First Time Reviewers, Part II

[Guest TNT Ted]

"As you've been told before; your Grand standing."

 

No, you didn't tell me before. Deej did. Unless you're one and the same. And I asked him in what way was I grandstanding. No answer. So I'll ask you the same thing. How am I grandstanding?

 

As to the reason you're not publishing my reviews, I'm not sure. I suspect your stated reason will be that you don't have my contact telephone number, the purpose of which is to verify the authenticity of the reviewer. In my case, I've been a posting member on this site for almost a year and you know very well that every review I've submitted is authentic.

 

No, I think the real reason you're not publishing my latest review is that it's not a glowing, rave review of one of your 'star' escorts. And IMO that's your problem with this site. You're doing a disservice to the guys that take the time to write, submit, and use the reviews. You're playing favorites, and you're leaving the impression that the reviews you do publish are less that authentic.

 

Don't worry, I won't clutter up your site with 'bogus' reviews. I've found and use MER with infinitely more satisfaction.

[+ deej]

>No, you didn't tell me before. Deej did.

 

He said "As you've been told before" which is accurate. My statement was accurate as well, and still is. You were and still are grandstanding.

 

>In my case, I've been a posting member on this site for almost a

>year and you know very well that every review I've submitted is authentic.

 

By that criteria, he should accept reviews unchallenged from all 20+ identities of a former member. Those were live identities for over a year. I wouldn't hold your breath for that to happen, either. Becoming a member of the MC does not involve verification and has no relation to processing reviews.

 

As has been explained to you before, Daddy does not discuss review processing in the message center. Write to [email protected]

[Guest alanm]

"As to the reason you're not publishing my reviews, I'm not sure. I suspect your stated reason will be that you don't have my contact telephone number, the purpose of which is to verify the authenticity of the reviewer. In my case, I've been a posting member on this site for almost a year and you know very well that every review I've submitted is authentic."

 

You are making a serious charge which undermines the credibility of

all the reviews on this site. Yet you do not explain why Daddy does not have your contact telephone number.

[RockHard]

"How am I grandstanding?"

"I've found and use MER with infinitely more satisfaction."

 

Oh, Ted, if you get any more blatant or showy, I may have to offer you Tom Isern's url. (Please don't make me go there.)

 

You're credibility on this issue has seriously waned. Maybe you should consider a new username to save future face. ANY rec of MER on this board HAS TO BE VIEWED WITH extreme SUSPICION. (Talk about a valueless endorsement.)

 

ALL negative reviews, especially of well-known escorts, MUST be scrutinized with care and caution. The temptation to "destroy" a reputation here is simply too prevalent. And bating Daddy will get you the slap you were looking for. If I were Daddy, I would ban such obstinance.