among us is interested in filing a complaint? Keep in mind, these images are 72ppi compressed jpegs. Imagine what a pro can do with a 16-bit original RAW file, and I'm not talkin' bareback. I'll tell you what he can do: NO EVIDENCE OF RETOUCHING, and ka-ching at the cash register.)

 

Of course, in my fantasy of playing porn producer (one with taste, that is), I would go a few steps further and Botox the brow-furrow, which always makes a sweet face look stressed and aged. Get rid of the wart in the upper-corner of Kevin's right eyebrow. Soften the laugh lines so the facial skin doesn't look old and saggy. Get rid of that useless bump on the shoulder. And eliminate the wart on the side of the back. I could go further and fix the sagging ass cheek, and erase the piece of background that's posing as a puss-filled ingrown hair on the inner-leg. The left hand and forearm turning blue also needs attention but Kevin either ran out of money and should have hired a better photographer or he shouldn't have popped a Viagra.

 

Well, girls, this will end my Photoshop lesson and homage to the Launch of PS3. I hope I helped you get a twitch in your pants and to realize that many fantasies are indeed manufactured, or simply manipulated. If it's a visual fantasy that has a price tag, you can rest assured that it most likely found its way through Photoshop.

[FinFangFoom]

RE: A HUGE COCK!

 

>Keep in mind, these images are 72ppi compressed jpegs.

 

 

Ok Mr. Photoshop, would you like to share with the class what "ppi" stands for?

 

Forget that. Let's cut to the chase. There is no such thing as ppi - it's DPI. You will of course say that is was a typo and I might believe that if you didn't follow it with this ignorant statement.........

 

 

>Imagine what a pro can do with a 16-bit original RAW file

 

 

Memo to RockHard: RAW files aren't 16-bit - they are CONVERTED to 16-bit TIFFS.

 

Of course you're going to say: "how can they not be 16-bit if they are convertable to 16-bit?" That's not the point. No one who really knows anything about RAW files refers to them as 16-bit. RAW files are RAW files - period. But you're trying to appear smart so you throw around terminology that's you're not totally familiar with: 16-bit, RAW files, ppi.

 

Once again, you've shown that you're nothing more than a poseur.

 

Photographically yours,

 

FFF

[RockHard]

RE: Fin's HUGE DUMP!

 

Oh, Fin. Poor, poor Fin. You have no limit to your desire to make yourself look like a foolish, heartless, know-nothing. Can I recommend a course at The New School? I'm starting to feel sorry for you.

 

PPI stands for pixels-per-inch. Any CRT or LCD screen displays pixels-per-inch when working in Photoshop.

 

DPI stands for dots-per-inch and refers to an inkjet's ability to lay down "dots" of ink on photographic paper. PPI and DPI are not the same thing.

 

Since jpeg is the preferred format for photographic images on the web, what you are actually viewing on the screen are 72 pixels-per-inch. No typo, sweetie. Just a man who knows his shit.

 

My phrase, "Imagine what a pro can do with a 16-bit original RAW file" did not mean to suggest that the RAW file was actually 16 bit. A pro Photoshop user would know what I meant but I admit, an amateur might be confused.

 

From Adobe's Design Center Tutorial:

 

"We strongly recommend working with 16 Bits per Channel, as it provides the maximum amount of information in the final file. If you convert the RAW image to a 16-bit file, you will be able to maintain much smoother gradations of tone and color."

 

This was the point of my statement.

 

Converting to TIFF or PSD can be irrelevant because, with Adobe's Camera RAW feature and Adobe's new Lightroom, a lot of retouching can be done in RAW format before making any conversion decisions.

 

And the point of all this tech bullshit is to say, retouching is getting more and more sophisticated and less and less detectable (unless you're viewing Fin's attempt).

 

"Once again, you've shown that you're nothing more than a poseur."

 

Nice try you heartless blow-bag. But, really, ONCE AGAIN YOU'VE SHOWN WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE TO HAVE HOOF-IN-MOUTH DISEASE. Thanks for the chuckle, dear. You make this game too easy. :-)

[twinklover]

RE: Fin's HUGE DUMP!

 

I know, I know, some may say that RockHard is simply a pompous, pretentious, ostentatious, inflated, turgid, bombastic piece of shit. But that doesn't mean I shouldn't read his posts. And I do, even though many think of him as a dirty no-good asshole. Tonight's post about Kevin Slater was very illuminating. I have always believed that I can't trust pictures on the internet, and RockHard has reinforced that point very well. I may despise RockHard along with others here but his post concerning Kevin Slater was eye-opening to this old-fashioned trusting client. Watch out!

[RockHard]

RE: I'm Cryin'

 

"some may say that RockHard is simply a pompous, pretentious, ostentatious, inflated, turgid, bombastic piece of shit."

 

DAAAAAAMN, twinklover! I'm not the MC member with no heart. I can handle all the distinguishing characteristics but "piece of shit?" I felt that cold-hearted bitch-slap. Oh well, at least the piece is BOMBASTIC. And what's up with "some say?" Now you sound like Katie Couric interviewing the Edwardses. Who the fuck are some say?

 

"many think of him as a dirty no-good asshole"

 

OOOOOOUCH, twinklover! Two bitch-slaps in one paragraph. What's the matter, dear, absent 16-year-old ass got ya down? "Dirty no-good asshole" sounds like the title of a Chi Chi LaRue flick shot in Tex-ass. Again, how "many?" (I can't imagine anyone in real life calling me a "dirty no-good asshole." That's funny.)

 

"I may despise RockHard"

 

Oh, HONEY, let me hug you. :-) I may have meat on my bones but at least my heart and hug are warm. Nobody should be SO angry at someone they truly DO NOT KNOW. Not even my competitors in business "despise" me, and I give them plenty of reasons.

 

"But that doesn't mean I shouldn't read his posts."

 

And in spite of your slasher-vitriol that left me crying and bleeding in the streets of the MC, thank you for reading my posts.

[FinFangFoom]

RE: Fin's HUGE DUMP!

 

>Since jpeg is the preferred format for photographic images on

>the web, what you are actually viewing on the screen are 72

>pixels-per-inch. No typo, sweetie. Just a man who knows his

>shit.

 

 

And now you've proven my larger point for me - thank you very much.

 

OF COURSE a monitor is at 72 - it's impossible for it to be anything BUT 72. So what then, was the point of SPECIFYING that it was 72? It would be like mentioning the wet water or the cold snow or the hot flame.

 

Since it was obvious that you couldn't possibly be referring to a universal constant I logically assumed you were referring to dpi.

 

My mistake was that I didn't take into account that you're like the little girl at the party who feels no one is paying attention to her so she decides to start dancing and doing cartwheels so people will tell her how smart, talented and pretty she is.

 

When I posted the Photoshopped pictures of Little Benjie (let me once again stress this is not a veiled reference to the size of his penis) I did it purely as a joke and not to "show off". (My efforts were crude at best.)

 

You however, like the aforementioned little girl, decided you TOO could do Photoshop and started screaming "LOOK AT ME EVERYBODY! LOOK AT ME!" and proceeded to post something, whose only purpose, was to draw attention to your (meager) talent.

 

And to make the whole spectacle (and yourself) even more pathethic and sad, you then started throwing around jargon incorrectly and pointlessly just to make yourself appear smart, talented and pretty.

 

Good grief, I would hate to be living a life where I felt compelled to impressed strangers on a hooker message board just to feel smart, talented and pretty.

 

 

 

>My phrase, "Imagine what a pro can do with a 16-bit original

>RAW file" did not mean to suggest that the RAW file was

>actually 16 bit.

 

 

Then why did he say it that way class?

 

(see above)

 

 

 

>A pro Photoshop user would know what I meant

>but I admit, an amateur might be confused.

 

No, a Photoshop pro wouldn't be confused. Instead, they'd be embarrassed for the putz who would say it that way just so people would think he's smart, talented and pretty.

 

 

 

 

>From Adobe's Design Center Tutorial:

>

>"We strongly recommend working with 16 Bits

>per Channel, as it provides the maximum amount of information

>in the final file. If you convert the RAW image to a 16-bit

>file, you will be able to maintain much smoother gradations of

>tone and color."

>

>This was the point of my statement.

 

 

(see above)

 

 

 

>Converting to TIFF or PSD can be irrelevant because, with

>Adobe's Camera RAW feature and Adobe's new Lightroom, a lot of

>retouching can be done in RAW format before making any

>conversion decisions.

 

 

(What a dumb fuck) No, it can't be irrelevant because ultimately you MUST convert the RAW file to another format. Based upon your (idiotic) statement, you just do what you need to do in Lightroom, for instance, and that's that.

 

Oh really now? Can you import that RAW file into inDesign? No. Illustrator? No. Can you email that file to a friend who doesn't have the necessary software for RAW files and have them open it? No.

 

There there Rockhard. We all think you're smart, talented and pretty so you can now go sit down in the chair over by the coffee table.

 

 

 

>And the point of all this tech bullshit is to say, retouching

>is getting more and more sophisticated and less and less

>detectable (unless you're viewing Fin's attempt).

 

 

Only the two people on this board who know who I am (and one of them, I don't believe, is aware of something very important) can fully appreciate how assinine this whole Photoshop discussion is and why I'm tiring of it very quickly.

 

Poor RockHard. If we all tell you you're smart, talented and pretty will you promise to stop making a spectacle of yourself? At your age, it's not attractive.

 

 

Attractively yours,

 

FFF

[RockHard]

RE: Fin's HUGE DUMP!

 

My two favorite lines from FinFangFoom:

 

"Once again, you've shown that you're nothing more than a poseur."

 

"Good grief, I would hate to be living a life where I felt compelled to impressed strangers on a hooker message board just to feel smart, talented and pretty."

 

My goodness, you tried with sincere determination to pin the above tale on the donkey but all you did was succeed in showing yourself to be the donkey. Thank you for describing yourself better than I could.

 

When all you really needed to say from the get-go:

 

"When I posted the Photoshopped pictures (My efforts were crude at best.)" Even though you found it impossible to say it in one direct sentence.

 

Fin, I really don't enjoy beating a man when he's down. It's not my style. No wonder the dialogue has exhausted you, dear. You can stop all that back-peddling now.

 

Feel free to berate me as you see fit because my work here is done. There's nothing worse than conversing with someone who NEEDS to prove that he knows what he's talking about while he dances around in circles with foolishness in his mouth.

 

I never hesitated to compliment you on your talent in the past but that consideration will end now. I gave you a little rope and you decided to hang yourself with it. I now think you are ONE BIG FOOL.

 

I pity the fact that you said you have no heart and part of me didn't want to believe it. I'm now convinced it's true and any respect I had for you is gone. You're not nearly as fun or as original as I thought you might be. But, in spite of how common you truly are, you'll never hear me say, go away.

[RockHard]

RE: A HUGE COCK, now gone!

 

"Reg. 2257, proof of age on file."

 

Ooops, sorry Cooper and Daddy, et al. I forgot about that little nuisance. I figure with Gonzales half out the door, times are-a-changin' back. Wishful thinking on my part, I guess.

 

Best wishes,

 

Rock :-)

[MindThe Gap]

RE: A HUGE COCK, now gone!

 

>"Reg. 2257, proof of age on

>file."

 

> I forgot about that little nuisance.

 

No you didn't. You're treating it just like everything else that comes out of your mouth: Self-serving bullshit. You are nothing short of a two-faced, double-talking, patheticly lonely, in need of attention, lying and deceitful old washed-up, ass licking Queen. You're boring. Your pompous. You're desperate. You're simply the biggest fool and idiot this board has EVER witnessed. Can't you see that most EVERYONE is laughing AT you and not with you?

 

You are a freak show without limitation or boundary.

[FinFangFoom]

RE: A HUGE COCK, now gone!

 

>You are

>nothing short of a two-faced, double-talking, patheticly

>lonely, in need of attention, lying and deceitful old

>washed-up, ass licking Queen. You're boring. Your pompous.

>You're desperate. You're simply the biggest fool and idiot

>this board has EVER witnessed. Can't you see that most

>EVERYONE is laughing AT you and not with you?

>

>You are a freak show without limitation or boundary.

 

 

And he's......repeat after me..........smart, talented and pretty.

 

If we keep telling him that, he might stop putting on a show and go sit in the chair next to the coffee table.

 

Hopefully yours,

 

FFF

[RockHard]

RE: ERIC'S COCK!

 

Since hundreds of my fans couldn't see my work on Kevin Slater because I stupidly posted full-erection images, here's one final treat before I say goodnight. Eric is simply delicious as he is but what certified size-queen wouldn't enjoy just a tad more?

 

 

ps Beware of the trolls. Their breath is foul.

[RockHard]

RE: NO COCKS!

 

To fellow readers:

 

I did not ask Benjamin Nicholas for his permission to use him as my muse on this Photoshop-celebration-thread and he did not make any special requests of me once he discovered its existence. Even though Benjamin asked for no considerations, I told him that I planned to remove all the images by early this week. Contrary to troll-bullshit and that waste-of-time-and-money Tom Isern, I'm a man of my word and the time for image removal has arrived.

 

Thanks to everyone who wrote with fun and kind words. Even if only one person enjoys my contributions here that's all the satisfaction I need. It pleases me to know that I make more than one gay man smile (edit) and that Tom and Fin are among my #1 fans.

 

As always, the trolls and the you-know-whos can go fuck themselves.

 

Wishing all the MC readers fun times,

 

Rock :-)

 

ps Btw, if any IGNORANT COWARD ASSHOLE stupidly tries to suggest that anyone other than me is responsible for these images being removed, I refer you to the thread entitled, "THERE ARE TROLLS AMONG US."

 

Although I grant Daddy permission to share the TRUTH publicly, I doubt he will address a troll. And I don't blame him. Trolls be damned and I say, "Go fuck yourself!"

 

pps Thank you, Daddy. I sincerely appreciate the extra effort and leaving Lucky's tongues intact. :-)